Age | Commit message (Expand) | Author | Files | Lines |
2024-03-28 | Re: [bitcoindev] Re: A Free-Relay Attack Exploiting RBF Rule #6 | Peter Todd | 1 | -0/+229 |
2023-08-21 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Concern about "Inscriptions" | Russell O'Connor | 1 | -0/+310 |
2023-04-10 | [bitcoin-dev] RGB protocol announcement | Dr Maxim Orlovsky | 1 | -0/+394 |
2023-02-02 | [bitcoin-dev] Costless bribes against time-sensitive protocols | Gleb Naumenko | 1 | -0/+451 |
2023-01-07 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Roles and procedures around adding a bitcoin core maintainer | alicexbt | 1 | -0/+277 |
2022-10-11 | [bitcoin-dev] Minor DoS vulnerability in BIP144 lack of tx witness data size ... | Loki Verloren | 1 | -0/+172 |
2022-10-07 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] On a new community process to specify covenants | Antoine Riard | 1 | -0/+598 |
2022-09-23 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] New transaction policies (nVersion=3) for contracting proto... | Greg Sanders | 1 | -0/+651 |
2022-07-15 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Security problems with relying on transaction fees for secu... | vjudeu | 1 | -0/+306 |
2022-06-28 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin covenants are inevitable | Alex Lee | 1 | -0/+373 |
2022-06-16 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Playing with full-rbf peers for fun and L2s security | alicexbt | 1 | -0/+398 |
2022-05-01 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] What to do when contentious soft fork activations are attem... | alicexbt | 1 | -0/+276 |
2022-04-21 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] 7 Theses on a next step for BIP-119 | Zac Greenwood | 1 | -0/+150 |
2021-11-15 | [bitcoin-dev] Taproot activates - A time/block line | Michael Folkson | 1 | -0/+321 |
2021-09-22 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] TAPLEAF_UPDATE_VERIFY covenant opcode | Antoine Riard | 1 | -0/+296 |
2021-09-12 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] TAPLEAF_UPDATE_VERIFY covenant opcode | Antoine Riard | 1 | -0/+713 |
2021-08-02 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Exploring: limiting transaction output amount as a function... | Zac Greenwood | 1 | -0/+499 |
2021-07-06 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proof of reserves - recording | eric | 1 | -0/+254 |
2021-06-30 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Trinary Version Signaling for softfork upgrades | eric | 1 | -0/+438 |
2021-02-18 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Yesterday's Taproot activation meeting on lockinontimeout (... | ZmnSCPxj | 1 | -0/+327 |
2020-11-30 | [bitcoin-dev] Out-of-band transaction fees | Sebastian Geisler | 1 | -0/+123 |
2020-04-22 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] RBF Pinning with Counterparties and Competi... | ZmnSCPxj | 1 | -0/+174 |
2019-11-08 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] CVE-2017-18350 disclosure | Aymeric Vitte | 1 | -0/+480 |
2019-10-17 | [bitcoin-dev] Co-Author for ''Redefinition of the term address" | Emil Engler | 1 | -0/+137 |
2019-07-31 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Add a moving checkpoint to the Bitcoin protocol | Alistair Mann | 1 | -0/+74 |
2019-06-29 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP174 extension proposal (Global Type: PSBT_GLOBAL_XPUB_SI... | Jonathan Underwood | 1 | -0/+152 |
2018-11-30 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] CPFP Carve-Out for Fee-Prediction Issues in Contracting App... | Russell O'Connor | 1 | -0/+153 |
2018-05-24 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] TXO bitfield size graphs | Jim Posen | 1 | -0/+260 |
2018-03-16 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] {sign|verify}message replacement | Karl Johan Alm | 1 | -0/+107 |
2018-01-22 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Transaction Merging (bip125 relaxation) | Rhavar | 1 | -0/+234 |
2017-07-15 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] A BIP proposal for conveniently referring to confirmed tran... | Велеслав | 1 | -0/+244 |
2017-02-25 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] SHA1 collisions make Git vulnerable to attakcs by third-par... | Peter Todd | 1 | -0/+153 |
2017-01-12 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Transaction Replacement by Fee | Greg Sanders | 1 | -0/+137 |
2016-12-11 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Managing block size the same way we do difficulty (aka Bloc... | Adam Back | 1 | -0/+308 |
2016-10-16 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Start time for BIP141 (segwit) | Gavin Andresen | 1 | -0/+120 |
2016-08-17 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Hardware Wallet Standard | Nicolas Bacca | 1 | -0/+122 |
2016-08-08 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Hiding entire content of on-chain transactions | Henning Kopp | 1 | -0/+238 |
2016-06-21 | [bitcoin-dev] Geographic Partitioning | Akiva Lichtner | 1 | -0/+184 |
2016-06-08 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP141 segwit consensus rule update: extension of witness p... | Luke Dashjr | 1 | -0/+69 |
2016-03-02 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Hardfork to fix difficulty drop algorithm | Eric Voskuil | 1 | -0/+202 |
2016-02-26 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] INV overhead and batched INVs to reduce full node traffic | Jonathan Toomim | 1 | -0/+99 |
2016-02-07 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP proposal: Increase block size limit to 2 megabytes | Patrick Strateman | 1 | -0/+115 |
2015-12-30 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] An implementation of BIP102 as a softfork. | Marcel Jamin | 1 | -0/+325 |
2015-11-02 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Compatibility requirements for hard or soft forks | Justus Ranvier | 1 | -0/+510 |
2015-10-09 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin network simulation testing? | Byron Gibson | 1 | -0/+196 |
2015-09-28 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Let's deploy BIP65 CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY! | s7r | 1 | -0/+108 |
2015-08-21 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Revisiting NODE_BLOOM: Proposed BIP | Peter Todd | 1 | -0/+176 |
2015-08-19 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] bitcoin-dev list etiquette | Theo Chino | 1 | -0/+284 |
2015-08-17 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin XT 0.11A | Cameron Garnham | 1 | -0/+127 |
2015-08-15 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin XT 0.11A | Bryan Bishop | 1 | -0/+100 |