diff options
| author | Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au> | 2022-10-09 23:27:42 +1000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2022-10-09 13:27:55 +0000 |
| commit | e037026f43cbc10da0272d1919b8ad8d9a62a78c (patch) | |
| tree | 798d346005240df2ce20c38e6f677370354e0df7 | |
| parent | 14ec7f83e3a222c71fdf41103502b434582114a0 (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-e037026f43cbc10da0272d1919b8ad8d9a62a78c.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-e037026f43cbc10da0272d1919b8ad8d9a62a78c.zip | |
Re: [bitcoin-dev] Packaged Transaction Relay
| -rw-r--r-- | 05/b1c3baeb1e957b709122d8c18ee5b33d2c3e8f | 92 |
1 files changed, 92 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/05/b1c3baeb1e957b709122d8c18ee5b33d2c3e8f b/05/b1c3baeb1e957b709122d8c18ee5b33d2c3e8f new file mode 100644 index 000000000..7b074b5ab --- /dev/null +++ b/05/b1c3baeb1e957b709122d8c18ee5b33d2c3e8f @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@ +Return-Path: <aj@erisian.com.au> +Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::137]) + by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AB54C002D + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Sun, 9 Oct 2022 13:27:55 +0000 (UTC) +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20C0041511 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Sun, 9 Oct 2022 13:27:55 +0000 (UTC) +DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 20C0041511 +X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -1.901 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, + UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no +Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id 8vro46Z8R5Vp + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Sun, 9 Oct 2022 13:27:54 +0000 (UTC) +X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 +DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 0069A414D1 +Received: from azure.erisian.com.au (azure.erisian.com.au [172.104.61.193]) + by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0069A414D1 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Sun, 9 Oct 2022 13:27:53 +0000 (UTC) +Received: from aj@azure.erisian.com.au (helo=sapphire.erisian.com.au) + by azure.erisian.com.au with esmtpsa (Exim 4.92 #3 (Debian)) + id 1ohWLL-00044w-9N; Sun, 09 Oct 2022 23:27:50 +1000 +Received: by sapphire.erisian.com.au (sSMTP sendmail emulation); + Sun, 09 Oct 2022 23:27:42 +1000 +Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2022 23:27:42 +1000 +From: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au> +To: eric@voskuil.org +Message-ID: <Y0LMTtOYdNjzJ1MN@erisian.com.au> +References: <03ca01d8d8fb$1558ed50$400ac7f0$@voskuil.org> + <040f01d8d93c$a58c2540$f0a46fc0$@voskuil.org> + <Yz/Hy39ablXUdmH+@erisian.com.au> + <069201d8db50$59a98c60$0cfca520$@voskuil.org> + <Y0JhqlNxUqVXQfpB@erisian.com.au> + <008301d8dbac$c28280a0$478781e0$@voskuil.org> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii +Content-Disposition: inline +In-Reply-To: <008301d8dbac$c28280a0$478781e0$@voskuil.org> +X-Spam-Score-int: -18 +X-Spam-Bar: - +Cc: 'Bitcoin Protocol Discussion' <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Packaged Transaction Relay +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2022 13:27:55 -0000 + +On Sun, Oct 09, 2022 at 12:00:04AM -0700, eric@voskuil.org wrote: +> On Sat, Oct 08, 2022, Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev wrote: +> > > > > Protocol cannot be defined on an ad-hoc basis as a "courtesy" +> > > > BIPs are a courtesy in the first place. +> > > I suppose if you felt that you were the authority then this would be +> > > your perspective. +> > You seem to think that I'm arguing courtesy is not a good thing, or that +> we +> > couldn't use more of it? +> That is neither what I said nor implied. You were clearly dismissing the +> public process, not advocating for politeness. + +And that is neither what I said nor implied, nor something I believe. If +you think courtesy is something that can be ignored in a public process, +I don't think you should expect much success. + +If you'd like to actually participate in public standards development, +please feel free to make some technical comments on my proposals, or +others, or make your own proposal, either here or on github, or heck, +anywhere else. + +I mean, that's what I'd suggest anyway; I'm not your boss. I promise to +at least be entertainingly surprised if you make any progress with your +current approach though. + +Cheers, +aj + |