Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <decker.christian@gmail.com>) id 1QcgCt-0007zu-AN
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Fri, 01 Jul 2011 16:04:39 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.210.47 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.210.47;
	envelope-from=decker.christian@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-pz0-f47.google.com; 
Received: from mail-pz0-f47.google.com ([209.85.210.47])
	by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1QcgCs-0006j9-5N
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Fri, 01 Jul 2011 16:04:39 +0000
Received: by pzk36 with SMTP id 36so1077637pzk.34
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Fri, 01 Jul 2011 09:04:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.30.68 with SMTP id q4mr4034395pbh.435.1309536272044; Fri,
	01 Jul 2011 09:04:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.64.36 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 09:03:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinus7PWNLJi9rEvTtSB93hjLKhFpg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTinus7PWNLJi9rEvTtSB93hjLKhFpg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 18:03:52 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=+jZCANpe8Bmh_7e6KNnQZjF35yA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Development <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec520ebb950d36b04a7042c61
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(decker.christian[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
	0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Headers-End: 1QcgCs-0006j9-5N
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Useful bitcoin patches...
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 16:04:39 -0000

--bcaec520ebb950d36b04a7042c61
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Some appear to be beneficial to everybody.
Multithreading the RPC will certainly speed up quite a few services and I
see no downside in adding it. The same is true for Keep-Alive.

I'm against including the long polling support because incredibly few people
will benefit from it (pool providers) and yet it is included for everyone.

The Hub mode is good, and I would go a step further and optimize the
connection logic for all nodes by default.

Just IMHO

Regards,
Chris


On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 5:23 AM, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@exmulti.com> wrote:

> This was posted to IRC:
> http://davids.webmaster.com/~davids/bitcoin-3diff.txt
>
> Includes several useful features that all the big pools have been
> screaming for...  notably HTTP/1.1 keep-alive support.
>
> --
> Jeff Garzik
> exMULTI, Inc.
> jgarzik@exmulti.com
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
> Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
> threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
> sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>

--bcaec520ebb950d36b04a7042c61
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Some appear to be beneficial to everybody.<br>Multithreading the RPC will c=
ertainly speed up quite a few services and I see no downside in adding it. =
The same is true for Keep-Alive.<br><br>I&#39;m against including the long =
polling support because incredibly few people will benefit from it (pool pr=
oviders) and yet it is included for everyone.<br>

<br>The Hub mode is good, and I would go a step further and optimize the co=
nnection logic for all nodes by default. <br><br>Just IMHO<br><br>Regards,<=
br>Chris<br>
<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 5:23 AM, Jeff Gar=
zik <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:jgarzik@exmulti.com">jgarzik@ex=
multi.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=
=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">

This was posted to IRC:<br>
<a href=3D"http://davids.webmaster.com/%7Edavids/bitcoin-3diff.txt" target=
=3D"_blank">http://davids.webmaster.com/~davids/bitcoin-3diff.txt</a><br>
<br>
Includes several useful features that all the big pools have been<br>
screaming for... =A0notably HTTP/1.1 keep-alive support.<br>
<br>
--<br>
Jeff Garzik<br>
exMULTI, Inc.<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:jgarzik@exmulti.com">jgarzik@exmulti.com</a><br>
<br>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---<br>
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.<=
br>
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security<b=
r>
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes<br=
>
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.<br>
<a href=3D"http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2" target=3D"_blank">http://p.sf=
.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Bitcoin-development mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net">Bitcoin-develo=
pment@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development=
" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de=
velopment</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>

--bcaec520ebb950d36b04a7042c61--