diff options
| author | Jeremy Rubin <jeremy.l.rubin@gmail.com> | 2022-01-29 09:02:37 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2022-01-29 17:02:52 +0000 |
| commit | 849f456e0675524d86c36909cb1491487b41d422 (patch) | |
| tree | 57a6e3fb1802468306a21d689f71d9e30d340b1d | |
| parent | a8b41c31770065e51100f709c3e06789fa359241 (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-849f456e0675524d86c36909cb1491487b41d422.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-849f456e0675524d86c36909cb1491487b41d422.zip | |
Re: [bitcoin-dev] TXHASH + CHECKSIGFROMSTACKVERIFY in lieu of CTV and ANYPREVOUT
| -rw-r--r-- | 7a/1a216a1f242b254b9bce57b941f4eea7156c39 | 133 |
1 files changed, 133 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/7a/1a216a1f242b254b9bce57b941f4eea7156c39 b/7a/1a216a1f242b254b9bce57b941f4eea7156c39 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..547316f44 --- /dev/null +++ b/7a/1a216a1f242b254b9bce57b941f4eea7156c39 @@ -0,0 +1,133 @@ +Return-Path: <jeremy.l.rubin@gmail.com> +Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) + by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81FB6C000B + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Sat, 29 Jan 2022 17:02:52 +0000 (UTC) +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A1A183E19 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Sat, 29 Jan 2022 17:02:52 +0000 (UTC) +X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -2.098 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, + DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, + HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, + SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no +Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org (amavisd-new); + dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com +Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id 5wcvjIIg46Sp + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Sat, 29 Jan 2022 17:02:51 +0000 (UTC) +X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 +Received: from mail-lf1-x130.google.com (mail-lf1-x130.google.com + [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::130]) + by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A3A083E17 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Sat, 29 Jan 2022 17:02:51 +0000 (UTC) +Received: by mail-lf1-x130.google.com with SMTP id z4so18034656lft.3 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Sat, 29 Jan 2022 09:02:51 -0800 (PST) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; + h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; + bh=3Q9T9a3OQ9X1M63XF52eG9pH980qPbvqrPgG2xltHEQ=; + b=lG3snBiB1JmnfD3m5Ozoy+rOzdu4xvr9ubM/JwVQL8wJCpic5LQ1oTdxNjzIVTnbl7 + x7RweGTLheT4GFKbWdRRbk/nQ337svAzif6inMA2zvfqB+YzJQlzhCL0kzeIJ9Ax8Y+M + vQbquYaVwa9O4USKqqjwu1OLRYpLXM6+NlJdc2W7x/5g7i5k0IEfCA+mHVeDXTCu+WYY + JAUCmnk9cdZu+dcl3obygtri/ngsxdzy58gsHXxpwYdkzz7TBSZMxRqKRwNTi8VhTFXO + vZtC0/pZH705NNjpqtmnNeih9hQ4XYogguYROrqQmSbd6jgPePLDDxEKJsJLO/Gryqta + qu5Q== +X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; + d=1e100.net; s=20210112; + h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date + :message-id:subject:to; + bh=3Q9T9a3OQ9X1M63XF52eG9pH980qPbvqrPgG2xltHEQ=; + b=V0s+C0yCm5tc10xDxCizxC10N+4Mo8ZQRjamSFaw5UaJvRKreIMRXSQwEB79A5wBj9 + VLP5N5qccADNs9PUGKLQhT7lFayEzN/G+GSnKhzlJyyeDvSFHMO+iUnuB9kgqQp5ErdZ + 563xU7rmbWCQ63r9Hj9GJYmzDsKsrPH1V5C2bIy6VDT9RuRiWdrOaOVCjtJzklg0vbdF + rM29sW/hTdOyKb8YW9Ufhrz3MpNDtveu61Qe6UD5wui55yIrrpULl7yTIs1W5ghiYVVn + qaBFiHD1sMyoRMkN6OxIWBQWK8oVD8h6LY+SvWiqdMXqTd6Y8O2g7GRmNM8ssqgUghJJ + fMhQ== +X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530V2ywEsG6m0OnhNRh0MtEaCZfDQRsHIbjD4ByjLYVNml5qnWjP + TJH5VEhaCfmAMjjmFczH2LJuDdHr1/GuR4G9e90= +X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzmLOOFnRNF2GwXiQElICH2W5RPx1MjTYfY2ei9Y/qTMydqdiBTpHp4ozwnzjiIH2T2o41UgQ2lulzmXoxOmhw= +X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5fc7:: with SMTP id q7mr9611162lfg.175.1643475769254; + Sat, 29 Jan 2022 09:02:49 -0800 (PST) +MIME-Version: 1.0 +References: <CAMZUoK=pkZuovtifBzdqhoyegzG+9hRTFEc7fG9nZPDK4KbU3w@mail.gmail.com> + <CAD5xwhhwqJ_AETAb3p_zUZmRX-Dzh8J9G984zwEs=KFsGN8aNQ@mail.gmail.com> + <CAMZUoKmU1cwUAQaBv5m8oo8H3TWBvgsZ_OkQaMC0n0+3cpFtWg@mail.gmail.com> + <CAPfvXfLr4n6RsS6VbEZR59=MRwAx41Crx88ko8-qnRXW4nFYGA@mail.gmail.com> + <CAMZUoKkvoJs0WtN71A_qRSwToP4YnY707WdW3C-KJYGXsmkjSw@mail.gmail.com> + <CAPfvXfLWtDvgJYwQCaxnww5jyQkqFsi6aG0OUxtp3Okx_ab7Hw@mail.gmail.com> + <CAMZUoKkqEx5mh9Aq9XFc=7YPKmfObMzEipECFuWm4e3q_tVEEQ@mail.gmail.com> +In-Reply-To: <CAMZUoKkqEx5mh9Aq9XFc=7YPKmfObMzEipECFuWm4e3q_tVEEQ@mail.gmail.com> +From: Jeremy Rubin <jeremy.l.rubin@gmail.com> +Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2022 09:02:37 -0800 +Message-ID: <CAD5xwhjsVA7k7ZQ_QdrcZOxdi+L6L7dvqAj1Mhx+zmBA3DM5zw@mail.gmail.com> +To: "Russell O'Connor" <roconnor@blockstream.com>, + Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006c662505d6bb857a" +Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] TXHASH + CHECKSIGFROMSTACKVERIFY in lieu of CTV + and ANYPREVOUT +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2022 17:02:52 -0000 + +--0000000000006c662505d6bb857a +Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" + +Perhaps there is some misunderstanding. TXHASH + CSFSV doesn't allow for +complex or recursive covenants. Typically CAT is needed, at minimum, to +create those sorts of things. TXHASH still amounts to deploying a +non-recursive covenant construction. + + +This seems false to me. + +<Only hash a single input scriptpubkey> txhash <only hash a single output +scriptpubkey> txhash equalverify + +Is that not a recursive covenant? With a little extra work you can also +control for amounts and stuff. + +--0000000000006c662505d6bb857a +Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +<div dir=3D"auto"><div style=3D"color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8px" dir=3D= +"auto"><div dir=3D"auto"><div class=3D"elided-text"><blockquote style=3D"ma= +rgin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:= +1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"elided-text"><div><br><br></div><div>Pe= +rhaps there is some misunderstanding.=C2=A0 TXHASH=C2=A0+ CSFSV doesn't= + allow for complex or recursive covenants.=C2=A0 Typically CAT is needed, a= +t minimum, to create those sorts of things.=C2=A0 TXHASH still amounts to d= +eploying a non-recursive covenant construction.<br></div><div><br></div><di= +v></div></div></div></blockquote></div></div><div dir=3D"auto"><div class= +=3D"elided-text"><blockquote style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:= +1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D= +"elided-text"><div></div></div></div></blockquote></div></div><div dir=3D"a= +uto"><br></div></div><div dir=3D"auto" style=3D"font-size:12.8px">This seem= +s false to me.=C2=A0</div><div dir=3D"auto" style=3D"font-size:12.8px"><br>= +</div><div dir=3D"auto" style=3D"font-size:12.8px"><Only hash a single i= +nput scriptpubkey> txhash <only hash a single output scriptpubkey>= + txhash equalverify</div><div dir=3D"auto" style=3D"font-size:12.8px"><br><= +/div><div dir=3D"auto" style=3D"font-size:12.8px">Is that not a recursive c= +ovenant? With a little extra work you can also control for amounts and stuf= +f.</div></div> + +--0000000000006c662505d6bb857a-- + |