diff options
| author | Warren Togami Jr. <wtogami@gmail.com> | 2014-02-28 04:42:14 -1000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2014-02-28 14:42:21 +0000 |
| commit | a56ee60cd375e56e4a0b0caf8be0379b13a10a27 (patch) | |
| tree | 86852c4c0be96fd3dca4a129ed2cdb8be0936b9d | |
| parent | 1b9b60915ac3d48e2cb84f8252c265d1128e9dff (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-a56ee60cd375e56e4a0b0caf8be0379b13a10a27.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-a56ee60cd375e56e4a0b0caf8be0379b13a10a27.zip | |
Re: [Bitcoin-development] On OP_RETURN in upcoming 0.9 release
| -rw-r--r-- | 68/da09d223ad8e214adcc8007f3940e048ed154f | 117 |
1 files changed, 117 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/68/da09d223ad8e214adcc8007f3940e048ed154f b/68/da09d223ad8e214adcc8007f3940e048ed154f new file mode 100644 index 000000000..8dc4087b1 --- /dev/null +++ b/68/da09d223ad8e214adcc8007f3940e048ed154f @@ -0,0 +1,117 @@ +Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] + helo=mx.sourceforge.net) + by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) + (envelope-from <wtogami@gmail.com>) id 1WJOdp-0005Dz-Oz + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Fri, 28 Feb 2014 14:42:21 +0000 +Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com + designates 209.85.213.46 as permitted sender) + client-ip=209.85.213.46; envelope-from=wtogami@gmail.com; + helo=mail-yh0-f46.google.com; +Received: from mail-yh0-f46.google.com ([209.85.213.46]) + by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) + (Exim 4.76) id 1WJOdn-0000kb-VV + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Fri, 28 Feb 2014 14:42:21 +0000 +Received: by mail-yh0-f46.google.com with SMTP id v1so748864yhn.19 + for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>; + Fri, 28 Feb 2014 06:42:14 -0800 (PST) +MIME-Version: 1.0 +X-Received: by 10.236.231.101 with SMTP id k95mr3513234yhq.34.1393598534461; + Fri, 28 Feb 2014 06:42:14 -0800 (PST) +Received: by 10.170.58.146 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 06:42:14 -0800 (PST) +In-Reply-To: <20140228052523.GO3180@nl.grid.coop> +References: <CAJHLa0PXHY1qisXhN98DMxgp11ouqkzYMBvrTTNOtwX09T1kZg@mail.gmail.com> + <CA+s+GJC1FgCW9spkViMPvuWNS84Ys33pj=RP1ZpzBCa++e-iMQ@mail.gmail.com> + <530B8000.1070801@monetize.io> <20140228052523.GO3180@nl.grid.coop> +Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 04:42:14 -1000 +Message-ID: <CAEz79Po37XkoQ=+kQOTdagVn-vYuqYwotQf58YcgTndaaAmXNw@mail.gmail.com> +From: "Warren Togami Jr." <wtogami@gmail.com> +To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> +Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bfeafd49b2f4504f37871de +X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) +X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. + See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. + -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for + sender-domain + 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider + (wtogami[at]gmail.com) + -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record + 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message + -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from + author's domain + 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, + not necessarily valid + -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature +X-Headers-End: 1WJOdn-0000kb-VV +Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] On OP_RETURN in upcoming 0.9 release +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 +Precedence: list +List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 14:42:21 -0000 + +--047d7bfeafd49b2f4504f37871de +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 + +On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Troy Benjegerdes <hozer@hozed.org> wrote: + +> +> Either the transaction fees are sufficient to pay the cost for whatever +> random junk anyone wants to put there, or they are not, and if they are +> not, then I suggest you re-think the fee structure rather than trying +> to pre-regulate me putting 80 character pithy quotes in the blockhain. +> +> +https://github.com/litecoin-project/litecoin/commit/db4d8e21d99551bef4c807aa1534a074e4b7964d + +In one way in particular, the transaction fees per kilobyte completely +failed to account for the actual cost to the network. If Bitcoin had +adopted a common-sense rule like this, I would have had no reason to join +Litecoin development last year. This is one of the few economic design +flaws that Satoshi overlooked in the original design. + +As much as I personally hate the idea of data storage in the blockchain, +this at least discourages the creation of permanent UTXO. + +Warren Togami + +--047d7bfeafd49b2f4504f37871de +Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Troy Benjegerdes <sp= +an dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:hozer@hozed.org" target=3D"_blank">hoz= +er@hozed.org</a>></span> wrote:<br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div= + class=3D"gmail_quote"> +<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-= +left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;p= +adding-left:1ex"><br> +Either the transaction fees are sufficient to pay the cost for whatever<br> +random junk anyone wants to put there, or they are not, and if they are<br> +not, then I suggest you re-think the fee structure rather than trying<br> +to pre-regulate me putting 80 character pithy quotes in the blockhain.<br> +<div class=3D""><div class=3D"h5"><br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></d= +iv><a href=3D"https://github.com/litecoin-project/litecoin/commit/db4d8e21d= +99551bef4c807aa1534a074e4b7964d">https://github.com/litecoin-project/liteco= +in/commit/db4d8e21d99551bef4c807aa1534a074e4b7964d</a><br> +<div><br></div><div>In one way in particular, the transaction fees per kilo= +byte completely failed to account for the actual cost to the network. =C2= +=A0If Bitcoin had adopted a common-sense rule like this, I would have had n= +o reason to join Litecoin development last year. =C2=A0This is one of the f= +ew economic design flaws that Satoshi overlooked in the original design.</d= +iv> +<div><br></div><div>As much as I personally hate the idea of data storage i= +n the blockchain, this at least discourages the creation of permanent UTXO.= +</div><div><br></div><div>Warren Togami</div></div></div></div> + +--047d7bfeafd49b2f4504f37871de-- + + |