1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
|
Return-Path: <voisine@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9323C78D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 18 Jun 2016 06:07:52 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-lf0-f45.google.com (mail-lf0-f45.google.com
[209.85.215.45])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 724B9A1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 18 Jun 2016 06:07:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-lf0-f45.google.com with SMTP id q132so9827188lfe.3
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 17 Jun 2016 23:07:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=mujtsPoWlbQeQ6Hhqyu8fTcBoHFxdi+qDgtILUVcI38=;
b=QLAG5o/xOP4TYsgX4iIJ/XeH+Gl8E1RmcG++ZDcRitW7aelLR0Ux4uPcdxcioj5qWe
ThJo/8wwJmXO7Ck/EfDEUlYlr3mtZlZtaLd+vYHEVQFdRFg0b/9WQqnGCK+j+vxGeFXE
zWjXQ9Cy9AVjv7DA35+qH012GfsBbPKuiJwbL590o5t0f0izDs0M0pA+l9hc8/k5z1Fx
dooOXVN4dcH1aODUo2rZ0c6wAbZU1xSubblSpajftetLiTxARLE5Tv+wXiZgFnB/DHHw
mVK0lfzHeKDTerGRLQkVKT5I+Fdx0RfVk6sqLAvlpLFcr4l9Kh+rLZ4byrByPthDu8eI
0Arg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to;
bh=mujtsPoWlbQeQ6Hhqyu8fTcBoHFxdi+qDgtILUVcI38=;
b=c+/oWYbO7ASE3i0yxqoQ/1eCsPUCpTe/17f06GZFTa/U0S1iTyh6CZ8Ep1sVHsEZbW
DI1+2vagpvpqapeoVvb6d5aA9HOwyneMi67+Ari1tOBzPq0pCx2xZzMZL3FK/zh2Gnwe
0Id5NRwdBD5AK1i/Yny8GnZWKqKqCGzrZzZ0G8hqCA3sKuKajJRgN7z8ktnnIGhbCozu
Zkg7Zi5TZuCJeupCOVhP1TA7lFEu5rIuT34LSf85QSlaysLMuf4iNAuxnDDjHyAHNsqI
tR3urUurKwW+MI4CokiSGi0LkJ6n4GvphP30MBrNlPFgRzolznllCSLZy+G0M8ThNQaG
9Olw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tL73QJloH67TCybkxWl8/ZO95ARwB1N9n0aRxx6RXgOtSiUbQqxvwOiAx6HsRqDoMVUpmsyE+ND2yK2DA==
X-Received: by 10.25.83.15 with SMTP id h15mr1324099lfb.81.1466230069507; Fri,
17 Jun 2016 23:07:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.114.26.72 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 23:07:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5760259B.7040409@mycelium.com>
References: <5760259B.7040409@mycelium.com>
From: Aaron Voisine <voisine@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 23:07:48 -0700
Message-ID: <CACq0ZD4EWNxmsbz4pUv30ZPS9O+paMNzqvaHpL6uZ5tF-up4iQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Daniel Weigl <Daniel.Weigl@mycelium.com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1140683e73bd4b0535874afc
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] RFC for BIP: Derivation scheme for
P2WPKH-nested-in-P2SH based accounts
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 06:07:52 -0000
--001a1140683e73bd4b0535874afc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
This works for segwit version 1 with the addition of also using a different
chain id.
I presume that segwit version 2 will be implementing schnorr signatures.
What do we know about the likely implementation details? Is there any way
to avoid using a third derivation path to support it?
Aaron Voisine
co-founder and CEO
breadwallet <http://breadwallet.com>
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Daniel Weigl via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> Following up to the discussion last month (
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2016-May/012695.html
> ), ive prepared a proposal for a BIP here:
>
>
> https://github.com/DanielWeigl/bips/blob/master/bip-p2sh-accounts.mediawiki
>
>
> Any comments on it? Does anyone working on a BIP44 compliant wallet
> implement something different?
> If there are no objection, id also like to request a number for it.
>
> Thx,
> Daniel
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
--001a1140683e73bd4b0535874afc
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">This works for segwit version 1 with the addition of also =
using a different chain id.=C2=A0<div><br></div><div>I presume that segwit =
version 2 will be implementing schnorr signatures. What do we know about th=
e likely implementation details? Is there any way to avoid using a third de=
rivation path to support it?</div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br clea=
r=3D"all"><div><div class=3D"gmail_signature" data-smartmail=3D"gmail_signa=
ture"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div dir=3D"ltr"><div><br=
>Aaron Voisine</div><div>co-founder and CEO<br><a href=3D"http://breadwalle=
t.com" target=3D"_blank">breadwallet</a></div></div></div></div></div></div=
></div></div>
<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Daniel Weig=
l via bitcoin-dev <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists=
.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.o=
rg</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"marg=
in:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi List,<br>
<br>
Following up to the discussion last month ( <a href=3D"https://lists.linuxf=
oundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2016-May/012695.html" rel=3D"noreferrer=
" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev=
/2016-May/012695.html</a> ), ive prepared a proposal for a BIP here:<br>
<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 <a href=3D"https://github.com/DanielWeigl/bips/=
blob/master/bip-p2sh-accounts.mediawiki" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blan=
k">https://github.com/DanielWeigl/bips/blob/master/bip-p2sh-accounts.mediaw=
iki</a><br>
<br>
<br>
Any comments on it? Does anyone working on a BIP44 compliant wallet impleme=
nt something different?<br>
If there are no objection, id also like to request a number for it.<br>
<br>
Thx,<br>
Daniel<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.=
linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail=
man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>
--001a1140683e73bd4b0535874afc--
|
