summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/03/0b367e75dd79b3837ebaca34181a560c2a580c
blob: 9fabf445c2fea78d5918a3b5b55ab03f1f63107f (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
Return-Path: <elombrozo@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 082B925A
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 31 Jul 2015 00:22:16 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pa0-f48.google.com (mail-pa0-f48.google.com
	[209.85.220.48])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A35F819F
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 31 Jul 2015 00:22:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pachj5 with SMTP id hj5so30960151pac.3
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 30 Jul 2015 17:22:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
	:message-id:references:to;
	bh=XhZgCulg28Hl5XJ+dv611woAVLcAM8kZl7Lo8TQURy0=;
	b=jdrmZHjq3BTDbK97CSxAaydnY5VjoPJfhYLiVMwGV9UksLVaUlxESob1WFqpKdJbXs
	Y+on7gS/58uw7ruFZZpHMVqXQgk2Pr3OofnwzB089x6iM2KdIMlK+rqOuBy71lBVFPKx
	xcoXKC/LzaqHFTtO8KLcz608crCLRUDhIxwzdZ3abcA//pnVG4JKgZz98TRE2vkAZdgk
	Zwd8amqvIekfRelM443aLv8ETQiFMgdTC4ppSrhLWa/T0BPEbVf/VDx0RXGdN4ocd6FO
	VASyycOAjXfgnx6mBFAmpCDdmkZGWrieAvkM51mKEU93/6JLG377ktxBcDekmw6fw4g4
	Lm2A==
X-Received: by 10.66.138.16 with SMTP id qm16mr114890475pab.29.1438302135330; 
	Thu, 30 Jul 2015 17:22:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.107] (cpe-76-167-237-202.san.res.rr.com.
	[76.167.237.202]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
	qn7sm4197084pab.14.2015.07.30.17.22.13
	(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Thu, 30 Jul 2015 17:22:14 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
	boundary="Apple-Mail=_1A4810F9-1518-40AA-BF00-BD893B53C1EB";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5
From: Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOG=w-vZ+5fBxpZ2bVgg_H9VD4cmSDhtkaOu4_UH3gvw-QfkEw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 17:22:11 -0700
Message-Id: <61A9E7F8-17F7-42AE-89E3-3E37BC77C3A1@gmail.com>
References: <1B7F00D3-41AE-44BF-818D-EC4EF279DC11@gmail.com>
	<CABaSBaxyQja9bqDsyfWubR1R-Xf2tqmSmU-GW_z7VQTxbBagrQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<1689926.ZjkxyJjokn@coldstorage> <4330019.CpFTjXpmfm@coldstorage>
	<CAOG=w-vZ+5fBxpZ2bVgg_H9VD4cmSDhtkaOu4_UH3gvw-QfkEw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Friedenbach <mark@friedenbach.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Why Satoshi's temporary anti-spam measure isn't
	temporary
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 00:22:16 -0000


--Apple-Mail=_1A4810F9-1518-40AA-BF00-BD893B53C1EB
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="Apple-Mail=_9AF28964-1EFA-4DB9-A67B-57AC089CEE86"


--Apple-Mail=_9AF28964-1EFA-4DB9-A67B-57AC089CEE86
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8


> On Jul 30, 2015, at 11:02 AM, Mark Friedenbach via bitcoin-dev =
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>=20
> It is possible for a decentralized system like bitcoin to scale via =
distribution in a way that introduces minimal trust, for example by =
probabilistic validation and distribution of fraud proofs. However =
changes to bitcoin consensus rules (mostly soft-forks) are required in =
order to make this possible.

Please, Mark, let=E2=80=99s make this happen.

You can count on my full support.

--Apple-Mail=_9AF28964-1EFA-4DB9-A67B-57AC089CEE86
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset=utf-8

<html><head><meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html =
charset=3Dutf-8"></head><body style=3D"word-wrap: break-word; =
-webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" =
class=3D""><br class=3D""><div><blockquote type=3D"cite" class=3D""><div =
class=3D"">On Jul 30, 2015, at 11:02 AM, Mark Friedenbach via =
bitcoin-dev &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" =
class=3D"">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>&gt; wrote:</div><br =
class=3D"Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=3D""><span =
style=3D"font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; =
font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; =
line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; =
text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: =
0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; float: none; display: inline =
!important;" class=3D"">It is possible for a decentralized system like =
bitcoin to scale via distribution in a way that introduces minimal =
trust, for example by probabilistic validation and distribution of fraud =
proofs. However changes to bitcoin consensus rules (mostly soft-forks) =
are required in order to make this =
possible.</span></div></blockquote></div><br class=3D""><div =
class=3D"">Please, Mark, let=E2=80=99s make this happen.</div><div =
class=3D""><br class=3D""></div><div class=3D"">You can count on my full =
support.</div></body></html>=

--Apple-Mail=_9AF28964-1EFA-4DB9-A67B-57AC089CEE86--

--Apple-Mail=_1A4810F9-1518-40AA-BF00-BD893B53C1EB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
	name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
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=exck
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail=_1A4810F9-1518-40AA-BF00-BD893B53C1EB--