summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorHarald Schilly <harald@schil.ly>2011-12-16 21:14:53 +0100
committerbitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>2011-12-16 20:15:30 +0000
commit5f852b9fa9b9c301d32d75b17b69e6163c241d49 (patch)
treea7242a0fa363b54a9ed648e70f9ceecd70f45d4b
parent1c17d21b6d3079afe7420711f8bd3767c6e8e85f (diff)
downloadpi-bitcoindev-5f852b9fa9b9c301d32d75b17b69e6163c241d49.tar.gz
pi-bitcoindev-5f852b9fa9b9c301d32d75b17b69e6163c241d49.zip
Re: [Bitcoin-development] [BIP 15] Aliases
-rw-r--r--8f/203bd9e19433f966c181f79a4163bc461a8bda72
1 files changed, 72 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/8f/203bd9e19433f966c181f79a4163bc461a8bda b/8f/203bd9e19433f966c181f79a4163bc461a8bda
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..279c9bede
--- /dev/null
+++ b/8f/203bd9e19433f966c181f79a4163bc461a8bda
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
+ helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
+ by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
+ (envelope-from <harald.schilly@gmail.com>) id 1RbeBm-00016K-63
+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:15:30 +0000
+Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
+ designates 209.85.210.175 as permitted sender)
+ client-ip=209.85.210.175; envelope-from=harald.schilly@gmail.com;
+ helo=mail-iy0-f175.google.com;
+Received: from mail-iy0-f175.google.com ([209.85.210.175])
+ by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
+ (Exim 4.76) id 1RbeBl-0003sM-AZ
+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:15:30 +0000
+Received: by iakh37 with SMTP id h37so1792828iak.34
+ for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
+ Fri, 16 Dec 2011 12:15:24 -0800 (PST)
+Received: by 10.50.45.225 with SMTP id q1mr10502742igm.89.1324066524125; Fri,
+ 16 Dec 2011 12:15:24 -0800 (PST)
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Sender: harald.schilly@gmail.com
+Received: by 10.50.10.168 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 12:14:53 -0800 (PST)
+In-Reply-To: <1324066230.24980.YahooMailNeo@web121004.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
+References: <1323728469.78044.YahooMailNeo@web121012.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
+ <1323979147.27319.140661012141129@webmail.messagingengine.com>
+ <4EEB7E98.8030006@dot-bit.org>
+ <CAJna-HjXp4XEHnbmX0HKsMDmnxoWQQMmqujN+D9nLV0Zz_omcg@mail.gmail.com>
+ <1324066230.24980.YahooMailNeo@web121004.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
+From: Harald Schilly <harald@schil.ly>
+Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 21:14:53 +0100
+X-Google-Sender-Auth: Rz8uWPmrOdV1QMB-pkTqb7eqxM8
+Message-ID: <CAGG4CB6sirBDSRyDWm_Ez7VxwbO0ETjR+HNdJdk7ze_HA7i3uw@mail.gmail.com>
+To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
+X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-)
+X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
+ See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
+ -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
+ sender-domain
+ 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
+ (harald.schilly[at]gmail.com)
+ -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
+ 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
+ not necessarily valid
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
+X-Headers-End: 1RbeBl-0003sM-AZ
+Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] [BIP 15] Aliases
+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:15:30 -0000
+
+On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 21:10, Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com> wrote:
+> Especially when we already have bitcoin addresses with their own checksums-
+> what value do IBANs add?
+
+Well, I'm not an expert like you, but one benefit would be to be
+compatible with existing software solutions that are based on using
+IBANs.
+
+H
+
+