1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
|
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <jan.moller@gmail.com>) id 1WcWOm-00084U-Al
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:49:52 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.216.53 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.216.53; envelope-from=jan.moller@gmail.com;
helo=mail-qa0-f53.google.com;
Received: from mail-qa0-f53.google.com ([209.85.216.53])
by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1WcWOg-0003lQ-Jf
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:49:52 +0000
Received: by mail-qa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id w8so4671083qac.26
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Tue, 22 Apr 2014 01:49:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.16.198 with SMTP id 64mr50017679qgb.10.1398156581183;
Tue, 22 Apr 2014 01:49:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.140.24.201 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 01:49:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgQJ2EULensrGfB-Rj95+MyxtkQFUHaKs_bJOOBBTqPE_Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAC7yFxSE8-TWPN-kuFiqdPKMDuprbiVJi7-z-ym+AUyA_f-xJw@mail.gmail.com>
<6669921.kYEqrMqt0u@crushinator>
<CAAS2fgSfiYwD-M7+k65JF0Kjeod1zEiPcxPN1iDBHLzYV7UQyA@mail.gmail.com>
<16848732.PiyLLsBBZa@crushinator>
<CAC7yFxR7XWtFSMeHgbMZOMKbr+kK_7Ezb7zBUQP08rfC0am9sQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CABh=4qNaJht-MnnjEguZ=UOuXN3uQ-s4-dkDUVErbHj6W44J_g@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAS2fgQJ2EULensrGfB-Rj95+MyxtkQFUHaKs_bJOOBBTqPE_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 10:49:41 +0200
Message-ID: <CABh=4qPMtnZsPfanJgi63vo6Bt4TTQLx7EqJh268+NUxb4gC7A@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jan_M=C3=B8ller?= <jan.moller@gmail.com>
To: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c0ff125ca7b904f79db2d9
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(jan.moller[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1WcWOg-0003lQ-Jf
Cc: bitcoin-development <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Presenting a BIP for Shamir's Secret
Sharing of Bitcoin private keys
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jan.moller@gmail.com
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:49:52 -0000
--001a11c0ff125ca7b904f79db2d9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I did comment on it back in october (
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3D258678.msg3298089#msg3298089) :-)
But I must admit that I haven't been tracking it since then.
I have never been a proponent of BIP 38 (which this BIP is derived from)
and generally think that encrypting a secret with a human generated
password is silly for many reasons (Let me know if I should repeat my list
of concerns). As far as I remember we are pretty much on the same page here=
.
Using SSS is superior in every way that I can think of.
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>wrote=
:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 1:06 AM, Jan M=C3=B8ller <jan.moller@gmail.com> w=
rote:
> > This is a very useful BIP, and I am very much looking forward to
> > implementing it in Mycelium, in particular for bip32 wallets.
>
> I haven't seen commentary from you on the Kogelman draft, it would be
> helpful there: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3D258678.0
>
--001a11c0ff125ca7b904f79db2d9
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">I did comment on it back in october (<a href=3D"https://bi=
tcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3D258678.msg3298089#msg3298089">https://bitco=
intalk.org/index.php?topic=3D258678.msg3298089#msg3298089</a>) :-)<div>But =
I must admit that I haven't been tracking it since then.</div>
<div><br></div><div>I have never been a proponent of BIP 38 (which this BIP=
is derived from) and generally think that encrypting a secret with a human=
generated password is silly for many reasons (Let me know if I should repe=
at my list of concerns). As far as I remember we are pretty much on the sam=
e page here.</div>
<div>Using SSS is superior in every way that I can think of.</div></div><di=
v class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Apr 22, =
2014 at 10:15 AM, Gregory Maxwell <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:g=
maxwell@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">gmaxwell@gmail.com</a>></span> wrot=
e:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class=3D"">On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 1:06=
AM, Jan M=C3=B8ller <<a href=3D"mailto:jan.moller@gmail.com">jan.moller=
@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> This is a very useful BIP, and I am very much looking forward to<br>
> implementing it in Mycelium, in particular for bip32 wallets.<br>
<br>
</div>I haven't seen commentary from you on the Kogelman draft, it woul=
d be<br>
helpful there: <a href=3D"https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3D258678.=
0" target=3D"_blank">https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3D258678.0</a>=
<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>
--001a11c0ff125ca7b904f79db2d9--
|
