summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/9a/5228f8d4f5b3d6baf42b51132583f80db01b1e
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>2013-08-07 23:49:00 +0200
committerbitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>2013-08-07 21:49:06 +0000
commit3654ff779e0bc5573faa01c9d47048cd5b908a1a (patch)
tree1f19061d92ec2204abc8c8184069c5012f6c2e7b /9a/5228f8d4f5b3d6baf42b51132583f80db01b1e
parent69b862b8682172d24eca355025736e77e246c37d (diff)
downloadpi-bitcoindev-3654ff779e0bc5573faa01c9d47048cd5b908a1a.tar.gz
pi-bitcoindev-3654ff779e0bc5573faa01c9d47048cd5b908a1a.zip
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Payment Protocol: BIP 70, 71, 72
Diffstat (limited to '9a/5228f8d4f5b3d6baf42b51132583f80db01b1e')
-rw-r--r--9a/5228f8d4f5b3d6baf42b51132583f80db01b1e90
1 files changed, 90 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/9a/5228f8d4f5b3d6baf42b51132583f80db01b1e b/9a/5228f8d4f5b3d6baf42b51132583f80db01b1e
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..c2c5cba41
--- /dev/null
+++ b/9a/5228f8d4f5b3d6baf42b51132583f80db01b1e
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
+ helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
+ by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
+ (envelope-from <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>) id 1V7BbO-0002ik-Ej
+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Wed, 07 Aug 2013 21:49:06 +0000
+Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
+ designates 209.85.223.181 as permitted sender)
+ client-ip=209.85.223.181; envelope-from=pieter.wuille@gmail.com;
+ helo=mail-ie0-f181.google.com;
+Received: from mail-ie0-f181.google.com ([209.85.223.181])
+ by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
+ (Exim 4.76) id 1V7BbN-0005v6-RO
+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Wed, 07 Aug 2013 21:49:06 +0000
+Received: by mail-ie0-f181.google.com with SMTP id x14so461557ief.26
+ for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
+ Wed, 07 Aug 2013 14:49:00 -0700 (PDT)
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+X-Received: by 10.50.124.10 with SMTP id me10mr636141igb.40.1375912140628;
+ Wed, 07 Aug 2013 14:49:00 -0700 (PDT)
+Received: by 10.50.73.74 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Aug 2013 14:49:00 -0700 (PDT)
+In-Reply-To: <CANEZrP17xEKcPOvQEBuDs-JXaMtEuOcRp8UvH4dvVDc=PyyqsA@mail.gmail.com>
+References: <CABsx9T0Ly67ZNJhoRQk0L9Q0-ucq3e=24b5Tg6GRKspRKKtP-g@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CAPg+sBhb3WOYnWRc020QbGwE0W4XeWWmXXTqYyAqrtB7h0+b8A@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CABsx9T0o2BN+UyZt-TYcEXX_U0ztP3Rq3+arr_2C1MPEtU_dUg@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CANEZrP2+D4xu0t2efRPfg0t5gD8RRBk=KQEJH+0FF5J=vBmwiA@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CAPg+sBheF45bsx5it-0v1QjDW--t5UkZZjNjf9wt3d7XgUXLgw@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CANEZrP17xEKcPOvQEBuDs-JXaMtEuOcRp8UvH4dvVDc=PyyqsA@mail.gmail.com>
+Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 23:49:00 +0200
+Message-ID: <CAPg+sBirjUdXu+kWnxpX9Shahf9dxBnGbMF+r75oduej7QFrmQ@mail.gmail.com>
+From: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
+To: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
+X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
+X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
+ See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
+ -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
+ sender-domain
+ 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
+ (pieter.wuille[at]gmail.com)
+ -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
+ author's domain
+ 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
+ not necessarily valid
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
+X-Headers-End: 1V7BbN-0005v6-RO
+Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
+Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Payment Protocol: BIP 70, 71, 72
+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 21:49:06 -0000
+
+On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:44 PM, Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net> wrote:
+>
+>> My concerns here are:
+>> * Making sure wallet applications can function without supporting the
+>> P2P protocol (which drops a huge implementation overhead for simple -
+>> perhaps hardware-based - wallets)
+>
+>
+> How would such wallets get transactions into their wallet in the first
+> place?
+
+By connecting to some other client, presumably. Have a small hardware
+client that is able to do payments via NFC/QR/... directly with a
+merchant, and can get 'recharged' by connecting with your desktop
+client, for example. Maybe too futuristic to be a concern, but it
+nicely illustrates how doing direct sender-to-receiver negotiation can
+help decoupling tasks.
+
+> I don't really have a strong opinion either way, but doing more work to
+> prevent transactions being announced to the network feels weird.
+
+Ok.
+
+--
+Pieter
+
+