diff options
| author | Tier Nolan <tier.nolan@gmail.com> | 2015-09-16 21:32:16 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2015-09-16 20:32:17 +0000 |
| commit | c326d005a10c0250f51e7947ce7ff0c8f070e048 (patch) | |
| tree | 05930ff2649c3f37ad91fe8728fb4f8ae2a60cca | |
| parent | 87d28d6fca13618f87bb9df9872ee4e958cd073e (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-c326d005a10c0250f51e7947ce7ff0c8f070e048.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-c326d005a10c0250f51e7947ce7ff0c8f070e048.zip | |
Re: [bitcoin-dev] [BIP Proposal] Version bits with timeout and delay.
| -rw-r--r-- | 07/f8d4bbeafe74cdf1c6888b5ce0b9c4eeefdfec | 95 |
1 files changed, 95 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/07/f8d4bbeafe74cdf1c6888b5ce0b9c4eeefdfec b/07/f8d4bbeafe74cdf1c6888b5ce0b9c4eeefdfec new file mode 100644 index 000000000..82f8d0033 --- /dev/null +++ b/07/f8d4bbeafe74cdf1c6888b5ce0b9c4eeefdfec @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@ +Return-Path: <tier.nolan@gmail.com> +Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org + [172.17.192.35]) + by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AD9E1396 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Wed, 16 Sep 2015 20:32:17 +0000 (UTC) +X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 +Received: from mail-vk0-f48.google.com (mail-vk0-f48.google.com + [209.85.213.48]) + by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D63B5176 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Wed, 16 Sep 2015 20:32:16 +0000 (UTC) +Received: by vkgd64 with SMTP id d64so109472418vkg.0 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Wed, 16 Sep 2015 13:32:16 -0700 (PDT) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; + h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc + :content-type; bh=+zl2h/3rb6H7muisH9VCvEZqCj7XcxG9+XxuoA+28l0=; + b=OrxkG91QPA7uOkN0JO0fc7MqewrJrqViMMGEOOJTjryly4Dz4Ea01/T3Ri+En8Mp/b + RLlqdb5AD0aPan2QVlzqmuwIKS2qoMk/DEb1yll7Vnm2e+cuEva0DiXsi0dggtyOCg/k + yZ8nZgZkQDYTpXX/AzP9I0v9gvBlkq+Lb0y3HoL43W9NlNYd+C0zpkO3t14h2VgRtNGW + PDSimKe7XzfRJy750UIgcWFlk5VzD4MQ96Onh8VnY/Cf/fUvQUHU9Rq2T/DagJbQemz+ + 98qtUP3urfYuD6JPWM/7mJ5VwiSStsuzZRCTvBzleeUvfKzxlKgV3FIerABKEo4p74qM + MFNA== +MIME-Version: 1.0 +X-Received: by 10.31.166.206 with SMTP id p197mr6863716vke.52.1442435536228; + Wed, 16 Sep 2015 13:32:16 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by 10.103.65.204 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 13:32:16 -0700 (PDT) +In-Reply-To: <CABm2gDqh=Dv2Ygctg+jEt61N_nJDRBMqdZypSPtmfM2QrY4AYQ@mail.gmail.com> +References: <87mvwqb132.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> + <CAE-z3OWLteNyBWuYSkYLZNteOGjDch_fViOV2kpWCaZkXsbu4w@mail.gmail.com> + <87r3lyjewl.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> + <CABm2gDqh=Dv2Ygctg+jEt61N_nJDRBMqdZypSPtmfM2QrY4AYQ@mail.gmail.com> +Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 21:32:16 +0100 +Message-ID: <CAE-z3OXATJ6HGKqU=vxc8k-yCMAMwXiWQJxvO3D_O256_ZODtw@mail.gmail.com> +From: Tier Nolan <tier.nolan@gmail.com> +Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1141664cbf9659051fe331cc +X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, + DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, + MALFORMED_FREEMAIL, + MISSING_HEADERS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.1 +X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on + smtp1.linux-foundation.org +Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [BIP Proposal] Version bits with timeout and + delay. +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 20:32:17 -0000 + +--001a1141664cbf9659051fe331cc +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 9:27 PM, Jorge Tim=C3=B3n <jtimon@jtimon.cc> wrote: + +> For enforcing new restrictions on your own blocks (thus at the policy +> level, not consensus) you don't need to wait for 75%. You can do it from +> the start (this way all miners setting the bit will enforce the new +> restrictions. +> +At 75%, you have a pretty solid super-majority. + +You can safely reject blocks that have the bit set but are invalid +according to the new rule (as long as everyone who sets the bit does it +too). + +--001a1141664cbf9659051fe331cc +Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +<div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quo= +te">On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 9:27 PM, Jorge Tim=C3=B3n <span dir=3D"ltr"><= +;<a href=3D"mailto:jtimon@jtimon.cc" target=3D"_blank">jtimon@jtimon.cc</a>= +></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0= + 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><p dir=3D"ltr">For enf= +orcing new restrictions on your own blocks (thus at the policy level, not c= +onsensus) you don't need to wait for 75%. You can do it from the start = +(this way all miners setting the bit will enforce the new restrictions.</p>= +</blockquote><div>At 75%, you have a pretty solid super-majority.=C2=A0 <br= +><br>You can safely reject blocks that have the bit set but are invalid acc= +ording to the new rule (as long as everyone who sets the bit does it too).<= +br></div></div></div></div> + +--001a1141664cbf9659051fe331cc-- + |