1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
|
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <laanwj@gmail.com>) id 1VoqvD-0001LB-EF
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Fri, 06 Dec 2013 08:38:03 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.214.45 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.214.45; envelope-from=laanwj@gmail.com;
helo=mail-bk0-f45.google.com;
Received: from mail-bk0-f45.google.com ([209.85.214.45])
by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1VoqvC-0001qr-E2
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Fri, 06 Dec 2013 08:38:03 +0000
Received: by mail-bk0-f45.google.com with SMTP id mx13so178723bkb.18
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Fri, 06 Dec 2013 00:37:56 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.205.105.3 with SMTP id do3mr699115bkc.86.1386319075984; Fri,
06 Dec 2013 00:37:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.204.69.197 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 00:37:55 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <52A139F0.2080401@petersson.at>
References: <52A139F0.2080401@petersson.at>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 09:37:55 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+s+GJAUDE_rqrj2tHK75j58mCvwnD5oTnCTYFRovzxfSxoQiQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Wladimir <laanwj@gmail.com>
To: Andreas Petersson <andreas@petersson.at>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d041fa2a911ed6104ecd990f0
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(laanwj[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
for more information. [URIs: petersson.at]
1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1VoqvC-0001qr-E2
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Temporary fee fix
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 08:38:03 -0000
--f46d041fa2a911ed6104ecd990f0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:44 AM, Andreas Petersson <andreas@petersson.at>wrote:
> I know we should all be brainstorming and working on a new fee market.
> But fact is, it will still take some time and in the meantime users will
> continue to shout insults at us for the high "fixed" fee of 0,1 mBtc.
> Even banks sometimes have less fees. (1 of 5 Play Store reviews of
> Mycelium seem to mention high fees recently)
>
> My suggestion: until the market is established let's lower the minimum
> relay fee per kb to something less. 0,01 mBtc comes to mind. (of course
> pulling this number out of thin air)
>
This was considered (see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/3305) but
deemed to risky for 0.8.6 at the last moment, see the linked pull request
for details.
It will go into 0.9, at least if the full floating fee implementation isn't
yet ready and deemed safe by then.
Wladimir
--f46d041fa2a911ed6104ecd990f0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quo=
te">On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:44 AM, Andreas Petersson <span dir=3D"ltr"><=
;<a href=3D"mailto:andreas@petersson.at" target=3D"_blank">andreas@petersso=
n.at</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-=
left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;p=
adding-left:1ex">I know we should all be brainstorming and working on a new=
fee market.<br>
But fact is, it will still take some time and in the meantime users will<br=
>
continue to shout insults at us for the high "fixed" fee of 0,1 m=
Btc.<br>
Even banks sometimes have less fees. (1 of 5 Play Store reviews of<br>
Mycelium seem to mention high fees recently)<br>
<br>
My suggestion: until the market is established let's lower the minimum<=
br>
relay fee per kb to something less. 0,01 mBtc comes to mind. (of course<br>
pulling this number out of thin air)<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Th=
is was considered (see=C2=A0<a href=3D"https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/p=
ull/3305">https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/3305</a>) but deemed to r=
isky for 0.8.6 at the last moment, see the linked pull request for details.=
<br>
</div><div><br></div><div>It will go into 0.9, at least if the full floatin=
g fee implementation isn't yet ready and deemed safe by then.</div><div=
><br></div><div>Wladimir</div><div><br></div></div></div></div>
--f46d041fa2a911ed6104ecd990f0--
|
