diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | transcripts/scalingbitcoin/hong-kong/segregated-witness-and-its-impact-on-scalability.mdwn | 14 |
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/transcripts/scalingbitcoin/hong-kong/segregated-witness-and-its-impact-on-scalability.mdwn b/transcripts/scalingbitcoin/hong-kong/segregated-witness-and-its-impact-on-scalability.mdwn index ce2397b..dacf698 100644 --- a/transcripts/scalingbitcoin/hong-kong/segregated-witness-and-its-impact-on-scalability.mdwn +++ b/transcripts/scalingbitcoin/hong-kong/segregated-witness-and-its-impact-on-scalability.mdwn @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ Pieter Wuille (sipa) slides: <https://prezi.com/lyghixkrguao/segregated-witness-and-deploying-it-for-bitcoin/> +code: <https://github.com/sipa/bitcoin/commits/segwit> SPV = simplified payment verification @@ -90,4 +91,17 @@ A: It's never been in the UTXO set. But we are now able to treat the part of the 18:36 < aj> oh, huh, i guess segwit moving signatures out of the block means that the size of cross-chain witness proof things (what are they called?) for pegged sidechains is kind-of irrelevant... +(same-day) follow-up: <https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3vq8hm/multiple_new_bip_proposals_coming_up_on_day_2_of/> and <https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3vql34/segregated_witness_and_its_impact_on_scalability/> + +previously: + +<https://github.com/ElementsProject/elements/commit/663e9bd32965008a43a08d1d26ea09cbb14e83aa> + +<http://gnusha.org/bitcoin-wizards/2015-11-19.log> + +<https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3ngtx5/could_the_segregated_witness_part_of_the/cwnthlh> + +<https://people.xiph.org/~greg/blockstream.gmaxwell.elements.talk.060815.pdf> + + |