1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
|
Return-Path: <tomh@thinlink.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB13B1C12
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 1 Oct 2015 14:23:40 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pa0-f45.google.com (mail-pa0-f45.google.com
[209.85.220.45])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C51779
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 1 Oct 2015 14:23:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pablk4 with SMTP id lk4so75596763pab.3
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 01 Oct 2015 07:23:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=VaWa4G72UWiePYSqS9WkJN7X4Nky/4xwvKieAxuzFjg=;
b=gMizhYZDyrtgUJ4LajfEANs/R5uuiGH4WyCyOzuJAGqr6qevzMhlOngUaPs1s7f4yd
JpDqvDbE/+4MThuijrKOH2pC1/4kh+wX6zKjaAmrtCjVW53tDluI5fJo8YjYqnmKGujk
CgtGZEIVyc3vIusTVgOGD1ARyPULAlK+Q6xIbYTsJg+OaAfmzWRAgqfbi0ZYCBb4R+pT
PlrqJLAYz4j/x2417s8VOhu6nHzt9qb0EBwy4UkWo4RWzQzTPbsx6YiR+XUEnabLURUQ
W4m5GlDoJ24Hs4fM8UPlE4MckICtOjKZ5q4rSSCTJw06VF++i9JjHYn3d8qAiXNPZhVk
c3OA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmsCX4J1oUeN3+UhUwO4AcnEVhVRFzlhImkuM4wobiBjE6s9m9ISvtwXSHFFUwjoOLMqOYU
X-Received: by 10.66.147.38 with SMTP id th6mr12543706pab.94.1443709419968;
Thu, 01 Oct 2015 07:23:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.89] (99-8-65-117.lightspeed.davlca.sbcglobal.net.
[99.8.65.117]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id
xm9sm7055344pbc.32.2015.10.01.07.23.38
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Thu, 01 Oct 2015 07:23:39 -0700 (PDT)
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
References: <20150927185031.GA20599@savin.petertodd.org>
<CA+w+GKRCVr-9TVk66utp7xLRgTxNpxYoj3XQE-6y_N8JS6eO6Q@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAS2fgSEDGBd67m7i8zCgNRqtmQrZyZMj7a5TsYo41Dh=tdhHQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+w+GKRKGS=KZrLtiW8Zbn4EQH_TELfQR+TfrADCMXLR22Q+tw@mail.gmail.com>
<CABm2gDrkv3T66=BCBiHYb9h8PY41TFCwpzVR_E7UM0c+QcK-Eg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tom Harding <tomh@thinlink.com>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Message-ID: <560D41EB.7040902@thinlink.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 07:23:39 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CABm2gDrkv3T66=BCBiHYb9h8PY41TFCwpzVR_E7UM0c+QcK-Eg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Let's deploy BIP65 CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY!
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 14:23:40 -0000
On 9/30/2015 10:58 AM, Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> I don't think we need to wait for you to understand the advantages of
> softforks to move forward with BIP65, just like we didn't need to wait
> for every developer and user to understand BIP66 to deploy it.
What a bad example. BIP66 deployment failed, and was rescued by
centralized intervention.
|
