1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
|
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <gmaxwell@gmail.com>) id 1UF9ap-0004XV-CW
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 11 Mar 2013 20:45:12 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.215.52 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.215.52; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com;
helo=mail-la0-f52.google.com;
Received: from mail-la0-f52.google.com ([209.85.215.52])
by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1UF9an-00016Q-8U
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 11 Mar 2013 20:45:11 +0000
Received: by mail-la0-f52.google.com with SMTP id fs12so4443728lab.11
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:45:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.42.37 with SMTP id k5mr5122238lbl.49.1363034702481; Mon,
11 Mar 2013 13:45:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.96.164 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:45:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAH2=CKyyjPoOTHS6bE7TBCE4UGXf+qnGv0xq-eSHg-iXMH2Rqw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1363030071-26731-1-git-send-email-runesvend@gmail.com>
<201303111935.55767.luke@dashjr.org>
<CAH2=CKyyjPoOTHS6bE7TBCE4UGXf+qnGv0xq-eSHg-iXMH2Rqw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:45:02 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgQ8rGwKM6rqyMzMu-KaL_Kj5P5-bMJqaR+o=YW7ShJN9w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Rune_Kj=C3=A6r_Svendsen?= <runesvend@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(gmaxwell[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1UF9an-00016Q-8U
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] [PATCH] Change recommended fee to 0.001
BTC
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 20:45:12 -0000
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Rune Kj=C3=A6r Svendsen <runesvend@gmail.c=
om> wrote:
> The question is if we should define a new value, that we use solely to
> display in this text, or if we should use MIN_TX_FEE or MIN_RELAY_TX_FEE =
in
> some way. What are the dev's thoughts?
It should be a new value.
|
