summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPeter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>2015-08-20 17:58:20 -0700
committerbitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>2015-08-21 00:58:31 +0000
commitb90800cf9df04472d52b002c616f3b8176b39683 (patch)
treeace7058309fd841b07d08b2f220e65289012da92
parent51a7c61322d006576b43b5475d562015677348a1 (diff)
downloadpi-bitcoindev-b90800cf9df04472d52b002c616f3b8176b39683.tar.gz
pi-bitcoindev-b90800cf9df04472d52b002c616f3b8176b39683.zip
Re: [bitcoin-dev] Dynamically Controlled Bitcoin Block Size Max Cap
-rw-r--r--35/ecabb14f2788cea86e5e4ca004b63a312839b5130
1 files changed, 130 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/35/ecabb14f2788cea86e5e4ca004b63a312839b5 b/35/ecabb14f2788cea86e5e4ca004b63a312839b5
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..b9296cd18
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35/ecabb14f2788cea86e5e4ca004b63a312839b5
@@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
+Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
+Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
+ [172.17.192.35])
+ by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79C0574
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Fri, 21 Aug 2015 00:58:31 +0000 (UTC)
+X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
+Received: from outmail149080.authsmtp.com (outmail149080.authsmtp.com
+ [62.13.149.80])
+ by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D86E102
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Fri, 21 Aug 2015 00:58:30 +0000 (UTC)
+Received: from mail-c235.authsmtp.com (mail-c235.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.235])
+ by punt17.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t7L0wSso088858;
+ Fri, 21 Aug 2015 01:58:28 +0100 (BST)
+Received: from muck (s75-157-242-51.bc.hsia.telus.net [75.157.242.51])
+ (authenticated bits=128)
+ by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t7L0wKeA056510
+ (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
+ Fri, 21 Aug 2015 01:58:26 +0100 (BST)
+Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 17:58:20 -0700
+From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
+To: Milly Bitcoin <milly@bitcoins.info>
+Message-ID: <20150821005820.GA27305@muck>
+References: <CAED3CWgTOMFgaM6bBfU0Dn-R0NrdrhGAQo34wHEneYkTtB4Opg@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CAEieSeSw04FYCCa-Df+V6BgJo1RHqPvJWt9t=c-JCC=dnhraWA@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CABm2gDp0o5DBzuoyZ=SFvnBXTwPYFWhdOqUPkP_M_3koNMVP1g@mail.gmail.com>
+ <55D5AA8E.7070403@bitcoins.info> <55D67017.9000106@thinlink.com>
+ <55D674C1.6000102@bitcoins.info>
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
+ protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1"
+Content-Disposition: inline
+In-Reply-To: <55D674C1.6000102@bitcoins.info>
+X-Server-Quench: bbb868a3-479f-11e5-b398-002590a15da7
+X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
+ http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
+X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
+ aAdMdAMUGUATAgsB AmMbW1VeVVV7W2Q7 bA9PbABafEhKXRtv
+ UVdMSlVNFUssBmAB QWVLIxl3cQBHeDB2 YURiECIJDkx8fRd+
+ X0pTHDsbZGY1bX1N U0lQagNUcgZDfk5E bwQuUz1vNG8XDSg5
+ AwQ0PjZ0MThBHWx5 UwcEKFMZSEIPD3YX QBYeBzIrGUAJDw8y
+ MxchK1hUNkIWOUZ6 ClozVBo9Og9aIQRG dwAA
+X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1023:706
+X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
+X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 75.157.242.51/587
+X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
+ anti-virus system.
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
+ autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
+X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
+ smtp1.linux-foundation.org
+Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
+Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Dynamically Controlled Bitcoin Block Size Max Cap
+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 00:58:31 -0000
+
+
+--n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
+Content-Disposition: inline
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
+
+On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 08:45:53PM -0400, Milly Bitcoin via bitcoin-dev wro=
+te:
+
+You know, I've noticed you've spent a tremendous amount of time and
+energy on this list promoting these kinds of metrics; obviously you're
+somewhat of an expert on this compared to the rest of us.
+
+Why don't you look into spearheading one of these analyses yourself to
+show us how it's done?
+
+> The idea is to come up with some sort of standardized metric so as
+> the tools and issues come up you are comparing similar things.
+>=20
+> The first thing you have to do is link "centralization pressure" and
+> (pressure to merge with a big miner) to some sort of overall
+> decentralization metric. For instance, how much do big miners
+> reduce decentralization to begin with? That is a complicated
+> analysis on its own. Then you can measure specif use cases with a
+> tool like that.
+>=20
+> the idea at least is that the metrics do not "take sides" on any
+> issue and just provide a measure of whatever it is you are
+> measuring.
+>=20
+> most of the references have to do with measuring decentralization in
+> political systems so a system would need to be developed to apply to
+> software projects like Bitcoin:
+>=20
+> http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/polisci/faculty/treisman/Papers/defin.pdf
+>=20
+> http://www.hks.harvard.edu/fs/pnorris/Acrobat/stm103%20articles/Schneider=
+_Decentralization.pdf
+
+--=20
+'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
+00000000000000000402fe6fb9ad613c93e12bddfc6ec02a2bd92f002050594d
+
+--n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
+Content-Description: Digital signature
+
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
+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==
+=+cuS
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
+
+--n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1--
+