1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
|
Return-Path: <vjudeu@gazeta.pl>
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::138])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDC80C0011
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 24 Feb 2022 17:52:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7B2B83E23
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 24 Feb 2022 17:52:49 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org (amavisd-new);
dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gazeta.pl
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id oLuDLWk4kGIL
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 24 Feb 2022 17:52:48 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from smtpo91.poczta.onet.pl (smtpo91.poczta.onet.pl
[213.180.149.144])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B737D83E21
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 24 Feb 2022 17:52:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pmq3v.m5r2.onet (pmq3v.m5r2.onet [10.174.32.69])
by smtp.poczta.onet.pl (Onet) with ESMTP id 4K4L8m5j0FzlhlLD;
Thu, 24 Feb 2022 18:52:40 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gazeta.pl; s=2013;
t=1645725160; bh=QbWAz+Xqz5E3k30LK4huvJavtTWhWDC1pMabhpo2h0w=;
h=From:To:Date:Subject:From;
b=SYbqmDIo/b0Mqy14rh50bLvEZUSTOEdZoWmwjXrfFMgvI8cQ22XmpiIgi1Q1rERaV
tOGURbPB4iQVoDeZVU1Bn9ALS2LxuMORXfPbOKXsdIsF0T4yL5xJidRd2mIeB9Kc6O
pJ4ZvdV5jUBwkb9nqV5Kz3GIef1c4uDmCfHv/tbQ=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="===============2353740516328022801=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from [5.173.241.2] by pmq3v.m5r2.onet via HTTP id ;
Thu, 24 Feb 2022 18:52:40 +0100
From: vjudeu@gazeta.pl
X-Priority: 3
To: Billy Tetrud <billy.tetrud@gmail.com>,
"bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org"
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 18:52:39 +0100
Message-Id: <157676573-26d876ec3baac7f177731a4fa956fb25@pmq3v.m5r2.onet>
X-Mailer: onet.poczta
X-Onet-PMQ: <vjudeu@gazeta.pl>;5.173.241.2;PL;2
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 18:09:01 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Draft-BIP: Ordinal Numbers
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 17:52:50 -0000
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--===============2353740516328022801==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> what happens if/when it comes to pass that we increase payment precision =
by going sub-satoshi on chain?
When we talk about future improvements, there could be even bigger problem =
with ordinal numbers: what if/when we introduce some Monero-like system and=
hide coin amounts? (for example by using zero satoshi, because we have to =
use something that will be backward-compatible). Zero is quite interesting =
amount, because it means "skip amount checking for old clients". That can b=
e used in many ways to introduce many protocols (and also to add fractional=
satoshis on-chain, because 0.4 satoshis could be represented as zero), so =
if that amounts will be simply ignored, then I wonder how it would be possi=
ble to connect some future protocol based on that with ordinal numbers.
--===============2353740516328022801==
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div>> what happens if/when it comes to pass that we increase payment pr=
ecision by going sub-satoshi on chain?<br /><br />When we talk about future=
improvements, there could be even bigger problem with ordinal numbers: wha=
t if/when we introduce some Monero-like system and hide coin amounts? (for =
example by using zero satoshi, because we have to use something that will b=
e backward-compatible). Zero is quite interesting amount, because it means =
"skip amount checking for old clients". That can be used in many ways to in=
troduce many protocols (and also to add fractional satoshis on-chain, becau=
se 0.4 satoshis could be represented as zero), so if that amounts will be s=
imply ignored, then I wonder how it would be possible to connect some futur=
e protocol based on that with ordinal numbers.</div>
--===============2353740516328022801==--
|
