1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
|
Return-Path: <nadahalli@gmail.com>
Received: from silver.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56F6CC0733
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 3 Jul 2020 10:45:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by silver.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C26920116
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 3 Jul 2020 10:45:11 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
Received: from silver.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id migGdMW7pOVW
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 3 Jul 2020 10:45:10 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pg1-f181.google.com (mail-pg1-f181.google.com
[209.85.215.181])
by silver.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EE721FCB5
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 3 Jul 2020 10:45:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pg1-f181.google.com with SMTP id d4so14936385pgk.4
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 03 Jul 2020 03:45:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=dwf26+ScsuN/8IVMgKlgoZonXQqC2TMFq/9za7tT88c=;
b=mkah2nXNzpmEjABCKIcx4ON5safyyTphUpV+SSJz1B7swBmzaePSVDl1QiFz+lvJIt
7kqj3V1l+vtpE3+rxh8WYqQVwKwaBJim/GTZu8q/LGj5aWjHZGDG6fJ7h3QtRHC09dNz
4wcdYB+kEeOO8xoYTmo/CU0nvSG9tF7+hqYgDZv/TxPr/39uapBas4tCJntWA/MpEocF
kfsur9A3VtLQggvcS6vEYcGuRRhpdDwGwXNtiGhntQEytpEVd7zsxyEJU474Fd1rsMBd
YFe0RELcVT6v/Tt7LSG3Tm78UMePSDJGDMzQRFaLehCqXy/5W8T/TGeizYrMkF4Cnqil
PMow==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=dwf26+ScsuN/8IVMgKlgoZonXQqC2TMFq/9za7tT88c=;
b=TzFZYOZkn0rDEQAkZtnn4qJ7Dm9+X2ACWf8nqxhPaoWT/BhJtf/QQbTMushq7xVh+K
Y+m83ZssrCaSOKXesHZIo2vF4cU/NIIGfUGliAcjDFKG4SYjXNnEa3o90ts4U1Am6sya
Rr+oe7D0VEaGYuluhff0V++L5+GrbKnbehgXLYJ0RXgorHZE9Y9WUfwYhCmccTAB6uns
iyymkhpTjCnjbHeGBKdYCKz6sANoJaHqnq7HPCzIIDwND1tCV7i96sl1yn7r0pqYLotY
eyJJ4M1oOPKz4moC8fw0qIygSgWqzsef5lP/JkNBn1temSlxb77kz9Zv6/I/M4S9hQoh
vEKw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533VvpfVQgM+ypnnlFIPtRT8fuZV1XmSuGK6D2v6jbCZIsTVSoES
pi89RFjp1NxBfVlTJjerTmFXkVr10D7ATTsbITA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwc0thw0CgXKBqZq0W/PBT7WZE+WKYC030qoY4AlSe304e143A0Ii2ZbBdrwr97QWuqXLPNZJPmYG3DlzWNTFo=
X-Received: by 2002:a65:52c2:: with SMTP id z2mr29345878pgp.419.1593773110231;
Fri, 03 Jul 2020 03:45:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABT1wW=X35HRVGuP-BHUhDrkBEw27+-iDkNnHWjRU-1mRkn0JQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CABT1wW=KWtoo6zHs8=yUQ7vAYcFSdAzdpDJ9yfw6sJrLd6dN5A@mail.gmail.com>
<20200628121517.f3l2mjcy7x4566v3@ganymede>
<WYQRrIi65yvBWc9qsqCxHWadrMFtYPh2wI-IzVS15FBTFmpIXqHwj5yrj3Igpr-9sKygWsH4DkI_maWcULKKQb51Xp_xZBvKuPF_HmCvqb4=@protonmail.com>
<CAAifmATmQSUUsEbouVYTNNMu-BT8vQiGvh3jwLNK4CUB11s7mg@mail.gmail.com>
<Fh70O0CqbkbLaOUEqRzIG3MOOZi_tYz69xRDPlIlF5tgTIPdYF9LyeoJjypo-agN9-WkuoXJD896R6CQygTozeHA_CFULp3k7007PioaDrs=@protonmail.com>
<CAAifmARxvG+_Wo3zba6MCd=jxwesb2JhWAwRErq6QPVTe1AQEA@mail.gmail.com>
<YhzMZ419vB1BY4Opd3lwfSSJ6_4AIQUDDtZPPhyB2HgskDZv0DKCQlEOAFklskLp1mj5AZrI43VPXOslX25MO-3Fijl9pBWrWYlYiaERr70=@protonmail.com>
<CAAifmATpg21K=yvi8OaPgr2esdtciu_uNLmNbA8983iht7Ru_Q@mail.gmail.com>
<-R0O_3IqpmbxNSONd1A2peCnpEIRs73ZELJgsBf06ygq4BGMo3Hg9h4OlXiGuIUyaITWixSY7LlgVyJ2MkAFQb7Y6I1gC8AXiAeS7eMlSso=@protonmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <-R0O_3IqpmbxNSONd1A2peCnpEIRs73ZELJgsBf06ygq4BGMo3Hg9h4OlXiGuIUyaITWixSY7LlgVyJ2MkAFQb7Y6I1gC8AXiAeS7eMlSso=@protonmail.com>
From: Tejaswi Nadahalli <nadahalli@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 12:44:59 +0200
Message-ID: <CAAifmASfZbw3KgRBwbZoXwUmfpXGyaForwbVnh+KsB3+5s+WAg@mail.gmail.com>
To: ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001689e405a9873817"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 03 Jul 2020 10:46:27 +0000
Cc: Matan Yehieli <matany@campus.technion.ac.il>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
Itay Tsabary <sitay@campus.technion.ac.il>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] MAD-HTLC
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2020 10:45:11 -0000
--0000000000001689e405a9873817
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 12:17 PM ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com> wrote:
>
> > In fact, one rule of thumb might be that wherever watchtowers are
> required, a timelocked bribe might be possible.
>
> I think a better heuristic is that, if the logic of the construction
> assumes "transaction with earlier locktime supersedes transaction with
> later locktime", then it is timelocked-bribery-vulnerable.
>
That's true by definition. Timelocked bribes are, well, going to be
possible when there are timelocks. I was going more for an "indirect clue"
that wherever a watchtower is proposed, a timelocked bribe is possible.
This is entirely a pedantic point :-)
--0000000000001689e405a9873817
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr">On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 12:17 PM ZmnSCPxj =
<<a href=3D"mailto:ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com">ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com</a>&=
gt; wrote:<br></div><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_q=
uote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,2=
04);padding-left:1ex"><br>
> In fact, one rule of thumb might be that wherever watchtowers are requ=
ired, a timelocked bribe might be possible.=C2=A0<br>
<br>
I think a better heuristic is that, if the logic of the construction assume=
s "transaction with earlier locktime supersedes transaction with later=
locktime", then it is timelocked-bribery-vulnerable.<br></blockquote>=
<div><br></div><div>That's true by definition. Timelocked bribes are, w=
ell, going to be possible when there are timelocks. I was going more for an=
"indirect clue" that wherever a watchtower is proposed, a timelo=
cked bribe is possible. This is entirely a pedantic point :-)</div></div></=
div>
--0000000000001689e405a9873817--
|
