1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <pete@petertodd.org>) id 1Yr9WP-0008OA-5L
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sat, 09 May 2015 18:30:45 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of petertodd.org
designates 62.13.148.109 as permitted sender)
client-ip=62.13.148.109; envelope-from=pete@petertodd.org;
helo=outmail148109.authsmtp.co.uk;
Received: from outmail148109.authsmtp.co.uk ([62.13.148.109])
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
id 1Yr9WN-0006b3-02 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sat, 09 May 2015 18:30:45 +0000
Received: from mail-c237.authsmtp.com (mail-c237.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.237])
by punt18.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t49IUZu3052917;
Sat, 9 May 2015 19:30:35 +0100 (BST)
Received: from muck ([209.141.138.18]) (authenticated bits=128)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t49IUVpR012412
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
Sat, 9 May 2015 19:30:34 +0100 (BST)
Date: Sat, 9 May 2015 14:30:31 -0400
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Joel Joonatan Kaartinen <joel.kaartinen@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20150509183031.GG4948@muck>
References: <16096345.A1MpJQQkRW@crushinator>
<CAP63atbdFSw0rDeuwgtjsDYsXnKSHNN9=zedzip2MsZ0hSY59w@mail.gmail.com>
<CAGKSKfW7fJB6n3B-OoyXOep7hAQqWGGDTiZCkpJ7vXxWRFgveA@mail.gmail.com>
<20150508165144.GC27417@savin.petertodd.org>
<CAGKSKfVf6h6icETjfg1joWneiTYob0CTxLDQK-7Pob3+dh_nKQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6BvahUXLYAruDZOj"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAGKSKfVf6h6icETjfg1joWneiTYob0CTxLDQK-7Pob3+dh_nKQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Server-Quench: 7b4a7db4-f679-11e4-9f74-002590a135d3
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
aAdMdgsUFVQNAgsB AmMbWl1eU117Wmc7 aQpYcwRZY1RPXA10
UUBWR1pVCwQmRRgI f3t4EntydgdCeXw+ bEBiWD5cDkArchIv
RlMCE2oPeGZhPWQC WRZfcx5UcAFPdx8U a1N6AHBDAzANdhES
HhM4ODE3eDlSNilR RRkIIFQOdA4zBDkk QAsPEX0mGVEIXSM6
Mx04J0VUAEFZLkU/ eQF5fHhQKAMfEm8W EVxLCzNYIF9p
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1024:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 209.141.138.18/587
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
X-Headers-End: 1Yr9WN-0006b3-02
Cc: Bitcoin Development <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed alternatives to the 20MB step
function
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 May 2015 18:30:45 -0000
--6BvahUXLYAruDZOj
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 01:36:56AM +0300, Joel Joonatan Kaartinen wrote:
> such a contract is a possibility, but why would big owners give an
> exclusive right to such pools? It seems to me it'd make sense to offer
> those for any miner as long as the get paid a little for it. Especially
> when it's as simple as offering an incomplete transaction with the
> appropriate SIGHASH flags.
Like many things, the fact that they need to negotiate the right at all
is a *huge* barrier to smaller mining operations, as well as being an
attractive point of control for regulators.
> a part of the reason I like this idea is because it will allow stakeholde=
rs
> a degree of influence on how large the fees are. At least from the surfac=
e,
> it looks like incentives are pretty well matched. They have an incentive =
to
> not let the fees drop too low so the network continues to be usable and
> they also have an incentive to not raise them too high because it'll push
> users into using other systems. Also, there'll be competition between
> stakeholders, which should keep the fees reasonable.
If you want to allow stakeholders influence you should look into John Dillo=
n's
proof-of-stake blocksize voting scheme:
http://www.mail-archive.com/bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net/msg02=
323.html
--=20
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
00000000000000000e7980aab9c096c46e7f34c43a661c5cb2ea71525ebb8af7
--6BvahUXLYAruDZOj
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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==
=uHlD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--6BvahUXLYAruDZOj--
|
