1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
|
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <pete@petertodd.org>) id 1VZMJS-0007qI-Ib
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 24 Oct 2013 14:55:02 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of petertodd.org
designates 62.13.148.95 as permitted sender)
client-ip=62.13.148.95; envelope-from=pete@petertodd.org;
helo=outmail148095.authsmtp.com;
Received: from outmail148095.authsmtp.com ([62.13.148.95])
by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
id 1VZMJR-0006ZD-26 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 24 Oct 2013 14:55:02 +0000
Received: from mail-c237.authsmtp.com (mail-c237.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.237])
by punt8.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id r9OEssBi013016;
Thu, 24 Oct 2013 15:54:54 +0100 (BST)
Received: from savin (76-10-178-109.dsl.teksavvy.com [76.10.178.109])
(authenticated bits=128)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id r9OEsmhe078618
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
Thu, 24 Oct 2013 15:54:50 +0100 (BST)
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 10:54:47 -0400
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
Message-ID: <20131024145447.GA19949@savin>
References: <20131024143043.GA12658@savin>
<CANEZrP100Lg_1LcFMKx1yWrGTSFb5GZmLmXNbZjPGaiEgOeuwA@mail.gmail.com>
<20131024144358.GA17142@savin>
<CANEZrP1TfM+wYbGjUk3+8JJZs6cKZXdb57xGMc=hDr9dQjMMZA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="AhhlLboLdkugWU4S"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CANEZrP1TfM+wYbGjUk3+8JJZs6cKZXdb57xGMc=hDr9dQjMMZA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Server-Quench: 3c1c315b-3cbc-11e3-94fa-002590a135d3
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
aAdMdAYUF1YAAgsB AmUbWlFeVVl7XGI7 bAxPbAVDY01GQQRq
WVdMSlVNFUsqCGN0 RUNGBxl1fwNHcDB5 ZE9qEHMIXRd5dEMv
X00HRz4bZGY1a30W VBYJagNUcgZDfk5E aVUrVz1vNG8XDQg5
AwQ0PjZ0MThBJSBS WgQAK04nCWMCHT86 SFgMEDhnEFYZRiA6
Mx0hLBYWEVoNP19a
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1024:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 76.10.178.109/587
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
for more information. [URIs: petertodd.org]
X-Headers-End: 1VZMJR-0006ZD-26
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Making fee estimation better
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 14:55:02 -0000
--AhhlLboLdkugWU4S
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 04:46:41PM +0200, Mike Hearn wrote:
> Well, miners are all supposed to be more or less equivalent - modulo
> differences in tx acceptance policies - so I'd hope that having out of bad
> fee mechanisms yet still broadcasting the TX isn't that common. If it was
> broadcasted, it should get mined in short order, otherwise things are goi=
ng
> wrong.
Eligius has contracts to do transaction mining, and it's currently 10%
of the hashing power.
As I said elsewhere, a good use-case for OOB fee payment is for
merchants who use the payment protocol, and want to get their customers
transactions mined as efficiently and cheaply as possible.
(child-pays-for-parent has more blockchain bloat and thus extra expense)
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> wrote:
>=20
> > Anyway, in what circumstance would a customer want an exclusive contract
> > with a miner?
> >
>=20
> I was thinking for transactions that aren't standard so have to be
> submitted to miners directly.
Sure, but even then there's no harm in letting more than one miner know
about it.
There's even an existing form of this: P2Pool lets shares be accompanied
by up to 50KB worth of transactions of any form.
--=20
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
000000000000000d2860c825ea223b805c60a33b26b9b70616698033d360b066
--AhhlLboLdkugWU4S
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)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==
=u0G9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--AhhlLboLdkugWU4S--
|
