diff options
| author | Elliot Olds <elliot.olds@gmail.com> | 2015-08-20 14:11:00 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2015-08-20 21:11:01 +0000 |
| commit | 32bbc310dfb80ba761b08bfec6f15ff13d5c1ee7 (patch) | |
| tree | 3752f95e0f638e8d0c99260f17282dc4751524d5 /7b | |
| parent | c41893d3c3fcfa685d67acccfb052a21aa428711 (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-32bbc310dfb80ba761b08bfec6f15ff13d5c1ee7.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-32bbc310dfb80ba761b08bfec6f15ff13d5c1ee7.zip | |
Re: [bitcoin-dev] A summary list of all concerns related to not rising the block size
Diffstat (limited to '7b')
| -rw-r--r-- | 7b/f44ecc82d1a52680765b7f66597cc7e044fe78 | 112 |
1 files changed, 112 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/7b/f44ecc82d1a52680765b7f66597cc7e044fe78 b/7b/f44ecc82d1a52680765b7f66597cc7e044fe78 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e642b16a2 --- /dev/null +++ b/7b/f44ecc82d1a52680765b7f66597cc7e044fe78 @@ -0,0 +1,112 @@ +Return-Path: <elliot.olds@gmail.com> +Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org + [172.17.192.35]) + by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AB3E826 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Thu, 20 Aug 2015 21:11:01 +0000 (UTC) +X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 +Received: from mail-ig0-f178.google.com (mail-ig0-f178.google.com + [209.85.213.178]) + by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C50C10E + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Thu, 20 Aug 2015 21:11:01 +0000 (UTC) +Received: by igui7 with SMTP id i7so740094igu.0 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:11:00 -0700 (PDT) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; + h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to + :cc:content-type; + bh=+vlV9nyY7aFQQoE68tnApVfXw7yZody72wUOvth/k68=; + b=HcT0xaol32dK8T0QNhR3SPVn2Irfc/+zXxLdFj/lZJH0cmIqJJZMaLBLLhxFyZ2oo1 + KTpheuev6R6+oK1ZTAV9PkOi1T9oYeCHplGxR4DTUXNukwXNLe3iHVdptT7lZucwYsEW + 958VCEPKecLXZKoW+sWf4G6lKqYDtYOQqxzA8F2yUGnMMslaTEoe7gaWRDQAVeSyGXla + N00S/tMOzGS3JiaPhsQGPjfosOGRCck+vPCwYG2WkttkMCvXkZUVkWUPT01tWXSFrMPX + B2p1ok++Jwj6fAKBY83A250/a4PQiCc9/K/588ZBY+N4wHTDQMLRInM6IilWMkuo6gPh + wKVw== +MIME-Version: 1.0 +X-Received: by 10.50.30.36 with SMTP id p4mr75908igh.87.1440105060489; Thu, 20 + Aug 2015 14:11:00 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by 10.79.97.135 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:11:00 -0700 (PDT) +In-Reply-To: <CABm2gDosTUR0rt9ks2n9iEAoe0Z2L8OCQdcw7s39dQSuDG4=tg@mail.gmail.com> +References: <CABm2gDrfB+c1QTZippYYNX-uhcd9NYUcR-VHug6FYtPmSoz4Bw@mail.gmail.com> + <55CB2C57.1070307@mail.bihthai.net> + <CABm2gDp92omWk-eg5Sp8u4V8Z9hJcT_TcwyZyaw3Nm4ypLiWXQ@mail.gmail.com> + <CABm2gDqH2V0D5XWco9AJ_WNcFUyjkaWGj_oonmKZRocqOvqYVw@mail.gmail.com> + <CABm2gDosTUR0rt9ks2n9iEAoe0Z2L8OCQdcw7s39dQSuDG4=tg@mail.gmail.com> +Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:11:00 -0700 +Message-ID: <CA+BnGuH8V7B+R4PONemjdjhmEpQB_yaNouGFMyAgauBFre8F7g@mail.gmail.com> +From: Elliot Olds <elliot.olds@gmail.com> +To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bd7526291dfae051dc49671 +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, + DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW + autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 +X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on + smtp1.linux-foundation.org +Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] A summary list of all concerns related to not + rising the block size +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 21:11:01 -0000 + +--047d7bd7526291dfae051dc49671 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Jorge Tim=C3=B3n < +bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: + +> To be clear, these two are just my personal lists of arguments on +> "each side" to clear my mind and try to be perfectly objective. +> [...] +> Here's the updated both-thread lists: +> +> +> http://0bin.net/paste/igHZMgeoIbYjCJd9#ovaOUlSAKvQYT2p3VXuIuUmNk2XyLH-Gnj= +R5NZMZgFb + + +I thought this was a good idea, so I turned my personal notes into a site +attempting to list all the strongest arguments and counterarguments on the +block size debate. I made mine a bit more detailed. + +Here's the site: https://sites.google.com/site/bitcoinblocksizedebate/ + +Feedback welcome. + +--047d7bd7526291dfae051dc49671 +Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On F= +ri, Aug 14, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Jorge Tim=C3=B3n <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href= +=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">bitcoin= +-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class= +=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padd= +ing-left:1ex">To be clear, these two are just my personal lists of argument= +s on<br> +"each side" to clear my mind and try to be perfectly objective.<b= +r>[...]<br>Here's the updated both-thread lists:<br> +<br> +<a href=3D"http://0bin.net/paste/igHZMgeoIbYjCJd9#ovaOUlSAKvQYT2p3VXuIuUmNk= +2XyLH-GnjR5NZMZgFb" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">http://0bin.net/pa= +ste/igHZMgeoIbYjCJd9#ovaOUlSAKvQYT2p3VXuIuUmNk2XyLH-GnjR5NZMZgFb</a></block= +quote><div><br></div><div>I thought this was a good idea, so I turned my pe= +rsonal notes into a site attempting to list all the strongest arguments and= + counterarguments on the block size debate. I made mine a bit more detailed= +.=C2=A0</div><div><br></div><div>Here's the site:=C2=A0<a href=3D"https= +://sites.google.com/site/bitcoinblocksizedebate/">https://sites.google.com/= +site/bitcoinblocksizedebate/</a></div><div><br></div><div>Feedback welcome.= +=C2=A0</div><div>=C2=A0</div></div></div></div> + +--047d7bd7526291dfae051dc49671-- + |