1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
|
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <pw@vps7135.xlshosting.net>) id 1TR4U7-0003TN-Od
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 24 Oct 2012 17:11:15 +0000
X-ACL-Warn:
Received: from vps7135.xlshosting.net ([178.18.90.41])
by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
id 1TR4U3-0006xD-Ez for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 24 Oct 2012 17:11:15 +0000
Received: by vps7135.xlshosting.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id C47EA494008; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 19:11:05 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 19:11:05 +0200
From: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
To: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
Message-ID: <20121024171104.GA31766@vps7135.xlshosting.net>
References: <CANEZrP0XALwBFJyZTzYd5xBp4MRrjv0s_y2tOXbO7UgjWF2HzA@mail.gmail.com>
<20121024162255.GA30290@vps7135.xlshosting.net>
<CANEZrP1sxtOb+czMtBTkmzngEwMYRqD667WyKQkAOKLi+mGBGQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CANEZrP1sxtOb+czMtBTkmzngEwMYRqD667WyKQkAOKLi+mGBGQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-PGP-Key: http://sipa.ulyssis.org/pubkey.asc
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(pieter.wuille[at]gmail.com)
0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is
CUSTOM_MED
-0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
domain 1.2 NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED ADSP custom_med hit,
and not from a mailing list
X-Headers-End: 1TR4U3-0006xD-Ez
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Draft BIP for Bloom filtering
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 17:11:15 -0000
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 06:35:08PM +0200, Mike Hearn wrote:
> > * what does "each hash and key in the output script" mean exactly? what
> about the output script in its entirety?
>
> It's an informal way to say data elements. If you insert a key then it
> matches both single and multi sig outputs regardless of location.
So all data push operations? Including or excluding 1-byte constants?
What about the entire output script? (if I want to match just one particular multisig output script)
>
> > * is sharing parts of the merkle branches not worth it?
>
> We think probably not.
I'm not sure. As soon as you have 129 transactions in a block (including coinbase), you need 8 path
entries for each included transaction, which requires more bytes than the transaction itself.
When you're including M out of N transactions of a block, you never need more than N-M path entries
in total to reconstruct the merkle root. With the proposed format, it requires M*ceil(log2(N)).
For a 1000-transaction block, when matching ~everything, you need >300 KiB of overhead, while almost
nothing is required.
--
Pieter
|
