+Return-Path: <aymeric@peersm.com>

+Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137])

+ by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC71BC0012

+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;

+ Mon, 13 Dec 2021 13:17:21 +0000 (UTC)

+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])

+ by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4AA0421BF

+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;

+ Mon, 13 Dec 2021 13:17:21 +0000 (UTC)

+X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org

+X-Spam-Flag: NO

+X-Spam-Score: -1.898

+X-Spam-Level:

+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5

+ tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001,

+ RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,

+ SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no

+Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])

+ by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)

+ with ESMTP id NoQk2_x0Tm3S

+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;

+ Mon, 13 Dec 2021 13:17:19 +0000 (UTC)

+X-Greylist: delayed 00:30:07 by SQLgrey-1.8.0

+Received: from 2.mo552.mail-out.ovh.net (2.mo552.mail-out.ovh.net

+ [178.33.105.233])

+ by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9094D421BD

+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;

+ Mon, 13 Dec 2021 13:17:19 +0000 (UTC)

+Received: from mxplan6.mail.ovh.net (unknown [10.108.20.55])

+ by mo552.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BA3B22E8A;

+ Mon, 13 Dec 2021 12:40:51 +0000 (UTC)

+Received: from peersm.com (37.59.142.105) by DAG6EX1.mxp6.local (172.16.2.51)

+ with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2,

+ cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.17; Mon, 13 Dec

+ 2021 13:40:50 +0100

+Authentication-Results: garm.ovh; auth=pass

+ (GARM-105G00618b28c72-cb7c-403e-b16a-cd90d8993fa9,

+ E5D1569A86B6CA2C96D54010462A08A8BE481A6F) smtp.auth=aymeric@peersm.com

+X-OVh-ClientIp: 92.184.100.56

+To: Pieter Wuille <bitcoin-dev@wuille.net>, Bitcoin Protocol Discussion

+ <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>, Prayank <prayank@tutanota.de>

+References: <MqZttWy--3-2@tutanota.de>

+ <1fbf0ef8b1b42979361b5df0b09c2dcd@willtech.com.au>

+ <dSBrti8VFr0lMNgTHw8pD-mAPLm0E4auJa234o0FNY67EUuEy1Dfb93INNIzoUb3j2dWSJjZtG7qncci1LhKAHOXzAzbEWOtXjnggr19J6w=@wuille.net>

+ <86d49c80-2f8f-245c-5fdb-17c6ca6b5f2b@peersm.com>

+ <CALL-=e5mv5cr=Oqip0ob8P2XCbWPgOc67nnRjn7_OuDXPYUpVg@mail.gmail.com>

+ <10dcd9a9-0c39-7f4f-acde-04912a32e103@peersm.com>

+ <cd6J1hP7ryGspj5LgGk8uwSsh5FGoDwW9UCp4qHhbSn3MXgzMw1slbo8xwWv9kZxn95CcPPE5elPiOktz4-1drpiOgfi-TtGzr66cdS6AuI=@wuille.net>

+From: Aymeric Vitte <aymeric@peersm.com>

+Message-ID: <6341eec0-e6d8-fe15-4fde-b98d87b00c92@peersm.com>

+Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 13:40:51 +0100

+User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101

+ Thunderbird/45.4.0

+MIME-Version: 1.0

+In-Reply-To: <cd6J1hP7ryGspj5LgGk8uwSsh5FGoDwW9UCp4qHhbSn3MXgzMw1slbo8xwWv9kZxn95CcPPE5elPiOktz4-1drpiOgfi-TtGzr66cdS6AuI=@wuille.net>

+Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"

+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

+X-Originating-IP: [37.59.142.105]

+X-ClientProxiedBy: DAG4EX2.mxp6.local (172.16.2.32) To DAG6EX1.mxp6.local

+ (172.16.2.51)

+X-Ovh-Tracer-GUID: 54c24d42-7e95-4345-9ef4-e9a552241709

+X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 4562990851737215965

+X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK

+X-VR-SPAMSCORE: 0

+X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrkeekgdegfecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjpdevjffgvefmvefgnecuuegrihhlohhuthemucehtddtnecunecujfgurhepuffvfhfhkffffgggjggtgfhisehtqhertddtfeehnecuhfhrohhmpeethihmvghrihgtucggihhtthgvuceorgihmhgvrhhitgesphgvvghrshhmrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeukeehhffhfeehtdegveeijeevvddvieevheffkeelteevfeetieejtdehfefgveenucffohhmrghinhepphgvvghrshhmrdgtohhmnecukfhppedtrddtrddtrddtpdefjedrheelrddugedvrddutdehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdphhgvlhhopehmgihplhgrnheirdhmrghilhdrohhvhhdrnhgvthdpihhnvghtpedtrddtrddtrddtpdhmrghilhhfrhhomheprgihmhgvrhhitgesphgvvghrshhmrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepsghithgtohhinhdquggvvhesfihuihhllhgvrdhnvght

+X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 13:46:14 +0000

+Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Rebroadcast mechanism in Bitcoin P2P network

+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org

+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15

+Precedence: list

+List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>

+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,

+ <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>

+List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>

+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>

+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>

+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,

+ <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>

+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 13:17:21 -0000

+

+

+> It's just one example of a downside of (a particular way of) using

+> Tor. That doesn't mean I recommend against using Tor for Bitcoin

+> traffic at all; my point was simply that there are trade-offs, and

+> aspects of privacy of the P2P protocol that Tor does not address, and

+> thus one shouldn't assume that all problems are solved by "just use Tor=

+".

+There are many downsides since the default behavior of the Tor network

+does not apply to p2p networks, another example is a bitcoin node

+exiting transactions (I thought you were referring to this), since the

+same Tor circuit is used during some time most likely the transactions

+are related to the same node even if we don't know its IP

+

+According to the bitcoin github example discussion link I gave, I am not

+saying that Tor network nodes should not be used, I am saying that they

+should be used =E0 la node-Tor, or more precisely like the github example=

+

+and http://www.peersm.com/Convergence-2020.pdf, one of the main

+differences are how behave the first node (ie the originating bitcoin

+node), HS/RDV, nb of hops, hybrid nodes

+

+Another drawback is that bitcoin community lets bitcoin nodes operators

+play the way they like with torrc

+

+@Prayank, regarding js/webrtc my previous answer was not partial, please

+email in private if you need more, it's just a part of the project (but

+important since disruptive), which is already advertised widely

+(bitcoin, ipfs, covid apps, videoconf, etc, there are plenty of links on

+github, lists, specs discussion, probably I should reference them), the

+answer is always the same: "very interesting, go ahead", but no, it is

+designed to be integrated by the projects, not by myself, and the only

+thing missing to get rid of myself is to release phase4

+

+

+