blob: 50f2a141d42a8a4259e0dd5312a259fbf4668d80 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
|
Return-Path: <thomas@thomaszander.se>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E7F34A0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 29 Jul 2015 11:19:03 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from pmx.vmail.no (pmx.vmail.no [193.75.16.11])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFAB1EA
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 29 Jul 2015 11:19:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pmx.vmail.no (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by localhost (pmx.isp.as2116.net) with SMTP id 0B88761F56
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:19:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp.bluecom.no (smtp.bluecom.no [193.75.75.28])
by pmx.vmail.no (pmx.isp.as2116.net) with ESMTP id D09836137C
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:19:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from coldstorage.localnet (unknown [81.191.185.32])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by smtp.bluecom.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C521F1F550
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:19:00 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Zander <thomas@thomaszander.se>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:18:59 +0200
Message-ID: <3320169.dB2Z2CsUel@coldstorage>
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.1 (Linux/3.16.0-4-amd64; KDE/4.14.2; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <4F7FB1A0-E201-40F2-80BA-4C8D6ECC4DC4@gmail.com>
References: <1B7F00D3-41AE-44BF-818D-EC4EF279DC11@gmail.com>
<35B780B8-7282-4C98-9A0D-C7774028E277@gmail.com>
<4F7FB1A0-E201-40F2-80BA-4C8D6ECC4DC4@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Why Satoshi's temporary anti-spam measure isn't
temporary
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 11:19:03 -0000
On Tuesday 28. July 2015 19.40.21 Eric Lombrozo via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> 1) A fee market never really got created, we don=E2=80=99t really kno=
w how
> transaction fees would work in practice.
>=20
> The only way to see how fees would work in practice is to have scarci=
ty.
This skips over the question why you need a fees market. There really i=
s no=20
reason that for the next 10 to 20 years there is a need for a fees mark=
et to=20
incentive miners to mine. Planning that far ahead is doomed to failure=
.
--=20
Thomas Zander
|
