1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>) id 1VeRMq-00061i-Up
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 07 Nov 2013 15:19:32 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.223.174 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.223.174; envelope-from=pieter.wuille@gmail.com;
helo=mail-ie0-f174.google.com;
Received: from mail-ie0-f174.google.com ([209.85.223.174])
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1VeRMn-0001cU-OU
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 07 Nov 2013 15:19:32 +0000
Received: by mail-ie0-f174.google.com with SMTP id qd12so1023031ieb.33
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Thu, 07 Nov 2013 07:19:24 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.42.189.132 with SMTP id de4mr5537969icb.35.1383837564170;
Thu, 07 Nov 2013 07:19:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.50.141.136 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 07:19:24 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAPg+sBimHp-dSPLvyq_P0aspu_Mr3wFTox0-yKWs+USRwV3Wnw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <527B9F9B.4060808@ceptacle.com>
<CAPg+sBimHp-dSPLvyq_P0aspu_Mr3wFTox0-yKWs+USRwV3Wnw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 16:19:24 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPg+sBhJqavKYW5TkW4N49FDiR-iRFrTaAEeeXL8rRtAOKjupQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
To: Michael Gronager <gronager@ceptacle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(pieter.wuille[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1VeRMn-0001cU-OU
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] On the optimal block size and why
transaction fees are 8 times too low (or transactions 8 times too big)
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 15:19:33 -0000
Correcting myself:
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com> wrote:
> I believe that C. Decker's paper used measurements for propagation
> delays for blocks 180000-190000, which happened between may and juli
> 2012. The latest bitcoind/bitcoin-qt release at the time was 0.6.3.
They did use data from blocks 20000-210000, september-november 2012.
That was still before the 0.8 release, however.
--
Pieter
|
