summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/40/c78f81ad8c209b66deee7af7937ee0c728b617
blob: 55cc7949cce60974aaf03f58ad0ae9341a396d22 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
Return-Path: <daniele.pinna@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6259E94B
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 29 Sep 2017 10:43:24 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pf0-f181.google.com (mail-pf0-f181.google.com
	[209.85.192.181])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 295D2AA
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 29 Sep 2017 10:43:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pf0-f181.google.com with SMTP id g65so545883pfe.13
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 29 Sep 2017 03:43:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; 
	bh=SBiyR/wTgIDFilnL4Sb1aHdnVqzdSIhlIpdTS9PppAA=;
	b=TmXPei3MOuUvbifH3kgrq62JX5U5B/teWsL45a4MnmYwdH+vAWqTDQR07LXsiedVEP
	uCidgRLkiZ+rUo0bDHuNDpGIogflddHp+NBiHOMPbVdO6fGpdkbK5z2sE2wTQ6IS3moa
	Vkp7XD9SRInYR2W37d6BxyZOYHOAnTp1+mRmZnfkpivH+d5Ob6Om1/ujBqMx7yzauUxR
	qmyEChME5q65fso7MUP7iECoc/r22NWSpwH0KvTpJSxH/rDrs5WEouvp0RaJyk4UYYC/
	7XzeGQNW6sjx785DtP1+onIiuGU8u0Mh8UHgEl5/O0ah3C8FlpWghm9tdgJscA/8zVaw
	frOg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to;
	bh=SBiyR/wTgIDFilnL4Sb1aHdnVqzdSIhlIpdTS9PppAA=;
	b=DEcZhTu8fqwnJpoWHlt9oJtQ7SS+LTalo0ij6Cawjo9pglVygqiAUDhJ3czIMy5fil
	bPTinshJrQOWL7gaaiVodnzAzrQmHcLn0y1EEHhjLCNgWGPxqMTjcna/G3+FBzFgMvNq
	zkZX3TuWuf1RX0D8NVOn4lpP8IM+7b2wu2zFJt2395cRj61/N8hbrw5+9xuAWPiwmcGT
	XU3twPm3JgvvYeSQJydJSXzmXUIjH4rNkFnJMg/hbtU6VxSLDH478efsf7bPtqyFyHts
	uLUyVDGY89jXDFBVIp1e4E38hbGG5Mha6MQbOWSHP1yHstVfUfiUmhuqVyb4A8J015bl
	om8Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUhyVtVd7yHooWjeBHAeEcwjNHAiCwTqHcI+xrsyYB+vhy2R60tB
	k6bITy8y+o5sGfTaMJTv9rtKNZZkxa8Fkv1o4uc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QA+oUHwBHJwLGhOuN+Ju/GOdEnf+x0XJl2A1pyBSyNG5VtKsAxIoNhHIW5JD4zEwUwMqPwnvsyPleer55EDCnk=
X-Received: by 10.159.198.10 with SMTP id f10mr6655628plo.14.1506681803562;
	Fri, 29 Sep 2017 03:43:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.155.44 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 03:43:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.100.155.44 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 03:43:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAEgR2PEyWFO1RFohVEpcb-M7aM-8xjCFvDPeJPD4zF4yTCyZ0A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAEgR2PGCZ=F85yjAbZgC6NtzhpdgBL3n4M2jowN12wJ7x-Ai1A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEgR2PGrxDQE0k8WX4XXz9GN-RAL6JB51ST9Hdz=ba36gRCa6A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEgR2PFjt=ihzRBhNXbHTAJz1R+3vz8o-zRZkDA3iBo39x9cTQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEgR2PFfSjJjkTYq+DAmTzmkHPxqhn6fUDoXTzrRebz+OoUgqw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEgR2PG5ZueHKDXbsPDEjQG7xAYBa_JAtPZo9n1V2=STC1srpA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEgR2PGPQ1e9SmoWOS3V+N9v+OWiM4g3nPN3d9urc+DfkWEJ7A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEgR2PEKkHH6+Sh8cQGF83-s1tpwQZgd0fiuNz_xyWu0mUPfCA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEgR2PEyWFO1RFohVEpcb-M7aM-8xjCFvDPeJPD4zF4yTCyZ0A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Daniele Pinna <daniele.pinna@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 12:43:22 +0200
Message-ID: <CAEgR2PGrf+4pQRyNC_xKVEKXimKTWveGK9q6YJeZkG0_r=8tkg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark@friedenbach.org, Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0825a870b0e69e055a51b14e"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
	DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
	autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 11:55:33 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Rebatable fees & incentive-safe fee markets
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 10:43:24 -0000

--089e0825a870b0e69e055a51b14e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Maybe I'm getting this wrong but wouldn't this scheme imply that a miner is
incentivized to limit the amount of transactions in a block to capture the
maximum fee of the ones included?

As an example, mined blocks currently carry ~0.8 btc in fees right now. If
I were to submit a transaction paying 1 btc in maximal money fees, then the
miner would be incentivized to include my transaction alone to avoid that
lower fee paying transactions reduce the amount of fees he can earn from my
transaction alone. This would mean that I could literally clog the network
by paying 1btc every ten minutes.

Am I missing something?

Daniele

--089e0825a870b0e69e055a51b14e
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"auto">Maybe I&#39;m getting this wrong but wouldn&#39;t this sc=
heme imply that a miner is incentivized to limit the amount of transactions=
 in a block to capture the maximum fee of the ones included?<div dir=3D"aut=
o"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">As an example, mined blocks currently carry =
~0.8 btc in fees right now. If I were to submit a transaction paying 1 btc =
in maximal money fees, then the miner would be incentivized to include my t=
ransaction alone to avoid that lower fee paying transactions reduce the amo=
unt of fees he can earn from my transaction alone. This would mean that I c=
ould literally clog the network by paying 1btc every ten minutes.</div><div=
 dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Am I missing something?</div><div=
 dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Daniele=C2=A0</div></div>

--089e0825a870b0e69e055a51b14e--