1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
|
Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21778905
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 15 Jul 2016 16:31:24 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from outmail149055.authsmtp.co.uk (outmail149055.authsmtp.co.uk
[62.13.149.55])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 505CA1A7
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 15 Jul 2016 16:31:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-c232.authsmtp.com (mail-c232.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.232])
by punt21.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id u6FGVGM8067344;
Fri, 15 Jul 2016 17:31:16 +0100 (BST)
Received: from petertodd.org (ec2-52-5-185-120.compute-1.amazonaws.com
[52.5.185.120]) (authenticated bits=0)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id u6FGVDvn053019
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Fri, 15 Jul 2016 17:31:14 +0100 (BST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by petertodd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 309E6400E9;
Fri, 15 Jul 2016 16:28:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 933052059F; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 12:31:12 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 12:31:12 -0400
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Message-ID: <20160715163112.GA9125@fedora-21-dvm>
References: <201607151608.52063.luke@dashjr.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <201607151608.52063.luke@dashjr.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-Server-Quench: 8c770d3a-4aa9-11e6-829e-00151795d556
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
aAdMdwcUEkAYAgsB AmAbWlNeU1x7WGc7 bghPaBtcak9QXgdq
T0pMXVMcUQMednp1 QEAeVxpydgwIf3ty bQhqDXdcXBB5JFt5
Ex9dCGwHMGF9YGIW BV1YdwJRcQRDe0tA b1YxNiYHcQ5VPz4z
GA41ejw8IwAXEzhc XhwWZU8KTU8XEyV0 SRcYVR8OJQVUA21t
f1hucwdGWA4YNEl6 aAJ6Mf9/
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1037:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 52.5.185.120/25
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Status updates for BIP 9, 68, 112, and 113
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 16:31:24 -0000
--nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 04:08:51PM +0000, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Daniel Cousens opened the issue a few weeks ago, that BIP 9 should progre=
ss to=20
> Accepted stage. However, as an informational BIP, it is not entirely clea=
r on=20
> whether it falls in the Draft/Accepted/Final classification of proposals=
=20
> requiring implementation, or the Draft/Active classification like process=
=20
> BIPs. Background of this discussion is at:
> https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/413
> (Discussion on the GitHub BIPs repo is *NOT* recommended, hence bringing =
this=20
> topic to the mailing list)
As of writing the text of BIP68 says:
'This BIP is to be deployed by "versionbits" BIP9 using bit 0.'
Essentially including BIP9 as part of the BIP68 standard; BIP68 could have
equally been written by including some or all of the text of BIP9. If it had
done that, that text would be part of a "Standard BIP" rather than
"Informational BIP", thus I'll argue that BIP9 should also be a "Standard B=
IP"
Also, note that if we ever modified BIP9, we'd most likely do so with a new
BIP, and in soft-forks using that new standard, would refer to the new BIP =
#.
> Reviewing the criteria for status changes, my opinion is that:
> - BIPs 68, 112, 113, and 141 are themselves implementations of BIP 9
> -- therefore, BIP 9 falls under the Draft/Accepted/Final class
> - BIPs 68, 112, and 113 have been deployed to the network successfully
> -- therefore, BIP 9 has satisfied the conditions of not only Accepted sta=
tus,
> but also Final status
> -- therefore, BIPs 68, 112, and 113 also ought to be Final status
>=20
> If there are no objections, I plan to update the status to Final for BIPs=
9,=20
> 68, 112, and 113 in one month. Since all four BIPs are currently Draft, I=
also=20
> need at least one author from each BIP to sign-off on promoting them to (=
and=20
> beyond) Accepted.
>=20
> BIP 9: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
> Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
> Greg Maxwell <greg@xiph.org>
> Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
ACK "Final" status.
--=20
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
--nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXiQ/NAAoJEGOZARBE6K+yagsH/2xlz8aAhmZ3uu7khgIsuwzE
A2YO+xdw62LcxTcBqyMBMTQwDGr/eRcftZo5/ClpAHIyBXLqpCf/ITQfraMVsxih
lThnrqSP0+GJPYyNZFBTwRsVvp2ja1RIbVJrcGktDjve90452VTEyI5pjtmcjJba
3CWU4p9/etMqsnEXLpB+qfztTsOd6yXMHGuKrrm441EG9cE/g3ijxi0bOhNE1sn5
4Ed3fEoxi5xZdnClb06P/FGt8L9vNo0UYKAaK1OF4qbPC8ubSSch18yU8AG25YdA
B9/MFeFtf1qK2siZtusfVlZzsuMqXqm2ggBgd4XjdSR2wEmj75XDeiI5ZHfgdRw=
=gwGj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j--
|
