1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <tamas@bitsofproof.com>) id 1YLpeq-0003qA-9E
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 12 Feb 2015 09:02:00 +0000
X-ACL-Warn:
Received: from wp059.webpack.hosteurope.de ([80.237.132.66])
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.76) id 1YLpel-00077C-Qx
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 12 Feb 2015 09:02:00 +0000
Received: from [37.143.74.116] (helo=[192.168.0.100]); authenticated
by wp059.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa
(TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
id 1YLpef-00035v-L4; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 10:01:49 +0100
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="Apple-Mail=_71DE5F15-FDF7-4CF9-8093-91870588E633";
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Tamas Blummer <tamas@bitsofproof.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150212084954.GB22743@savin.petertodd.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 10:01:48 +0100
Message-Id: <BFFB2E15-0F50-46B7-9C26-D9F85A00744A@bitsofproof.com>
References: <20150212064719.GA6563@savin.petertodd.org>
<7C171F0B-1EF8-4542-8E18-187B2E94DF14@bitsofproof.com>
<20150212074509.GC4254@savin.petertodd.org>
<8BFAFE6A-F85B-4B89-98A0-CBBCAA67B30B@bitsofproof.com>
<20150212084954.GB22743@savin.petertodd.org>
To: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de; tamas@bitsofproof.com; 1423731715;
c8d7ab60;
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust [80.237.132.66 listed in list.dnswl.org]
1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
X-Headers-End: 1YLpel-00077C-Qx
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 09:02:00 -0000
--Apple-Mail=_71DE5F15-FDF7-4CF9-8093-91870588E633
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="Apple-Mail=_544871C1-72A3-4BA1-911B-2EFF3543143A"
--Apple-Mail=_544871C1-72A3-4BA1-911B-2EFF3543143A
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
On Feb 12, 2015, at 9:49 AM, Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> wrote:
>=20
> How does my replace-by-fee patch *not* do that?
Does it broadcast a double spend only if it IS replacing an earlier? If =
yes, I am fine with it.
Tamas Blummer
--Apple-Mail=_544871C1-72A3-4BA1-911B-2EFF3543143A
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/html;
charset=us-ascii
<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><div><br></div><div>On Feb 12, 2015, at 9:49 AM, Peter Todd <<a href="mailto:pete@petertodd.org">pete@petertodd.org</a>> wrote:</div><blockquote type="cite"><br>How does my replace-by-fee patch *not* do that?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Does it broadcast a double spend only if it IS replacing an earlier? If yes, I am fine with it.</div><div><br></div><div apple-content-edited="true">
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;">Tamas Blummer</div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><br></div></div></body></html>
--Apple-Mail=_544871C1-72A3-4BA1-911B-2EFF3543143A--
--Apple-Mail=_71DE5F15-FDF7-4CF9-8093-91870588E633
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJU3Gv8AAoJEPZykcUXcTkc8HMH/0TPFOQifQ7urBFuHBXicPNw
jC07VSuB1yZaXCH1qQ+Jlm0dVpq3S8yftsFrZqv086DW+mAxs295LLiHqGsKY1eA
kyF7i6Te1cNmfCghl3oJk1KJWwTgcAReXd4TdN8Y1+sRmlB3lO7zCjYdWLut2Tat
4IxxHhvhzTQEleFdV0CzfcVt0hvTTFkXTRiiPMhsbfztQ/sJyKrfF+sCslOsR5Y6
QqF3NAJimiIxpFe4hAYelZL1ZCWSVB3I4Dm+d9y6sC1nHmU2MqoS6p5F60a+ysjt
2zqHdSe+csHOzpnJPwyy8KyeH0Udlmxqf9dPZc+ccVJsSswfUil21queaESfUeY=
=Gs0K
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Apple-Mail=_71DE5F15-FDF7-4CF9-8093-91870588E633--
|
