1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
|
Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 131F6486
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 21 Jun 2016 22:19:50 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from outmail148099.authsmtp.net (outmail148099.authsmtp.net
[62.13.148.99])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 791B913A
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 21 Jun 2016 22:19:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-c247.authsmtp.com (mail-c247.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.247])
by punt22.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id u5LMJjCk015582;
Tue, 21 Jun 2016 23:19:45 +0100 (BST)
Received: from petertodd.org (ec2-52-5-185-120.compute-1.amazonaws.com
[52.5.185.120]) (authenticated bits=0)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id u5LMJfm2071709
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Tue, 21 Jun 2016 23:19:42 +0100 (BST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by petertodd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 044434010B;
Tue, 21 Jun 2016 22:17:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 628E920217; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 18:19:40 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 18:19:40 -0400
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Message-ID: <20160621221940.GA10368@fedora-21-dvm>
References: <CAJowKg+zYtUnHv+ea--srehVa5K46sjpWbHVcVGRY5x0w5XRTQ@mail.gmail.com>
<201606212044.38931.luke@dashjr.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <201606212044.38931.luke@dashjr.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-Server-Quench: 40bdcf74-37fe-11e6-bcde-0015176ca198
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
aQdMdAMUEkAaAgsB AmAbWVdeUVR7XWE7 bghPaBtcak9QXgdq
T0pMXVMcUQAUfGZX WxweVRh1dwwIfnZw ZAhmXiIPDxJ9cVt+
RRgBCGwHMGF9OjNL BV1YdwJRcQRMLU5E Y1gxNiYHcQ5VPz4z
GA41ejw8IwAXBTpY REkIKkgfCV4RGSY7 XB0OVR8OJQUIVzk+
KQcnLVgHVFoWem8T CRN5AQ1AWwA8
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1038:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 52.5.185.120/25
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Even more proposed BIP extensions to BIP 0070
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 22:19:50 -0000
--vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 08:44:37PM +0000, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> X509 is entrenched, so it should remain supported. PGP might make sense f=
or=20
> people already using it (it provides no real security for un-WoT-networke=
d=20
> users), but unforunately, few people use it. Correct me if I'm wrong, but=
IIRC=20
> Keybase uses blockchain spam, so definitely not something to be encourage=
d if=20
How else would you have keybase accomplish what they're accomplishing, with=
the
same security model?
--=20
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
--vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXab15AAoJEGOZARBE6K+yZpcH+gM60WaYMHWIK8HuBHZbWtdq
siZ86L5ZU5ElVjhL8zouiSFs9J2bvfg4sz6E+cisOA/qP388wp8cFvD25DtWKEuv
bprYxjaOQXxbxqvzjtC9RvWCAD5DTHwekM547lZRL9YIT3atjKj6sT0qveupUuC4
tkH5O6RPUF8Im9jqAWVGMBlHU45Xjsx8pGVrI+U/7hWGActzVibJGedcIZTNtYVv
ljD6X+2i0bDEDwAUZSXckMAg4zeus7UIRwbdob/XD7pE38hUoQ/4i/twEEsi2DZ0
h1xUWKHy2/dodfIzUu12AI3fbQoPA67fRvm5cHc+ysi+3q6bpNyg8Zioj9mq5jU=
=wlBC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL--
|
