1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
|
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <tamas@bitsofproof.com>) id 1UpaOl-000603-BT
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 20 Jun 2013 08:39:19 +0000
X-ACL-Warn:
Received: from wp059.webpack.hosteurope.de ([80.237.132.66])
by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.76) id 1UpaOj-0006D1-Ek
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 20 Jun 2013 08:39:19 +0000
Received: from [37.143.74.116] (helo=[192.168.1.5]); authenticated
by wp059.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa
(TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
id 1UpaOc-0000nF-L3; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:39:10 +0200
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="Apple-Mail=_4A2B3B2A-66B7-49FC-947F-47A201BD0F89"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
From: Tamas Blummer <tamas@bitsofproof.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANEZrP1rK3z5LXd+q-SRd3pzP5QLoJSL=CMPviH4fFVGKWT69g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:39:10 +0200
Message-Id: <84938F7F-B75C-434B-9B7A-EC406CE42385@bitsofproof.com>
References: <4DE0E45E-BB48-4DFF-9C86-ACBE312B3049@bitsofproof.com>
<CANEZrP1MVKSNU92UrQ36sPCN0LNLKrVRXnfVwEZKhgoBFXatBA@mail.gmail.com>
<E9A1F9E4-0A9A-4B5F-98D2-585306EB99AA@bitsofproof.com>
<CANEZrP1rK3z5LXd+q-SRd3pzP5QLoJSL=CMPviH4fFVGKWT69g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de; tamas@bitsofproof.com; 1371717557;
08621cee;
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
X-Headers-End: 1UpaOj-0006D1-Ek
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Missing fRelayTxes in version
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 08:39:19 -0000
--Apple-Mail=_4A2B3B2A-66B7-49FC-947F-47A201BD0F89
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=iso-8859-1
Yes it is trivial. I do not think greater complexity in the system =
should keep us from addressing low complexity issues.
You can't blame me or others not trying to simplify scripts, if there is =
such a headwind simplifying a version message.
You are right there is too much fuss about this.
Tam=E1s Blummer
Founder, CEO
http://bitsofproof.com
On 20.06.2013, at 10:31, Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net> wrote:
> You can't eliminate the complexity (yet), otherwise you wouldn't be =
able to talk to old nodes. You'll have to wait until versions prior to a =
particular version are hard-forked off and can be safely dropped at =
connect time.
>=20
> That said the reason I'm being so grumpy about this is that compared =
to the complexity in the rest of the system, this is such a trivial and =
minor detail. It's hardly even worth thinking about. I mean, we have a =
scripting language full of opcodes nobody ever figured out how to use =
and the protocol uses a mixture of byte orders, so an optional field in =
the version message is really not such a big deal :)
>=20
>=20
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Tamas Blummer =
<tamas@bitsofproof.com> wrote:
> I agree that this can be deferred until there is an actual new field =
without any harm. But then remember to update the BIP37 too saying that =
it is optional only if flag added in BIPXX is not present.
>=20
> Your argument is that this complexity is already there so why not =
preserve it. I think eliminating complexity (that has no benefit) =
strengthens the system.
>=20
> Tam=E1s Blummer
> http://bitsofproof.com
>=20
> On 20.06.2013, at 09:36, Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net> wrote:
>=20
>> Sure but why not do that when there's an actual new field to add? =
Does anyone have a proposal for a feature that needs a new version field =
at the moment? There's no point changing the protocol now unless there's =
actually a new field to add.
>>=20
>> Anyway I still don't see why anyone cares about this issue. The =
Bitcoin protocol does not and never has required that all messages have =
a fixed number of fields per version. Any parser written on the =
assumption it did was just buggy. Look at how tx messages are relayed =
for the most obvious example of that pattern in action - it's actually =
the raw byte stream that's stored and relayed to ensure that fields =
added in new versions aren't dropped during round-tripping. Old versions =
are supposed to preserve fields from the future.
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Tamas Blummer =
<tamas@bitsofproof.com> wrote:
>> Hi Mike,
>>=20
>> The issue with the current parser is that those fields are =
conditionally optional on that there will be no subsequent fields added.
>> If there will be further fields they will become manadory.=20
>> =20
>> Why not bump the version and parse the fields as mandatory from then =
on? This would be backward compatible and cleaner
>> going forward.
>>=20
>> Tamas Blummer
>> http://bitsofproof.com
>>=20
>>=20
>> =
--------------------------------------------------------------------------=
----
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
>>=20
>> Build for Windows Store.
