diff options
| author | Jan Møller <jan.moller@gmail.com> | 2014-04-22 10:49:41 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2014-04-22 08:49:52 +0000 |
| commit | 3d9d9cc5a1082a70ea26ec46b73848998b284083 (patch) | |
| tree | ef9674dcec8ae14fc770d15723ab2046e285dee5 | |
| parent | fa3e69c9ac41df5b7fb2ee1c04b10f709befe864 (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-3d9d9cc5a1082a70ea26ec46b73848998b284083.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-3d9d9cc5a1082a70ea26ec46b73848998b284083.zip | |
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Presenting a BIP for Shamir's Secret Sharing of Bitcoin private keys
| -rw-r--r-- | 09/752dee6cb9009b4a580d7858cd9acb7f69a653 | 131 |
1 files changed, 131 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/09/752dee6cb9009b4a580d7858cd9acb7f69a653 b/09/752dee6cb9009b4a580d7858cd9acb7f69a653 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..8c2e435ab --- /dev/null +++ b/09/752dee6cb9009b4a580d7858cd9acb7f69a653 @@ -0,0 +1,131 @@ +Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] + helo=mx.sourceforge.net) + by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) + (envelope-from <jan.moller@gmail.com>) id 1WcWOm-00084U-Al + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:49:52 +0000 +Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com + designates 209.85.216.53 as permitted sender) + client-ip=209.85.216.53; envelope-from=jan.moller@gmail.com; + helo=mail-qa0-f53.google.com; +Received: from mail-qa0-f53.google.com ([209.85.216.53]) + by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) + (Exim 4.76) id 1WcWOg-0003lQ-Jf + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:49:52 +0000 +Received: by mail-qa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id w8so4671083qac.26 + for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>; + Tue, 22 Apr 2014 01:49:41 -0700 (PDT) +MIME-Version: 1.0 +X-Received: by 10.140.16.198 with SMTP id 64mr50017679qgb.10.1398156581183; + Tue, 22 Apr 2014 01:49:41 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by 10.140.24.201 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 01:49:41 -0700 (PDT) +In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgQJ2EULensrGfB-Rj95+MyxtkQFUHaKs_bJOOBBTqPE_Q@mail.gmail.com> +References: <CAC7yFxSE8-TWPN-kuFiqdPKMDuprbiVJi7-z-ym+AUyA_f-xJw@mail.gmail.com> + <6669921.kYEqrMqt0u@crushinator> + <CAAS2fgSfiYwD-M7+k65JF0Kjeod1zEiPcxPN1iDBHLzYV7UQyA@mail.gmail.com> + <16848732.PiyLLsBBZa@crushinator> + <CAC7yFxR7XWtFSMeHgbMZOMKbr+kK_7Ezb7zBUQP08rfC0am9sQ@mail.gmail.com> + <CABh=4qNaJht-MnnjEguZ=UOuXN3uQ-s4-dkDUVErbHj6W44J_g@mail.gmail.com> + <CAAS2fgQJ2EULensrGfB-Rj95+MyxtkQFUHaKs_bJOOBBTqPE_Q@mail.gmail.com> +Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 10:49:41 +0200 +Message-ID: <CABh=4qPMtnZsPfanJgi63vo6Bt4TTQLx7EqJh268+NUxb4gC7A@mail.gmail.com> +From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jan_M=C3=B8ller?= <jan.moller@gmail.com> +To: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com> +Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c0ff125ca7b904f79db2d9 +X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) +X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. + See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. + -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for + sender-domain + 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider + (jan.moller[at]gmail.com) + -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record + 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message + -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from + author's domain + 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, + not necessarily valid + -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature +X-Headers-End: 1WcWOg-0003lQ-Jf +Cc: bitcoin-development <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> +Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Presenting a BIP for Shamir's Secret + Sharing of Bitcoin private keys +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 +Precedence: list +Reply-To: jan.moller@gmail.com +List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:49:52 -0000 + +--001a11c0ff125ca7b904f79db2d9 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +I did comment on it back in october ( +https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3D258678.msg3298089#msg3298089) :-) +But I must admit that I haven't been tracking it since then. + +I have never been a proponent of BIP 38 (which this BIP is derived from) +and generally think that encrypting a secret with a human generated +password is silly for many reasons (Let me know if I should repeat my list +of concerns). As far as I remember we are pretty much on the same page here= +. +Using SSS is superior in every way that I can think of. + + +On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>wrote= +: + +> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 1:06 AM, Jan M=C3=B8ller <jan.moller@gmail.com> w= +rote: +> > This is a very useful BIP, and I am very much looking forward to +> > implementing it in Mycelium, in particular for bip32 wallets. +> +> I haven't seen commentary from you on the Kogelman draft, it would be +> helpful there: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3D258678.0 +> + +--001a11c0ff125ca7b904f79db2d9 +Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +<div dir=3D"ltr">I did comment on it back in october (<a href=3D"https://bi= +tcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3D258678.msg3298089#msg3298089">https://bitco= +intalk.org/index.php?topic=3D258678.msg3298089#msg3298089</a>) :-)<div>But = +I must admit that I haven't been tracking it since then.</div> +<div><br></div><div>I have never been a proponent of BIP 38 (which this BIP= + is derived from) and generally think that encrypting a secret with a human= + generated password is silly for many reasons (Let me know if I should repe= +at my list of concerns). As far as I remember we are pretty much on the sam= +e page here.</div> +<div>Using SSS is superior in every way that I can think of.</div></div><di= +v class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Apr 22, = +2014 at 10:15 AM, Gregory Maxwell <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:g= +maxwell@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">gmaxwell@gmail.com</a>></span> wrot= +e:<br> +<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p= +x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class=3D"">On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 1:06= + AM, Jan M=C3=B8ller <<a href=3D"mailto:jan.moller@gmail.com">jan.moller= +@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br> + +> This is a very useful BIP, and I am very much looking forward to<br> +> implementing it in Mycelium, in particular for bip32 wallets.<br> +<br> +</div>I haven't seen commentary from you on the Kogelman draft, it woul= +d be<br> +helpful there: <a href=3D"https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3D258678.= +0" target=3D"_blank">https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3D258678.0</a>= +<br> +</blockquote></div><br></div> + +--001a11c0ff125ca7b904f79db2d9-- + + |