1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
|
Return-Path: <achow101@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B046189C
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 5 Feb 2017 21:50:22 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-qk0-f178.google.com (mail-qk0-f178.google.com
[209.85.220.178])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF7C818F
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 5 Feb 2017 21:50:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qk0-f178.google.com with SMTP id u25so38941227qki.2
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 05 Feb 2017 13:50:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=o7wc2aA4fBovYwUdx7/ZtxJYN0dMhkYYe5zP4zEZbfU=;
b=k4AkYYDa6hpLpTEDW0IqTb9/csIcq6AGWmtYgueeyAwFGYhZd5ZDvg+kuoxm0msM9f
YE6zkMynSAuUpHkhPntRcSfgEUUPqQ+PrRHR4cNLIRi+QW3yNMHMD0zudFQBqcVQCIzd
ib6DoznGmSIbMgClUfGV5IrSadDMjQp+CpdFhQwSmVHIqSNeSElmDq11z2wE8uu28cgV
gBsudXUjqT0CFX8mM7x8aUCdpjMtxWZJHaDDqeiIMcs/tnHunQnM8zEo4PG3GrfFaCNF
IAB4v9vH9zysK2gPzUhsAunuSe4ioq/b9M78zdzwK7TiJMpFooPXLN637UTJQDTPOsFi
VomQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent
:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=o7wc2aA4fBovYwUdx7/ZtxJYN0dMhkYYe5zP4zEZbfU=;
b=F9URN7TVOEuMl/9QhKm7KPzW5IKd4HYOepbgsm81O0XP3gkeEhx0bq3JA1tMe9DL71
MUIsRAtiMmz0zjTFOjKvJ44U+T73J7MJQLypja1UkAYm5+cOraazI7xzvjoshvRTZHme
F7tSIRn2+Yi+oEuilN7OrlPur9asmQW9spMK3urKLsN+9IM5EthTw2U58RcxTqWDSwz0
NVO5W0rmkfKlWs/daj87p37BThdtr5Lo8wtRSyyHwV5ibDfuOUUI9dU6OKVan629nLX+
h391KsczNP1DDntus/zO8dddDymuMEc/pGeOggiK618Ec6xPk1mGNi4Y8hUuZ6j37qHb
WMeA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nBNS9ILZUQhfFaPgWFjKlvBTVKTegauiHL54EbDpmS34plHr00jD5SDrHGmE8img==
X-Received: by 10.55.128.65 with SMTP id b62mr7448213qkd.302.1486331420936;
Sun, 05 Feb 2017 13:50:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.6] ([129.2.206.150])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
r57sm31269107qtr.27.2017.02.05.13.50.19
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
(version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Sun, 05 Feb 2017 13:50:19 -0800 (PST)
To: bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
From: Andrew C <achow101@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <ea63ed5a-4280-c063-4984-5bc8a4b2aafa@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2017 16:50:26 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/45.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] A Modified Version of Luke-jr's Block Size BIP
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2017 21:50:22 -0000
Hello all,
Many people have expressed discontent with Luke-jr's proposed block size
BIP, in particular with the decrease in size that would occur if it were
to be activated prior to 2024.
I have decided to modify the proposal to instead begin the increase
steps at the current 1000000 byte limit. The increases and the time spam
of each increase will remain the same, just that the increase begins
from 1000000 bytes instead of 300000 bytes.
Furthermore, instead of a fixed schedule from a fixed point in time, the
increases will instead be calculated off of the MTP of the activation
block (the first block to be in the active state for this fork).
While this proposal shares many of the same issues with the one it
modifies, I hope that it will be slightly less controversial and can
allow us to move forward with scaling Bitcoin.
The full text of the proposal can be found at
https://github.com/achow101/bips/blob/bip-blksize/bip-blksize.mediawiki.
My implementation of it is available at
https://github.com/achow101/bitcoin/tree/bip-blksize
Andrew
|
