diff options
| author | Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org> | 2016-02-17 00:46:16 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2016-02-17 00:46:38 +0000 |
| commit | 790d2a657dca0f145b0ddde57f73234de92e648a (patch) | |
| tree | b54218ebad104bf9cf2627740554d65961a375e8 /39 | |
| parent | 4480e106ee7acb2e8433e87047b0cda4b8bc9b1e (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-790d2a657dca0f145b0ddde57f73234de92e648a.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-790d2a657dca0f145b0ddde57f73234de92e648a.zip | |
Re: [bitcoin-dev] [BIP Proposal] New "feefilter" p2p message
Diffstat (limited to '39')
| -rw-r--r-- | 39/c43c2374058ba91d7b0734a0b3383cf8949b4e | 66 |
1 files changed, 66 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/39/c43c2374058ba91d7b0734a0b3383cf8949b4e b/39/c43c2374058ba91d7b0734a0b3383cf8949b4e new file mode 100644 index 000000000..7d176eeeb --- /dev/null +++ b/39/c43c2374058ba91d7b0734a0b3383cf8949b4e @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@ +Return-Path: <luke@dashjr.org> +Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org + [172.17.192.35]) + by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77EA9114F + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Wed, 17 Feb 2016 00:46:38 +0000 (UTC) +X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 +Received: from zinan.dashjr.org (zinan.dashjr.org [192.3.11.21]) + by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BE87121 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Wed, 17 Feb 2016 00:46:38 +0000 (UTC) +Received: from ishibashi.localnet (unknown + [IPv6:2001:470:5:265:61b6:56a6:b03d:28d6]) + (Authenticated sender: luke-jr) + by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 075E838A2305; + Wed, 17 Feb 2016 00:46:26 +0000 (UTC) +X-Hashcash: 1:25:160217:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org::kEdnJsQfeH+DITip:ar375 +X-Hashcash: 1:25:160217:morcos@gmail.com::OUAdxDH1WSsS40EH:CuJP +From: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org> +To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org, + Alex Morcos <morcos@gmail.com> +Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 00:46:16 +0000 +User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/4.1.18-gentoo; KDE/4.14.8; x86_64; ; ) +References: <CAPWm=eXi98cC0KP=5WayU05hezDFswrPe+vA58cTHvVLc80OzQ@mail.gmail.com> +In-Reply-To: <CAPWm=eXi98cC0KP=5WayU05hezDFswrPe+vA58cTHvVLc80OzQ@mail.gmail.com> +X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: E463 A93F 5F31 17EE DE6C 7316 BD02 9424 21F4 889F +X-PGP-Key-ID: BD02942421F4889F +X-PGP-Keyserver: hkp://pgp.mit.edu +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: Text/Plain; + charset="iso-8859-15" +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +Message-Id: <201602170046.17166.luke@dashjr.org> +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SBL, + RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.1 +X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on + smtp1.linux-foundation.org +Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [BIP Proposal] New "feefilter" p2p message +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 00:46:38 -0000 + +On Tuesday, February 16, 2016 8:20:26 PM Alex Morcos via bitcoin-dev wrote: +> # The feefilter message is defined as a message containing an int64_t where +> pchCommand == "feefilter" + +What happened to extensibility? And why waste 64 bits for what is almost +certainly a small number? + +> # The fee filter is additive with a bloom filter for transactions so if an +> SPV client were to load a bloom filter and send a feefilter message, +> transactions would only be relayed if they passed both filters. + +This seems to make feefilter entirely useless for wallets? + +Luke + |