1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
|
Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6317A88
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 14 Feb 2017 12:33:23 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from outmail148095.authsmtp.com (outmail148095.authsmtp.com
[62.13.148.95])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A045717E
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 14 Feb 2017 12:33:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-c247.authsmtp.com (mail-c247.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.247])
by punt22.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id v1ECXLLh009471;
Tue, 14 Feb 2017 12:33:21 GMT
Received: from petertodd.org (ec2-52-5-185-120.compute-1.amazonaws.com
[52.5.185.120]) (authenticated bits=0)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id v1ECXJ3U021853
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Tue, 14 Feb 2017 12:33:19 GMT
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by petertodd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B20C640092;
Tue, 14 Feb 2017 12:33:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id EECC12023C; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 07:33:17 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 07:33:17 -0500
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Staf Verhaegen <staf@stafverhaegen.be>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Message-ID: <20170214123317.GA8613@savin.petertodd.org>
References: <CAGCNRJqNg9-aYG62OxTz5RJyx+JJkx-kt2odooZWs92f5teZiw@mail.gmail.com>
<201702030024.10232.luke@dashjr.org>
<CAGLBAhdzPOC6MppMyuL6SwnoY_D829ZRs78pTF47k3rnHPjE1A@mail.gmail.com>
<CAMBsKS9Jmah6jc-pYNNOmJSJS+mHSJ9PchWnQ=BixX0C-hg4ig@mail.gmail.com>
<CAGCNRJpgvoyjKR8RcsOacWD0YboVK+enFPEV+heXFZp9Svau_A@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAcC9yuzgKWGXxbZLM+21pvRZmYV+nDAMBWMpZXCg6RUYHXRWQ@mail.gmail.com>
<1486828666.21100.115.camel@stafverhaegen.be>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1486828666.21100.115.camel@stafverhaegen.be>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-Server-Quench: c48971bb-f2b1-11e6-bcdf-0015176ca198
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
aAdMdwYUHlAWAgsB AmEbWlZeU157W2M7 bghPaBtcak9QXgdq
T0pMXVMcUgQdcnR7 BXseUBh6cgYIfXt3 ZwgxWnhSW0UoJ1sr
QBxVCGwHMGF9OjNL Bl1YdwJRcQRMLU5E Y1gxNiYHcQ5VPz4z
GA41ejw8IwAXGxxP T0QnDGonCW0MGzsh QREeDH0EGkseSiMo
MgduFFkAHUAeen4j KkcsXDp/
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1038:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 52.5.185.120/25
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Pre-BIP] Community Consensus Voting System
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 12:33:23 -0000
--UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 04:57:46PM +0100, Staf Verhaegen via bitcoin-dev wr=
ote:
> Chris Priest via bitcoin-dev schreef op vr 03-02-2017 om 16:57 [-0800]:
> > Personally I think once the blocksize arguments are solved, there will
> > be no more contentious changes for this voting system to deal with.
> > What other contentious issues have come up in the past 3 years or so
> > that wasn't blocksize/scaling related? Do other protocols like TCP/IP
> > and the HTTP protocol have developers arguing every day over issues no
> > one can agree on?
>=20
> Yes, DRM for example.
=2E..and note how, like blocksize, the roots of the DRM argument at W3C are=
n't a
technical disagreement, but rather a political disagreement.
--=20
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
--UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJYovkJAAoJECSBQD2l8JH7J2AH/jEzfNiiNadffW8qMKUtHzYk
omQwh4gIe8k0UUm8cW6AB2h0+Z2/7n/+K5L8V/+GcJ6ONTmrNZkRTB3YHgYq39mC
Bc2i1tG/XwA/xvo+mOSYTcNwkA0cSjl/SiDUUvqUBOvQMNB5lJbEXx2kjbCNdf+2
sn2aYvp2FM6/3JHx/L6/ZIGT/AdPOkI4zIsb+Go3No28HS5dl886R05ItNg0e6HF
DiTnQJ32Ywsotd2OCsO+Q1g0yEi8tq7h5mMubBIL8K0AaohqgZ9czbHnS5v0Js+8
6EwKFC5vhiSwT2SK9L+GYtLqsnlEe9aTJmP8nFUWp1RxTPZ5Cbe8WhcGv5ypa30=
=+2Zm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2--
|
