Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 23:39:51 +0000
To: Christopher DeLucia <deluciac@bu.edu>,
	Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
From: ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>
Reply-To: ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>
Message-ID: <AuLZSDpWg-6A75Z1awd0jVhhlGyUvjARCUoXMYbL7Nlfy1E-aC7GD2RLrGcaXk33gd6mHA_tdEonPcQCdXxgHnPU7-J2SMp7OGGd_1eE8-M=@protonmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPwAn9RLT7_FpQ4PMrN9OpoPw2y0qZDiGzMYp_fMq+A8sO55GQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPwAn9RLT7_FpQ4PMrN9OpoPw2y0qZDiGzMYp_fMq+A8sO55GQ@mail.gmail.com>
Feedback-ID: el4j0RWPRERue64lIQeq9Y2FP-mdB86tFqjmrJyEPR9VAtMovPEo9tvgA0CrTsSHJeeyPXqnoAu6DN-R04uJUg==:Ext:ProtonMail
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] IBLT & Bitcoin
Precedence: list

Good morning Chris,

As I understand it, the latest proposal for improved transaction relay is t=
o use Bose-Chaudhuri-Hocquenghem codes for set reconciliation.
https://github.com/sipa/minisketch

Regards,
ZmnSCPxj


Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.

=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 Original Me=
ssage =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90
On Sunday, May 12, 2019 9:35 AM, Christopher DeLucia via bitcoin-dev <bitco=
in-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> While in college (2017), I produced this paper on IBLT applications and B=
itcoin that referenced some of the research done by folks like Gavin Andres=
en and Rusty Russell.=C2=A0
>
> This should come with a disclaimer: I have not really looked at this pape=
r nor Bitcoin since 2017.=C2=A0 Additionally, this paper was not peer revie=
wed; it was just for class.
>
> Regardless, I came across it when I was cleaning out some old docs on my =
drive and figured I'd send it over to bitcoin-dev in the event it can contr=
ibute to anything at all.
>
> Thanks,
> Chris