>>=20
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bitcoin-development mailing list
>> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>>=20
>>=20
>=20
>=20
--Apple-Mail=_4A2B3B2A-66B7-49FC-947F-47A201BD0F89
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html;
charset=iso-8859-1
<html><head><meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html =
charset=3Diso-8859-1"></head><body style=3D"word-wrap: break-word; =
-webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div =
apple-content-edited=3D"true"><div style=3D"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); =
font-family: Helvetica; font-size: medium; font-style: normal; =
font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; =
line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: =
0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: =
0px; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; =
"><div style=3D"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: =
medium; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; =
letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: =
0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: =
0px; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; =
text-align: left; ">Yes it is trivial. I do not think greater complexity =
in the system should keep us from addressing low complexity =
issues.</div><div style=3D"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; =
font-size: medium; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; =
font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; =
orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; =
widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; =
-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-align: left; ">You can't blame me =
or others not trying to simplify scripts, if there is such a headwind =
simplifying a version message.</div><div style=3D"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); =
font-family: Helvetica; font-size: medium; font-style: normal; =
font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; =
line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; =
white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; =
-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; =
text-align: left; ">You are right there is too much fuss about =
this.</div><div style=3D"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; =
font-size: medium; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; =
font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; =
orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; =
widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; =
-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-align: left; "><br></div><div =
style=3D"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: medium; =
font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; =
letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: =
-webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: =
normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; =
-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; "><b>Tam=E1s Blummer</b></div><div =
style=3D"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: medium; =
font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; =
letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: =
-webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: =
normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; =
-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; ">Founder, CEO</div><span style=3D"color: =
rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: medium; font-style: =
normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: =
normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; =
text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; =
word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; =
-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; "><a href=3D"http://bitsofproof.com/" =
style=3D"font-family: Helvetica; font-size: medium; font-style: normal; =
font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; =
line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: =
0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: =
0px; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; =
"><span><span style=3D"font-family: Helvetica; font-size: medium; =
font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; =
letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: =
-webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: =
normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; =
-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); display: inline =
!important; float: none; ">http://bitsofproof.com</span>
</span></a></span></div><a href=3D"http://bitsofproof.com/" =
style=3D"font-family: Helvetica; font-size: medium; font-style: normal; =
font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; =
line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: =
0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: =
0px; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; ">
</a></div><br><div><div>On 20.06.2013, at 10:31, Mike Hearn <<a =
href=3D"mailto:mike@plan99.net">mike@plan99.net</a>> wrote:</div><br =
class=3D"Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type=3D"cite"><div =
dir=3D"ltr">You can't eliminate the complexity (yet), otherwise you =
wouldn't be able to talk to old nodes. You'll have to wait until =
versions prior to a particular version are hard-forked off and can be =
safely dropped at connect time.<div>
<br></div><div>That said the reason I'm being so grumpy about this is =
that compared to the complexity in the rest of the system, this is such =
a trivial and minor detail. It's hardly even worth thinking about. I =
mean, we have a scripting language full of opcodes nobody ever figured =
out how to use and the protocol uses a mixture of byte orders, so an =
optional field in the version message is really not such a big deal =
:)</div>
</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On =
Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Tamas Blummer <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a =
href=3D"mailto:tamas@bitsofproof.com" =
target=3D"_blank">tamas@bitsofproof.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 =
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div =
style=3D"word-wrap:break-word"><div><div =
style=3D"text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;font-variant:normal;text-al=
ign:-webkit-auto;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;line-height:normal;t=
ext-transform:none;font-size:medium;white-space:normal;font-family:Helveti=
ca;word-spacing:0px">
<div =
style=3D"text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;font-variant:normal;text-al=
ign:left;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;line-height:normal;text-tran=
sform:none;font-size:medium;white-space:normal;font-family:Helvetica;word-=
spacing:0px">
I agree that this can be deferred until there is an actual new field =
without any harm. But then remember to update the BIP37 too saying that =
it is optional only if flag added in BIPXX is not present.</div><div =
style=3D"text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;font-variant:normal;text-al=
ign:left;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;line-height:normal;text-tran=
sform:none;font-size:medium;white-space:normal;font-family:Helvetica;word-=
spacing:0px">
<br></div><div =
style=3D"text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;font-variant:normal;text-al=
ign:left;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;line-height:normal;text-tran=
sform:none;font-size:medium;white-space:normal;font-family:Helvetica;word-=
spacing:0px">
Your argument is that this complexity is already there so why not =
