1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
|
Return-Path: <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADB0FB4C
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 11 Apr 2017 21:25:47 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ua0-f171.google.com (mail-ua0-f171.google.com
[209.85.217.171])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1290D179
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 11 Apr 2017 21:25:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ua0-f171.google.com with SMTP id 49so6059816uau.2
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 11 Apr 2017 14:25:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=jtimon-cc.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=BDlgrcNfx3axqpnhVxmPOYjmcfCq3a/0stYGVabEs4o=;
b=O6jjgYmLYQNEsdTnnVruy6hVTo94Aq2bj8Sy+iD2ntQZTZDthfDrPFge2dCp490vhG
8fFoSH0dOL58eAanKmjAlFTqkoTQz51DYiMc0/tiPT74is8aQJmI7hYM0bxbJtEukA5A
urBBM+Vt9OxPspTyDvYEf0Z2SyBfgk86xDNY6nXhcrixF4d5KpjLZNk+vJlajSo4mEth
a2P2b7WmnvwikilQIqrbIMX/TA8Ef2ouLEr/T4oodPpCBP6RSiuxvqZyayzeglNSNfn7
RpSPmAweeIGLAlUFAovoyyU2+nvTHiGxYQ9+tfbvgt6GsSWHUdX2vb2u6oGDR3jeZp9W
em2Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=BDlgrcNfx3axqpnhVxmPOYjmcfCq3a/0stYGVabEs4o=;
b=c4FqbDQDUvFHbn7rXHBRoCkgO0YNNxmcFKPHDyo9OlwvZUOp9RB0cDDASXzrudsmmO
rArv7zJWq+Afr4vvRMB7DMHw759Oxce4j3Xinj4opA1Bb6IGjZmdA5fS/LlMMTTrwYyZ
wmvb5FUM5TMOzHvoBzRsr/NTqKJHynpl+7gkhTfa7DXzWUA9r3ql4cpz+SOPM7TltLpN
54S1+owRZDw54FQ9tU83uqaGvnZ7hc0E/ib/DdvDLpoLK4vmW4x9UTJwitpEjh6CMDyd
XBcV/8uVILguFEfV+s+VHQWunG8md9aoCIH5VKQhyegINYLD4MIxHnwTtO9z7IdrYtJw
95lg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/6LvKDl5oXKwvrRVvFxqz7pUd+jCngnGjcJWYP3LdzdgBJzlovOcK+9+QQKjUcxsLJhR0jV5Vk9wEte9Q==
X-Received: by 10.176.85.92 with SMTP id u28mr5290857uaa.55.1491945946145;
Tue, 11 Apr 2017 14:25:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.151.136 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 14:25:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAJR7vkruAKxyB4GpU7=Tb7U8+zHzrb4PbL5zssC70BEtFVY=WA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJR7vkpRhNsQsem-nFkeubX04xx1y7aHwCENfg0d1266oOsXMw@mail.gmail.com>
<2151650.Y6dYBXdtR5@strawberry>
<04bbsNGwBdLiye5VgB_cNxkCNiOSNJBWFpI2QbN_o_ZQWRLEU7FjgkfOi5DZXrrBeQIuacMn_JHGzzX4dCmoyjmpT6PI9GZDu3JDgpgT4Pw=@protonmail.com>
<CAJR7vkruAKxyB4GpU7=Tb7U8+zHzrb4PbL5zssC70BEtFVY=WA@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 23:25:45 +0200
Message-ID: <CABm2gDrXTVpJ9_HAkQh87qeBOu6FhfxeM7S-qy0APYrLwWWKnA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jimmy Song <jaejoon@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: "bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org"
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] A Small Modification to Segwit
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 21:25:47 -0000
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Jimmy Song via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> I've changed the proposal so only 8 bits are given to grinding so something
> like 20 bits are available for signaling.
>
> I have to say I'm at a loss here as to what's next? Should I make a new BIP
> or try to convince the authors of BIP141 to modify their BIP? Could someone
> inform me on the next part of the process?
See bip2, specifically
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0002.mediawiki#bip-workflow
"Following a discussion, the proposal should be submitted to the BIPs
git repository as a pull request. This draft must be written in BIP
style as described below, and named with an alias such as
"bip-johndoe-infinitebitcoins" until the editor has assigned it a BIP
number (authors MUST NOT self-assign BIP numbers)."
But I think it's kind of late to modify bip141, given that there's
code out there with the current specification.
I guess you can propose extensions or alternatives to replace it. I'm
really not sure what's the next step, but I don't think you have
provided enough motivation as to why we would want to maintain
asicboost. You said it makes the network more secure, but that's not
the case, as explained, not even if all honest miners use it.
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Sancho Panza via bitcoin-dev
> <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> Tom Zander wrote:
>>
>> > The version field is still needed to actually allow future block version
>> > upgrades. We would cut off our road forward if that were to be blocked.
>>
>> I tend to agree, if all 32 bits were given up to grinding.
>>
>> But it's worth pointing out that BIP9 is purely informational, and the top
>> 3 bits are still reserved for other purposes. One of them could perhaps be
>> used to signal for an extended version field somewhere else, leaving the
>> bottom 29 as entropy?
>>
>> Not a direction I prefer, but just a technical possibility perhaps.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
|
