1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
|
Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 694AC25A
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 18 Jul 2015 15:09:46 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from outmail148107.authsmtp.com (outmail148107.authsmtp.com
[62.13.148.107])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0FBF112
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 18 Jul 2015 15:09:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-c237.authsmtp.com (mail-c237.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.237])
by punt18.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t6IF9iEo059477;
Sat, 18 Jul 2015 16:09:44 +0100 (BST)
Received: from savin.petertodd.org (75-119-251-161.dsl.teksavvy.com
[75.119.251.161]) (authenticated bits=128)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t6IF9esa004203
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
Sat, 18 Jul 2015 16:09:43 +0100 (BST)
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 11:09:40 -0400
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Mike Hearn <hearn@vinumeris.com>
Message-ID: <20150718150939.GA5065@savin.petertodd.org>
References: <24662b038abc45da7f3990e12a649b8a@airmail.cc>
<55A7BFF7.2050608@xylon.de>
<CA+w+GKTmBpLYDx+yfW=D4pa40n7qKC8knHMS413MoSfq3Wrafg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CA+w+GKTmBpLYDx+yfW=D4pa40n7qKC8knHMS413MoSfq3Wrafg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Server-Quench: 051fd786-2d5f-11e5-9f75-002590a135d3
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
aQdMdwoUEkAYAgsB AmMbWlJeUFR7XWA7 bA9PbARUfEhLXhtr
VklWR1pVCwQmRRp4 cBdLEUhydwFEeH0+ bE5rWD5bWUUsIUF1
RFNWQWhQeGZhPWUC WRZfch5UcAFPdx8U a1N6AHBDAzANdhEy
HhM4ODE3eDlSNhEd eQACK1McQE0CGCJ0 QxcZBjg0VUcUDyk0
MhYiJxsHBEsXPkQ0 PhM8X1kfNRETEAhT EyMFHDVQIUIITDYq CgVBNQAA
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1024:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 75.119.251.161/587
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Significant losses by double-spending unconfirmed
transactions
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 15:09:46 -0000
--SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 01:43:14PM +0200, Mike Hearn via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> >
> > What are these pre- and post-Hearn-relay drop rules you are speaking
> > about?
>=20
>=20
> He's talking about patches I didn't even write (Gavin and Tom did), but
> have included in Bitcoin XT:
No, he's talking about the min-relay-fee drop that you wrote:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/3305
Based on what I saw in my logs, the double-spends were mainly being done
by exploiting the fact that much of the hashing power has reverted your
10x relay fee drop as it makes wasting bandwidth and mempool RAM easy.
(so much so that crashing nodes with OOM's is fairly cheap)
--=20
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
00000000000000000a56b9b96af356cc8411cea940bb6c25b9cd934f99f9e174
--SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQGrBAEBCACVBQJVqmwvXhSAAAAAABUAQGJsb2NraGFzaEBiaXRjb2luLm9yZzAw
MDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwYTU2YjliOTZhZjM1NmNjODQxMWNlYTk0MGJiNmMyNWI5
Y2Q5MzRmOTlmOWUxNzQvFIAAAAAAFQARcGthLWFkZHJlc3NAZ251cGcub3JncGV0
ZUBwZXRlcnRvZC5vcmcACgkQJIFAPaXwkftz/Af/VheWGITiJCH2eM5P1muTIKaC
WLgRBAmJyU6ULJj1EVzdtZqjMv55kEHM73DsxOPtPuieorhNwTJzpIEOePADy6TV
XnRdau0+ogM5IpMvGoPslnqeNZGDRz1CcNMdCwyYl7r2URfU6w5ATMpCPLzlhThU
Ch3wOAt1QVihO7L8bIzz102m0LnANWusvpTWfAxl3l0GmAue9WhXG+7BylqXNMcH
1TGcesmBV4otnBoLv0jM4PLVwpRMOu3Kazf/+69bPUnDJd2rTGthtPQ2b95f3gwF
wkXIiyIyRCDbRFReV0/ZpyuVrUFlhSEff0vVtXImqjCM72kb+NbXMVjpwHp82g==
=dVni
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s--
|
