1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
|
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <marek@palatinus.cz>) id 1TVpl2-0007B2-UG
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 06 Nov 2012 20:28:24 +0000
X-ACL-Warn:
Received: from mail-ie0-f175.google.com ([209.85.223.175])
by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1TVpl2-0008DR-2N
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 06 Nov 2012 20:28:24 +0000
Received: by mail-ie0-f175.google.com with SMTP id c13so1299495ieb.34
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Tue, 06 Nov 2012 12:28:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=google.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type
:x-gm-message-state;
bh=Qor1XmzQFxvLqj5DSdX4GdSwpL14+HyARkYnfYEXqQQ=;
b=ZjTd7BasyIz8Io2iAU+MhrZc7XzFaNv6kgKaM4ZYNJgCL54rTwRm/gB8JCxmcFAvq3
trOCa6D9XiZtTCvHYYdgk3Dxvlto3Ibr5lw94/tUsZAlDbRGNiUzvV7bH48is5gSmWPj
pbtUKXFUTwjYBFX+G3Y6qfhldLjUS2CpC3VZJXYbnC44cdC+b7EbPk0v5AWBUGXa+SRC
rgFJRo9Z6ivrCL8Gdg54/C3H1iQPQihTH9wY1aR0t8mMh6+fQlwhMjJxQxexLjc/Ld0g
oOyikM8WgodhrmO0+mGPcfp9UMVp9+KtozXOHfozIHoX7XOyf+mNLLVc90jjYgN56IZe
sXTw==
Received: by 10.50.36.200 with SMTP id s8mr14255085igj.25.1352231813478; Tue,
06 Nov 2012 11:56:53 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: marek@palatinus.cz
Received: by 10.64.51.103 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 11:56:23 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <201211061913.35016.luke@dashjr.org>
References: <CABsx9T1K+XKr=OT5TC4d1KiQ_kXH+giCWHPiS=t7-NyVOmGTDw@mail.gmail.com>
<201211061913.35016.luke@dashjr.org>
From: slush <slush@centrum.cz>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 19:56:23 +0000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: UZhD4qCEpcrUX95ccGQdJcYe_Yc
Message-ID: <CAJna-Hh3+CChAXeEgjzOvHiamOAUY2da9iQb4AcaxYynp6GJyg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae9340827e57b2404cdd900b6
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQndhwv/hweNzh7ax5PKcGtO5c2ZtWcDeeea5UtXwaelqfUE0IbFbr+1NegW87bkFK99s9Jz
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(slush[at]centrum.cz)
1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
X-Headers-End: 1TVpl2-0008DR-2N
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] IRC meeting agenda, 18:00 UTC Thursday
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 20:28:25 -0000
--14dae9340827e57b2404cdd900b6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org> wrote:
> But more important to the success of BIP today, I think, is encouraging
> wider
> community participation.
It's not about BIP process, it's possibly about content of particular
proposals.
> The stratum mining mess seems to be a direct result
There's no mess with stratum mining, except in your head. There's no
requirement to have BIP for everything what people do. Stratum is NOT
related to bitcoin protocol or bitcoin implementation, it is just custom,
pooled-mining extension and bitcoin network doesn't need to know about
Stratum existence at all.
> and lack of any peer review/contribution toward the stratum protocol.
There have been peer review of the protocol. You wanted to say "I was not
invited to do peer review", right?
Please don't start it AGAIN and stop bashing Stratum in your posts, at
least in bitcoin-dev mailing list.
I promised to write BIP draft for Stratum, I proposed and implemented
get_transactions method to allow Stratum jobs inspection. What more do you
want, seriously? I'm soo tired by you, Luke.
slush
P.S. I'm sorry that other developers had to read such posts. I'll try to
sit on my hands next time.
--14dae9340827e57b2404cdd900b6
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Luke-Jr <span di=
r=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:luke@dashjr.org" target=3D"_blank">luke@das=
hjr.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D=
"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class=3D"im">But more important to the success of BIP today, I think, =
is encouraging wider</div>
community participation.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>It's not about=
BIP process, it's possibly about content of particular proposals.</div=
><div>=A0</div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex=
;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
The stratum mining mess seems to be a direct result</blockquote><div><br></=
div><div>There's no mess with stratum mining, except in your head. Ther=
e's no requirement to have BIP for everything what people do. Stratum i=
s NOT related to bitcoin protocol or bitcoin implementation, it is just cus=
tom, pooled-mining extension and bitcoin network doesn't need to know a=
bout Stratum existence at all.</div>
<div>=A0</div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;=
border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">and lack of any peer review/co=
ntribution toward=A0the stratum protocol.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>T=
here have been peer review of the protocol. You wanted to say "I was n=
ot invited to do peer review", right?</div>
<div><br></div><div>Please don't start it AGAIN and stop bashing Stratu=
m in your posts, at least in bitcoin-dev mailing list.</div><div><br></div>=
<div>I promised to write BIP draft for Stratum, I proposed and implemented =
get_transactions method to allow Stratum jobs inspection. What more do you =
want, seriously?=A0I'm soo tired by you, Luke.</div>
<div><br></div><div>slush</div><div><br></div><div>P.S. I'm sorry that =
other developers had to read such posts. I'll try to sit on my hands ne=
xt time.</div></div>
--14dae9340827e57b2404cdd900b6--
|
