1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
|
Return-Path: <sergio.d.lerner@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3407594D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 7 Aug 2015 23:08:43 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ob0-f170.google.com (mail-ob0-f170.google.com
[209.85.214.170])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 675DD23D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 7 Aug 2015 23:08:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by obdeg2 with SMTP id eg2so89684098obd.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:08:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=8WmggbzRFzNei+dzhyoqIHNbYeE0N6wZaJvYqncKMpM=;
b=yZZ1FEOjBOLQDjwYP2ZQIR2dYCH7Ge7DRvaVK6BlgJrPSBW9MEz+rqwiaa+rePxPYJ
UAjFKNdEQhWvIGq6T4iSmgAO6jD2Wzsk7MDshrZD1U1aTExdn+FCsFuKC87CTcxqKjPK
y7EvaOzWbuvOeZP9NIx9jnA7FBnsMg9k3YML1XYlMayxl9eJ8bwJoSHEJkkqNP1N1C88
QmxfJjVqK3e86oNHN+HzjoiswCuwYqJeGlVI3HSLoqxojTFCB8httE7eRtJf8CEI40M3
moCOOo7ScSUSw1apLshobKyAvvhZ/hluFoyICZVaAjdHQuDWO9tB30gplPH5vLnkpKpc
zB0w==
X-Received: by 10.60.74.2 with SMTP id p2mr8911320oev.57.1438988921881; Fri,
07 Aug 2015 16:08:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.202.116.207 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 16:08:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAAt2M19Hp-rXbqTvQN8A24Ojmc=8O0agbaAD5hLOj1zt-Rf+-A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKzdR-o7_A2N=-=3muXcs7ptnoO2d3wSBAMAziNGs7XjnceGBQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAOG=w-sCULNw=C75iot=6q4Yb16VvYh=F4DahS3ZEkEpGLvu3w@mail.gmail.com>
<CAKzdR-qpJzWoUVNUuhPh5sQQc2w-JZP9BqX4hRZG4c8_xujxQA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAt2M19Hp-rXbqTvQN8A24Ojmc=8O0agbaAD5hLOj1zt-Rf+-A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Sergio Demian Lerner <sergio.d.lerner@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 20:08:02 -0300
Message-ID: <CAKzdR-ofEnFxUeGSNyMLKrbFu6F8qoYnDaf=gWvwWu_b0+AXWg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Natanael <natanael.l@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11360288864cd5051cc0b782
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Arnoud Kouwenhoven - Pukaki Corp via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] If you had a single chance to double the
transactions/second Bitcoin allows...
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 23:08:43 -0000
--001a11360288864cd5051cc0b782
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
In some rare occasions in everyday life, what matters is seconds. Like when
paying for parking in the car while some other cars are behind you in the
line. You don't want them to get upset.
I takes me tens of minutes to shop. But once you choose your merchandise
and your payment starts processing, if the payment system allows several
payments to be pending simultaneously and you're not blocking the next
person to pay, then I don't care waiting some minutes for confirmation. But
saving 10 minutes of confirmation is a lot.
I ague that our time is mostly measured in minutes (but I don't have any
sociological, cultural, genetic or anthropological evidence). It takes
minutes to read an e-mail, minutes to correct a bug, minutes to have lunch,
minutes to drive to the office, minutes to talk to your kids. A payment
taking 1 minute is much better than a payment taking 10. If I could choose
a single thing to change to Bitcoin, I would lower the payment time, even
within the minute scale.
Sergio
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 7:46 PM, Natanael <natanael.l@gmail.com> wrote:
> Den 7 aug 2015 23:37 skrev "Sergio Demian Lerner via bitcoin-dev" <
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>:
> >
> > Mark,
> > It took you 3 minutes to respond to my e-mail. And I responded to you 4
> minutes later. If you had responded to me in 10 minutes, I would be of out
> the office and we wouldn't have this dialogue. So 5 minutes is a lot of
> time.
> >
> > Obviously this is not a technical response to the technical issues you
> argue. But "minutes" is a time scale we humans use to measure time very
> often.
>
> But what's more likely to matter is seconds. What you need then is some
> variant of multisignature notaries (Greenaddress.it, lightning network),
> where the combination of economic incentives and legal liability gives you
> the assurance of doublespend protection from the time of publication of the
> transaction to the first block confirmation.
>
--001a11360288864cd5051cc0b782
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">In some rare occasions in everyday life, what matters is s=
econds. Like when paying for parking in the car while some other cars are b=
ehind you in the line. You don't want them to get upset.=C2=A0<div><br>=
<div><div>I takes me tens of minutes to shop. But once you choose your merc=
handise and your payment starts processing, if the payment system allows se=
veral payments to be pending simultaneously and you're not blocking the=
next person to pay, then I don't care waiting some minutes for confirm=
ation. But saving 10 minutes of confirmation is a lot.</div><div><br></div>=
<div>I ague that our time is mostly measured in minutes (but I don't ha=
ve any sociological, cultural, genetic or anthropological evidence). It tak=
es minutes to read an e-mail, minutes to correct a bug, minutes to have lun=
ch, minutes to drive to the office, minutes to talk to your kids. A payment=
taking 1 minute is much better than a payment taking 10. If I could choose=
a single thing to change to Bitcoin, I would lower the payment time, even =
within the minute scale.</div><div><br></div><div>Sergio</div><div><div><br=
></div><div><br></div></div></div></div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><b=
r><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 7:46 PM, Natanael <span=
dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:natanael.l@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">=
natanael.l@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_qu=
ote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex=
"><span class=3D""><p dir=3D"ltr">Den 7 aug 2015 23:37 skrev "Sergio D=
emian Lerner via bitcoin-dev" <<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.=
linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.or=
g</a>>:<br>
><br>
> Mark,<br>
> It took you 3 minutes to respond to my e-mail. And I responded to you =
4 minutes later. If you had responded to me in 10 minutes, I would be of ou=
t the office and we wouldn't have this dialogue. So 5 minutes is a lot =
of time.<br>
><br>
> Obviously this is not a technical response to the technical issues you=
argue. But "minutes" is a time scale we humans use to measure ti=
me very often.</p>
</span><p dir=3D"ltr">But what's more likely to matter is seconds. What=
you need then is some variant of multisignature notaries (Greenaddress.it,=
lightning network), where the combination of economic incentives and legal=
liability gives you the assurance of doublespend protection from the time =
of publication of the transaction to the first block confirmation. </p>
</blockquote></div><br></div>
--001a11360288864cd5051cc0b782--
|
