1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
|
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <slashdevnull@hotmail.com>) id 1WOGtJ-0002hl-NE
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Fri, 14 Mar 2014 01:26:29 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of hotmail.com
designates 65.55.111.172 as permitted sender)
client-ip=65.55.111.172; envelope-from=slashdevnull@hotmail.com;
helo=blu0-omc4-s33.blu0.hotmail.com;
Received: from blu0-omc4-s33.blu0.hotmail.com ([65.55.111.172])
by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
id 1WOGtI-0001lJ-Lt for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Fri, 14 Mar 2014 01:26:29 +0000
Received: from BLU402-EAS323 ([65.55.111.137]) by
blu0-omc4-s33.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft
SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 13 Mar 2014 18:26:23 -0700
X-TMN: [IzSXt7HS+7dbSkxBqk0Wd42A6XIoFa1I]
X-Originating-Email: [slashdevnull@hotmail.com]
Message-ID: <BLU402-EAS32370CF56D38C1F37520D4CC6700@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Un Ix <slashdevnull@hotmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 09:26:19 +0800
References: <CAKaEYhK4oXH3hB7uS3=AEkA6r0VB5OYyTua+LOP18rq+rYajHg@mail.gmail.com>
<52852C2D.9020103@gmail.com> <52853D8A.6010501@monetize.io>
<CAJHLa0M6CkoDbD6FFixf9-mmhug7DvehSWCJ+EHWVxUDuwNiBg@mail.gmail.com>
<EE02A310-8604-4811-B2D0-FC32C72C20F3@grabhive.com>
<CAJHLa0OMcTCgGESi-F4jT2NA3FyCeMYbD_52j47t3keEYBfK8g@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+s+GJBSGPBQWWYR1NYSc2E4Y1BWAn8zf7xsu4wQ1O8cA8OWbw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAJHLa0NEEppHg_Lmi_Oxnz_gPSHZPfQpeg+-8MrvFYDmdM83-g@mail.gmail.com>
<20140313160850.GW3180@nl.grid.coop>
To: Troy Benjegerdes <hozer@hozed.org>
In-Reply-To: <20140313160850.GW3180@nl.grid.coop>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Mar 2014 01:26:23.0261 (UTC)
FILETIME=[69279CD0:01CF3F24]
X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(slashdevnull[at]hotmail.com)
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust [65.55.111.172 listed in list.dnswl.org]
-0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
domain
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
X-Headers-End: 1WOGtI-0001lJ-Lt
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Wendell <w@grabhive.com>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] moving the default display to mbtc
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 01:26:29 -0000
Second this comment.
A change like this so soon after mt gox debacle would be one more sign of bi=
tcoins 'instability' for skeptics and average folk who read only headlines.
In general, it seems some people are looking to try and change the publics m=
ental price of BTC which is more of a non-technical challenge.=20
Gavin
> On 14/03/2014, at 12:21 am, "Troy Benjegerdes" <hozer@hozed.org> wrote:
>=20
> <cynic hat: on>
>=20
> Every volatility bump messes up expectations of what a bitcoin is worth,
> so why are we bikeshedding uBTC vs mBTC? Just be done with it and do mBTC
> now, and plan uBTC for just after the next price spike to $10KUSD or whate=
ver,=20
> and then plan on rolling back to mBTC when the price crashes from altcoin
> money supply inflation competition.
>=20
>=20
>> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 09:45:54AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> <vendor hat: on>
>>=20
>> Based on this seeming consensus, BitPay was headed towards uBTC
>> internally, and hoped to coordinate messaging and rollout with others
>> in the community. Ah well, proceed apace, and Bitcoin Wallet will
>> catch up, I suppose.
>>=20
>> Multiple unit changes negatively impact users, but we are already there :=
/
>>=20
>>=20
>>> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Wladimir <laanwj@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>=20
>>>> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@bitpay.com> wrote=
:
>>>>=20
>>>> Resurrecting this topic. Bitcoin Wallet moved to mBTC several weeks
>>>> ago, which was disappointing -- it sounded like the consensus was
>>>> uBTC, and moving to uBTC later --which will happen-- may result in
>>>> additional user confusion, thanks to yet another decimal place
>>>> transition.
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> I've kind of given up getting any consensus about this, or even getting
>>> people to care.
>>>=20
>>> Everyone agrees that a decimal shift would be good, but it's the same bo=
ring
>>> shed painting discussion every time on how many decimals. In the end not=
hing
>>> happens.
>>>=20
>>> I can't really blame Andreas for finally taking action and making the ch=
ange
>>> to mBTC. People in the community are familiar with mBTC because some
>>> exchanges and price sites used mBTC (at least for a while when >$1000), a=
lso
>>> mBTC seems to be catching on on reddit etc.
>>>=20
>>> Moving to muBTC (which in itself would be better because it is the final=
>>> unit change ever needed without hardfork) would require more coordinated=
>>> education effort.
>>>=20
>>> Wladimir
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>> --=20
>> Jeff Garzik
>> Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist
>> BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/
>>=20
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----
>> Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
>> "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and thei=
r
>> applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field,
>> this first edition is now available. Download your free book today!
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bitcoin-development mailing list
>> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>=20
> --=20
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------=
--
> Troy Benjegerdes 'da hozer' hozer@hozed.o=
rg
> 7 elements earth::water::air::fire::mind::spirit::soul grid.co=
op
>=20
> Never pick a fight with someone who buys ink by the barrel,
> nor try buy a hacker who makes money by the megahash
>=20
>=20
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------=
----
> Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
> "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their=
> applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field,
> this first edition is now available. Download your free book today!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
|
