summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com>2015-08-07 13:35:29 -0500
committerbitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>2015-08-07 18:35:32 +0000
commit014f5179e788ba49d8146e161566bd55274c0c95 (patch)
tree94f78220a5eefa2c69204ffc00d85e89439ec23e
parent49536a052cc533980b5103071c471efabc768bf8 (diff)
downloadpi-bitcoindev-014f5179e788ba49d8146e161566bd55274c0c95.tar.gz
pi-bitcoindev-014f5179e788ba49d8146e161566bd55274c0c95.zip
Re: [bitcoin-dev] Fees and the block-finding process
-rw-r--r--78/0278a96f6008593b793eba97ff8d53388ef950104
1 files changed, 104 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/78/0278a96f6008593b793eba97ff8d53388ef950 b/78/0278a96f6008593b793eba97ff8d53388ef950
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..87c3653d0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/78/0278a96f6008593b793eba97ff8d53388ef950
@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
+Return-Path: <kanzure@gmail.com>
+Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
+ [172.17.192.35])
+ by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B1508EB
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Fri, 7 Aug 2015 18:35:32 +0000 (UTC)
+X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
+Received: from mail-la0-f47.google.com (mail-la0-f47.google.com
+ [209.85.215.47])
+ by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CA64246
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Fri, 7 Aug 2015 18:35:31 +0000 (UTC)
+Received: by lagz9 with SMTP id z9so26795170lag.3
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Fri, 07 Aug 2015 11:35:29 -0700 (PDT)
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
+ h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
+ :cc:content-type;
+ bh=qUreCvT2gPGm898o25rkjrj2592iqHTXUzVNBvDwLqo=;
+ b=Ap9z/BUHzGVVdl1hV2iMlXMHIRX+bsiOZutgyLsnlVcm7fYKWlpf//fzqAoT4uszbP
+ BYa7pdv218468/tQ3luxyhy0GDlcMALZ9TmENRrgLLXTrmUejJ+NFwwf/m4bqXwaOaQH
+ OGre6aAWh442U8Iy1a01mpWJhVMCNygA453R7Ru5KqSh2z+TTswTyxtFAtSQN4yMP7Nc
+ mQS9nz1bf2+j8fnoRLL2gBD6Eb7I/4i66KaRnomfmw9h2UawgyXPJtsU+n9lhzMvEHEo
+ B9Mp6Av7SvkRKweLyGn3nCoChLSfXkFoVfd9iGLUHAr24dETKaTjHmK5pIHgCgFznCiv
+ mUWg==
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+X-Received: by 10.112.130.7 with SMTP id oa7mr8624893lbb.30.1438972529723;
+ Fri, 07 Aug 2015 11:35:29 -0700 (PDT)
+Received: by 10.152.18.166 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 11:35:29 -0700 (PDT)
+In-Reply-To: <6786132febd22f90c4107285920d76ca@xbt.hk>
+References: <CABsx9T16fH+56isq95m4+QWsKwP==tf75ep8ghnEcBoV4OtZJA@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CAPg+sBgOt=qhQVZv5P-4mcD75=L4PKgOfRqhyB6FZdSYQajrwQ@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CABsx9T10y6-=c7Qg6jysnf38wRX3NA3wWozxGfE+mEYJvPeqWA@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CAPg+sBiaT-2sjedA1mLOQo+q7=DjJ2yRuy7E4Gb3Wn8R-DzRTQ@mail.gmail.com>
+ <6786132febd22f90c4107285920d76ca@xbt.hk>
+Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 13:35:29 -0500
+Message-ID: <CABaSBaxxopW0yZr0Bhmit3d=QDcGp=XNVmbGFhawhhQx4p4m9g@mail.gmail.com>
+From: Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com>
+To: jl2012@xbt.hk, Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com>
+Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b3a8b0079d190051cbce6a8
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
+ DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
+ autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
+X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
+ smtp1.linux-foundation.org
+Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Fees and the block-finding process
+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 18:35:32 -0000
+
+--047d7b3a8b0079d190051cbce6a8
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
+
+On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 1:17 PM, jl2012 via bitcoin-dev <
+bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
+
+> No, I'm not trolling. I really want someone to tell me why we
+> should/shouldn't reduce the block size. Are we going to have more or less
+> full nodes if we reduce the block size?
+
+
+Some arguments have floated around that even in the absence of "causing an
+increase in the number of full nodes", that a reduction of the max block
+size might be beneficial for other reasons, such as bandwidth saturation
+benefits. Also less time spent validating transactions because of the fewer
+transactions.
+
+- Bryan
+http://heybryan.org/
+1 512 203 0507
+
+--047d7b3a8b0079d190051cbce6a8
+Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
+
+<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On F=
+ri, Aug 7, 2015 at 1:17 PM, jl2012 via bitcoin-dev <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a=
+ href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">bi=
+tcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote cl=
+ass=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;p=
+adding-left:1ex">No, I&#39;m not trolling. I really want someone to tell me=
+ why we should/shouldn&#39;t reduce the block size. Are we going to have mo=
+re or less full nodes if we reduce the block size?</blockquote></div><br>So=
+me arguments have floated around that even in the absence of &quot;causing =
+an increase in the number of full nodes&quot;, that a reduction of the max =
+block size might be beneficial for other reasons, such as bandwidth saturat=
+ion benefits. Also less time spent validating transactions because of the f=
+ewer transactions.=C2=A0<br><div><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_signature">-=
+ Bryan<br><a href=3D"http://heybryan.org/" target=3D"_blank">http://heybrya=
+n.org/</a><br>1 512 203 0507</div>
+</div></div>
+
+--047d7b3a8b0079d190051cbce6a8--
+