preserve it. I think eliminating complexity (that has no benefit) =
strengthens the system.</div><div =
style=3D"text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;font-variant:normal;text-al=
ign:left;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;line-height:normal;text-tran=
sform:none;font-size:medium;white-space:normal;font-family:Helvetica;word-=
spacing:0px">
<br></div><div =
style=3D"text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;font-variant:normal;text-al=
ign:-webkit-auto;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;line-height:normal;t=
ext-transform:none;font-size:medium;white-space:normal;font-family:Helveti=
ca;word-spacing:0px">
<b>Tam=E1s Blummer</b></div><div =
style=3D"text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;font-variant:normal;text-al=
ign:-webkit-auto;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;line-height:normal;t=
ext-transform:none;font-size:medium;white-space:normal;font-family:Helveti=
ca;word-spacing:0px">
<a href=3D"http://bitsofproof.com/" =
target=3D"_blank"><span>http://bitsofproof.com</span></a></div></div><a =
href=3D"http://bitsofproof.com/" =
style=3D"font-family:Helvetica;font-size:medium;font-style:normal;font-var=
iant:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;line-height:normal;te=
xt-align:-webkit-auto;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:norm=
al;word-spacing:0px" target=3D"_blank">
</a></div><div><div class=3D"h5"><br><div><div>On 20.06.2013, at 09:36, =
Mike Hearn <<a href=3D"mailto:mike@plan99.net" =
target=3D"_blank">mike@plan99.net</a>> wrote:</div><br><blockquote =
type=3D"cite"><div dir=3D"ltr">Sure but why not do that when there's an =
actual new field to add? Does anyone have a proposal for a feature that =
needs a new version field at the moment? There's no point changing the =
protocol now unless there's actually a new field to add.<div>
<br></div><div>Anyway I still don't see why anyone cares about this =
issue. The Bitcoin protocol does not and never has required that all =
messages have a fixed number of fields per version. Any parser written =
on the assumption it did was just buggy. Look at how tx messages are =
relayed for the most obvious example of that pattern in action - it's =
actually the raw byte stream that's stored and relayed to ensure that =
fields added in new versions aren't dropped during round-tripping. Old =
versions are supposed to preserve fields from the future.</div>
<div><br></div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><br><div =
class=3D"gmail_quote">On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Tamas Blummer =
<span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:tamas@bitsofproof.com" =
target=3D"_blank">tamas@bitsofproof.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 =
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div =
style=3D"word-wrap:break-word"><div><div =
style=3D"text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;font-variant:normal;text-al=
ign:-webkit-auto;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;line-height:normal;t=
ext-transform:none;font-size:medium;white-space:normal;font-family:Helveti=
ca;word-spacing:0px">
<div =
style=3D"text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;font-variant:normal;text-al=
ign:left;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;line-height:normal;text-tran=
sform:none;font-size:medium;white-space:normal;font-family:Helvetica;word-=
spacing:0px">
Hi Mike,</div><div =
style=3D"text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;font-variant:normal;text-al=
ign:left;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;line-height:normal;text-tran=
sform:none;font-size:medium;white-space:normal;font-family:Helvetica;word-=
spacing:0px">
<br></div><div =
style=3D"text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;font-variant:normal;text-al=
ign:left;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;line-height:normal;text-tran=
sform:none;font-size:medium;white-space:normal;font-family:Helvetica;word-=
spacing:0px">
The issue with the current parser is that those fields are conditionally =
optional on that there will be no subsequent fields added.</div><div =
style=3D"text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;font-variant:normal;text-al=
ign:left;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;line-height:normal;text-tran=
sform:none;font-size:medium;white-space:normal;font-family:Helvetica;word-=
spacing:0px">
If there will be further fields they will become =
manadory. </div><div =
style=3D"text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;font-variant:normal;text-al=
ign:left;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;line-height:normal;text-tran=
sform:none;font-size:medium;white-space:normal;font-family:Helvetica;word-=
spacing:0px">
</div><div =
style=3D"text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;font-variant:normal;text-al=
ign:left;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;line-height:normal;text-tran=
sform:none;font-size:medium;white-space:normal;font-family:Helvetica;word-=
spacing:0px">
Why not bump the version and parse the fields as mandatory from =
then on? This would be backward compatible and cleaner</div><div =
style=3D"text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;font-variant:normal;text-al=
ign:left;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;line-height:normal;text-tran=
sform:none;font-size:medium;white-space:normal;font-family:Helvetica;word-=
spacing:0px">
going forward.</div><span><font color=3D"#888888"><div =
style=3D"text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;font-variant:normal;text-al=
ign:left;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;line-height:normal;text-tran=
sform:none;font-size:medium;white-space:normal;font-family:Helvetica;word-=
spacing:0px">
<br></div><div =
style=3D"text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;font-variant:normal;text-al=
ign:-webkit-auto;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;line-height:normal;t=
ext-transform:none;font-size:medium;white-space:normal;font-family:Helveti=
ca;word-spacing:0px">
<span>Tamas Blummer</span></div><div =
style=3D"text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;font-variant:normal;text-al=
ign:-webkit-auto;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;line-height:normal;t=
ext-transform:none;font-size:medium;white-space:normal;font-family:Helveti=
ca;word-spacing:0px">
<span><span><a href=3D"http://bitsofproof.com/" =
target=3D"_blank">http://bitsofproof.com</a></span></span></div></font></s=
pan></div><a href=3D"http://bitsofproof.com/" =
style=3D"font-family:Helvetica;font-size:medium;font-style:normal;font-var=
iant:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;line-height:normal;te=
xt-align:-webkit-auto;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:norm=
al;word-spacing:0px" target=3D"_blank">
=
</a></div><br></div><br>--------------------------------------------------=
----------------------------<br>
This <a href=3D"http://sf.net/" target=3D"_blank">SF.net</a> email is =
sponsored by Windows:<br>
<br>
Build for Windows Store.<br>
<br>
<a href=3D"http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev" =
target=3D"_blank">http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev</a><br>_____________=
__________________________________<br>
Bitcoin-development mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net" =
target=3D"_blank">Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br>
<a =
href=3D"https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development" =
target=3D"_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-dev=
elopment</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
</blockquote></div><br></body></html>=
--Apple-Mail=_4A2B3B2A-66B7-49FC-947F-47A201BD0F89--
|