Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WDdWT-0000zk-7Y for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 17:22:57 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.213.170 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.213.170; envelope-from=pieter.wuille@gmail.com; helo=mail-ig0-f170.google.com; Received: from mail-ig0-f170.google.com ([209.85.213.170]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1WDdWS-0002Ld-3U for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 17:22:57 +0000 Received: by mail-ig0-f170.google.com with SMTP id m12so2114065iga.1 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 09:22:50 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.43.65.145 with SMTP id xm17mr25982342icb.35.1392225770817; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 09:22:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.100.10 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 09:22:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52FBA7C3.4060603@gk2.sk> References: <52FBA7C3.4060603@gk2.sk> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 18:22:50 +0100 Message-ID: From: Pieter Wuille To: Pavol Rusnak Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (pieter.wuille[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1WDdWS-0002Ld-3U Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] [RFC] [BIP proposal] Dealing with malleability X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 17:22:57 -0000 On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Pavol Rusnak wrote: > On 02/10/2014 12:33 AM, Pieter Wuille wrote: >> The proposed document is here: https://gist.github.com/sipa/8907691 > > If we are bumping nVersion, how about dropping DER encoding completely > and using just 64 bytes directly for signature? That would be a hard fork. Certainly something to be discussed if we ever introduce a version-2 scripting language, but that's a long-term thing. -- Pieter