1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
|
Return-Path: <kanzure@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6D9EC70;
Fri, 26 Feb 2016 01:34:25 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-oi0-f52.google.com (mail-oi0-f52.google.com
[209.85.218.52])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F06B20D;
Fri, 26 Feb 2016 01:34:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-oi0-f52.google.com with SMTP id x21so52711213oix.2;
Thu, 25 Feb 2016 17:34:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type; bh=xzpDFnWxVn+xs77Uvl06d9qhtN9gb0zlYwtYi1YrlmQ=;
b=rbTCcVysBLUbChPbUSF4JTWCFwCur4hbjeuqAMoxvseTMWYOTRWf6/Ov6Lvgqr/bGp
b0xDJygNFjEvATsR0W/ycl6y+p9j9/BQdcmMQUn2+kxKuhARAGo40V3wha+Jt2cf++VU
+LT8UxHG5u8kbl1LAa4KyBaLrezhYd5k/6hN6tztKN1MSYe+TjxBpmxG3a9s3ML6buJ2
OIRdZ0g7GDVQcI98tSgbonAnA3shyFaSrN5QILnYSk+QCuEGiBW2cQmJBdFIYbTBjBUQ
uzyGOzXXhV/d0zbtMjYJ9F2Y8ewTFQZ5J7QRQRkNLLorMKxX62MlRUuVElUxCsmlmDh8
P+wQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=xzpDFnWxVn+xs77Uvl06d9qhtN9gb0zlYwtYi1YrlmQ=;
b=LpKkvcLiLLZAP2UqkcAsqTA8tZO57SNcll4b2NXnp2uKSRyLZKe5OGFJDJkshXEtel
JxvJtkSpdhxV5qQilCD5jh+tLxF/iJ4j3O+Ot1gBbtlb0L3WnbtRbDxTHCa8aWHHxEW8
xY6eXxQuOftt8k1W2QJdsbUkcrJEvn+uPNik8R8UQxydsGuOqVkt9ejhJEFRb8+fZllH
PKi114IzXfhYD26n2ASNg2fSM1NH1RKs10aD6SZMayRNCCdlw8XF5LwGr/s/OZ+p+yJy
r2elL5Mq/meX0olFK7cy3Lxldf7LQACcMAAJygKPQ71s0k45wholI0oH77mEisSnwx/1
K8/w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOR17V6demUKUd22nVpngnLfVLIQFEePmNu8sMCu2VnIe221IcRikofGlQeMyZJi9LiYibvqN/TbnLy8OQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.172.149 with SMTP id v143mr37346032oie.121.1456450464779;
Thu, 25 Feb 2016 17:34:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.157.17.117 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 17:34:24 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20160226010746.GB10295@lightning.network>
References: <20160226010746.GB10295@lightning.network>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 19:34:24 -0600
Message-ID: <CABaSBayZ3+UjuzMSuOypiMzB7_5iE3ssD6Pfu3oA0Nnm5tWMPw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com>
To: Joseph Poon <joseph@lightning.network>,
Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
lightning-dev <lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 01:35:35 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] SIGHASH_NOINPUT in Segregated Witness
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 01:34:26 -0000
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 7:07 PM, Joseph Poon wrote:
> This would be achieved using a SIGHASH flag, termed SIGHASH_NOINPUT. It
> does not include as part of the signature, the outpoint being spent
> (txid and index), nor the amount. It however, would include the spent
> outpoint's script as part of the signature. Note that this is just a
Well if you are bothering to draft up a BIP about that SIGHASH flag,
then perhaps also consider some other SIGHASH flag types as well while
you are at it?
Various proposed sighash types:
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-August/010759.html
"Build your own nHashType" proposal draft:
https://github.com/scmorse/bitcoin-misc/blob/master/sighash_proposal.md
jl2012's reply:
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-August/010779.html
petertodd's reply about OP_CODESEPARATOR linked back to this thread
regarding "Build your own nHashType":
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-April/007771.html
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-April/007802.html
http://gnusha.org/bitcoin-wizards/2014-12-09.log
((That particular thread had other replies which can be viewed here:
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-April/thread.html
))
Also, there was a draft implementation of SIGHASH_NOINPUT:
https://github.com/Roasbeef/bitcoin/commit/4b3c3f1baf7985208ceb6887261ee150ab6e3328
https://github.com/Roasbeef/btcd/commit/67830e506fa135d5239177340918cea39909e6a4
FWIW there was some concern about replay using SIGHAHS_NOINPUT or something:
http://gnusha.org/bitcoin-wizards/2015-04-07.log
- Bryan
http://heybryan.org/
1 512 203 0507
|
