diff options
| author | John Smith <witchspace81@gmail.com> | 2011-07-02 18:03:49 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2011-07-02 18:03:55 +0000 |
| commit | e59519ede21f4c25bc23295a504685fc00337230 (patch) | |
| tree | 91d2da6ff2886bb3d7cdd7748999c0cec5a97c96 | |
| parent | 37d29b006a73fc6d47b4d677c854f1180f31048a (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-e59519ede21f4c25bc23295a504685fc00337230.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-e59519ede21f4c25bc23295a504685fc00337230.zip | |
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Reconsider build system change?
| -rw-r--r-- | b2/5380888af69662fb53f501c1c2ea55a26b171d | 141 |
1 files changed, 141 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/b2/5380888af69662fb53f501c1c2ea55a26b171d b/b2/5380888af69662fb53f501c1c2ea55a26b171d new file mode 100644 index 000000000..c05423dd2 --- /dev/null +++ b/b2/5380888af69662fb53f501c1c2ea55a26b171d @@ -0,0 +1,141 @@ +Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] + helo=mx.sourceforge.net) + by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) + (envelope-from <witchspace81@gmail.com>) id 1Qd4Xr-0003Mz-HC + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Sat, 02 Jul 2011 18:03:55 +0000 +Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com + designates 209.85.213.175 as permitted sender) + client-ip=209.85.213.175; envelope-from=witchspace81@gmail.com; + helo=mail-yx0-f175.google.com; +Received: from mail-yx0-f175.google.com ([209.85.213.175]) + by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) + (Exim 4.76) id 1Qd4Xq-0003K0-OG + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Sat, 02 Jul 2011 18:03:55 +0000 +Received: by yxi19 with SMTP id 19so414124yxi.34 + for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>; + Sat, 02 Jul 2011 11:03:49 -0700 (PDT) +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Received: by 10.151.8.21 with SMTP id l21mr441237ybi.186.1309629829297; Sat, + 02 Jul 2011 11:03:49 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by 10.151.150.15 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Jul 2011 11:03:49 -0700 (PDT) +In-Reply-To: <65026C81-A96E-490A-90D2-794A10C2A680@jrbobdobbs.org> +References: <CAJNQ0stvozeQAVFkduY7Ph5EXy8ayYwiu4T+6Oz1RwjgiDnBeA@mail.gmail.com> + <201107021050.10563.luke@dashjr.org> + <CAJNQ0svyJcob=gfWfi7YuLWTdbLokrFyDGnMFtYLRk_29r-DZw@mail.gmail.com> + <1DBB0EED-7A9C-46AC-ABE2-6214ABD3FE9A@jrbobdobbs.org> + <CAJNQ0su0jtaFz6abS+H24d7dqKoWkugct1yQLeVyXTgr0rkXXA@mail.gmail.com> + <CAJNQ0stDg7qCxb8f-KjfP7k0RyM0dpHETkf==uswOzm4DstSUQ@mail.gmail.com> + <65026C81-A96E-490A-90D2-794A10C2A680@jrbobdobbs.org> +Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2011 18:03:49 +0000 +Message-ID: <CAJNQ0sv4i+wTQeGBmmfMpUL-mUB2a6KX1NddF2K4Lecs4ofuAA@mail.gmail.com> +From: John Smith <witchspace81@gmail.com> +To: Douglas Huff <dhuff@jrbobdobbs.org> +Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd514ccc337b704a719f4eb +X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) +X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. + See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. + -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for + sender-domain + 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider + (witchspace81[at]gmail.com) + -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record + 0.1 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in + digit (witchspace81[at]gmail.com) + 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message + -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from + author's domain + 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, + not necessarily valid + -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature +X-Headers-End: 1Qd4Xq-0003K0-OG +Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> +Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Reconsider build system change? +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 +Precedence: list +List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 18:03:55 -0000 + +--000e0cd514ccc337b704a719f4eb +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 + +On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Douglas Huff <dhuff@jrbobdobbs.org> wrote: + +> On Jul 2, 2011, at 12:31 PM, John Smith wrote: +> > So, what about native build script generation for other platforms? +> autotools can only generate makefiles (with at least two intermediate code +> generation steps), which is quite limited. +> +> This would be true if gmake didn't build/run basically everywhere; but, it +> does. +> + +It doesn't for the native build systems on at least Windows and OSX. Yes, +you can get gmake to run, but it's a hack. + + +> I would say that's actually a mark against cmake. If you need a gui to +> select build options because your cli doesn't have proper help output +> something is wrong. +> + +You don't need to use the UI. It's just a convenience. Command line can +simply be used if you want. + + +> If you're willing to setup and maintain a cmake build environment I +> wouldn't say it should be rejected outright. Speculating about it without an +> implementation to compare seems like a waste of time. +> + +As I said in my opening post, there *is* a cmake build system implemented +for bitcoin. + +JS + +--000e0cd514ccc337b704a719f4eb +Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Douglas Huff= + <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:dhuff@jrbobdobbs.org">dhuff@jrbobd= +obbs.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style= +=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"> +<div class=3D"im">On Jul 2, 2011, at 12:31 PM, John Smith wrote:<br> +> So, what about native build script generation for other platforms? aut= +otools can only generate makefiles (with at least two intermediate code gen= +eration steps), which is quite limited.<br> +<br> +</div>This would be true if gmake didn't build/run basically everywhere= +; but, it does.<br></blockquote><div><br>It doesn't for the native buil= +d systems on at least Windows and OSX. Yes, you can get gmake to run, but i= +t's a hack.<br> +=A0<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt= + 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">I wo= +uld say that's actually a mark against cmake. If you need a gui to sele= +ct build options because your cli doesn't have proper help output somet= +hing is wrong.<br> +</blockquote><div><br>You don't need to use the UI. It's just a con= +venience. Command line can simply be used if you want.<br>=A0<br></div><blo= +ckquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-le= +ft: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"> + +If you're willing to setup and maintain a cmake build environment I wou= +ldn't say it should be rejected outright. Speculating about it without = +an implementation to compare seems like a waste of time.<br></blockquote> +<div><br>As I said in my opening post, there *is* a cmake build system impl= +emented for bitcoin.=A0 +<br><br>JS<br></div></div> + +--000e0cd514ccc337b704a719f4eb-- + + |