diff options
author | Erik Aronesty <erik@q32.com> | 2017-04-17 11:50:51 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2017-04-17 15:50:55 +0000 |
commit | 4b0724ef83b468087505eb669b405c397c38ba42 (patch) | |
tree | 9d5176a39627df063391fa23d9a52574f86dea5a /9b | |
parent | 8c0b152c167f82d1db264eea0919c13c54cbe7ba (diff) | |
download | pi-bitcoindev-4b0724ef83b468087505eb669b405c397c38ba42.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-4b0724ef83b468087505eb669b405c397c38ba42.zip |
[bitcoin-dev] Transaction signalling
Diffstat (limited to '9b')
-rw-r--r-- | 9b/76a2ee363922ee8f0e412ae64406bd1830150f | 110 |
1 files changed, 110 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/9b/76a2ee363922ee8f0e412ae64406bd1830150f b/9b/76a2ee363922ee8f0e412ae64406bd1830150f new file mode 100644 index 000000000..a979b6f26 --- /dev/null +++ b/9b/76a2ee363922ee8f0e412ae64406bd1830150f @@ -0,0 +1,110 @@ +Return-Path: <earonesty@gmail.com> +Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org + [172.17.192.35]) + by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9075AB8A + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Mon, 17 Apr 2017 15:50:55 +0000 (UTC) +X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 +Received: from mail-qk0-f182.google.com (mail-qk0-f182.google.com + [209.85.220.182]) + by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D61019C + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Mon, 17 Apr 2017 15:50:54 +0000 (UTC) +Received: by mail-qk0-f182.google.com with SMTP id h67so107971080qke.0 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Mon, 17 Apr 2017 08:50:54 -0700 (PDT) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; + h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id + :subject:to; bh=TiC9TkqZd4KH7mrEBi91o4DVkQoQUu8osqbQR6CzxA0=; + b=tMqe1lhwDrczMkYVeuVRNdpEtdjrLpGVRgoOZWTL+AgaWLV3Gc2MwKnsmk0Jt7fIP9 + bSFWVTk6KUOtMzYjAILMgaZzJVKBb9mVngHCO7vYHVjq7AueUKgz6BjN5Hg4mLTeuLjf + YR0/VUF7RHSMS7USeYrBAtHMsymW3t6icN+ZunNasQop9g58Tv3RL1c9XmaVVxHTxwyi + zfAJqGkqtDKOyR8N9+jOkkQCOdPWR61TALkfiuH8wQ9Dr3pwY/KOUMHjjW68c0CC8TG/ + Hhity+jBywTX6C0bjP3sEDsapWUGwvRZJfNxSDthQ8lj0whCt1H29+/++cRjCfFlMpOz + zeSg== +X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; + d=1e100.net; s=20161025; + h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from + :date:message-id:subject:to; + bh=TiC9TkqZd4KH7mrEBi91o4DVkQoQUu8osqbQR6CzxA0=; + b=acW596WhoRdRLor/mbBnqksBr3FJLHMw9CgPUkhVdZ8EyDMU9upehX3JPlsX0N7syr + Cx9hh05XFIEeliPSz4+eVM7kFBSeK/Ah7AO4C+CLZtJhH4Cbnd+XE/D/XmSDC0Wx0XEa + LBZVkVOy9CLzshyTBWoWka+m7jGEcuUj+jdTnibSrBfrf7sNv1qLbI2V+8/GG2LHcJ19 + 28rrSvW0q+xj6Shczm51V46zMUD08pvftxzRMl+AkvEarox++ORj+4B1gf/4L06zqGkL + 1zEuSGEX+Njz8hyZW0k4j3eYfRNKCGto10yHs+KdmrySJAYOPWWuubgwP+tTsFL+GHY+ + sbMg== +X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/4Z8LbAyixSf9m+/wLfhmTJUpP8gTyYVal3D4/wwdq4NUtBVlgc + 5EB6KhvCuysoI1OWaoJORUMTgaP68qQk +X-Received: by 10.55.98.145 with SMTP id w139mr9732885qkb.197.1492444253492; + Mon, 17 Apr 2017 08:50:53 -0700 (PDT) +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Sender: earonesty@gmail.com +Received: by 10.200.0.146 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 08:50:51 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by 10.200.0.146 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 08:50:51 -0700 (PDT) +In-Reply-To: <CAJowKgJ-eoF6ZCKrWbJQDcMK8-jTZxD+J_6tGAyfXz+HYrqmXg@mail.gmail.com> +References: <CAJowKgJ38kA_vPGF6KpKEnrRzStrk-Mj87bttaOw-dvLW675Jw@mail.gmail.com> + <CAJowKgK4j=sL2vh1bxWh2WWw0vw1PuxfJ39JW7bQS-UDzKh6CQ@mail.gmail.com> + <CAJowKgKAnrMKiLdONrXJtGQYhYgRSXq7JNWrY=zUEMvw4WSX9w@mail.gmail.com> + <CAJowKgL-NB0zF-Ud52Jr6n0Fo-uV=bXzVAFMOKmhAVA0RdRVuQ@mail.gmail.com> + <CAJowKgJGZJMondTmsdOLdqqY1mf9S+TaB8UmdCtsLF6PA2RSJw@mail.gmail.com> + <CAJowKg+gZcNO+-sdmt55KOt+zuN+8m7Hiqh77s9=gYpyszDwmA@mail.gmail.com> + <CAJowKgKC4+6vv0QUH_DRASVqU4jui-iXG6TDgEpGUHRkVwJFqg@mail.gmail.com> + <CAJowKgKH2h1QwpEvZ30OuEUsTCg1OoD6JcuXdmS+d_pKpygFcQ@mail.gmail.com> + <CAJowKg+EJGXA5=LjJhCo1YevQtBubEftSNPfnzE4b5ESCwrUMg@mail.gmail.com> + <CAJowKgLQCqL37oCzkJc8gPnUCkPYtF6G8_7Ug4AP5FpTOonBWQ@mail.gmail.com> + <CAJowKgJ-eoF6ZCKrWbJQDcMK8-jTZxD+J_6tGAyfXz+HYrqmXg@mail.gmail.com> +From: Erik Aronesty <erik@q32.com> +Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 11:50:51 -0400 +X-Google-Sender-Auth: hVhaXRWS0O-RONsTjI1L3esWlJk +Message-ID: <CAJowKgKEVxS9OCg=Lioc1gRAy1Ftc27bp3nr2R9MQX-VQ9PrhQ@mail.gmail.com> +To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c0558fe939a9c054d5ec102 +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, + DKIM_VALID, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, + RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1 +X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on + smtp1.linux-foundation.org +X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 15:51:18 +0000 +Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Transaction signalling +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 15:50:55 -0000 + +--94eb2c0558fe939a9c054d5ec102 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 + +If users added a signal to OP_RETURN, might it be possible to tag all +validated input addresses with that signal. + +Then a node can activate a new feature after the percentage of tagged input +addresses reaches a certain level within a certain period of time? + +This could be used in addition to a flag day to trigger activation of a +feature with some reassurance of user uptake. + +--94eb2c0558fe939a9c054d5ec102 +Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +<div dir=3D"auto">If users added a signal to OP_RETURN, might it be possibl= +e to tag all validated input addresses with that signal.<div dir=3D"auto"><= +br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Then a node can activate a new feature after the= + percentage of tagged input addresses reaches a certain level within a cert= +ain period of time?</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">This= + could be used in addition to a flag day to trigger activation of a feature= + with some reassurance of user uptake.</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><di= +v dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br>= +</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"a= +uto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div></div> + +--94eb2c0558fe939a9c054d5ec102-- + |