Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C867D41C for ; Sun, 22 Oct 2017 17:11:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-it0-f51.google.com (mail-it0-f51.google.com [209.85.214.51]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D19934FD for ; Sun, 22 Oct 2017 17:11:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f51.google.com with SMTP id p138so3483859itp.2 for ; Sun, 22 Oct 2017 10:11:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=o4GrL4GPUOUnrFPXoNFhcZSwQ4DbfizWfDsh7CMgps0=; b=YMf3fuNBCoE3glMb2CES5/Oh9hfl2HMS/7pxDxJH7HoEP5nk6SowTpJs6HjLEw6s5n HTCPgq2FUbFme+LTIFtHHWD8DjFwCHONW+DOdl5BntNXwWeNxdKFl5+gYiDX5aAkiRsi gO/zFV0xqD7GqEsyi09+QZGkYHBhZ57P1cLnbQl1/DOVEoj/sbwF4BEnna6243kOdvn7 fw/680+0xW3EU8xQHFYRMDCWMdgvXm2CIFZTqHt29XSzk6KS90J8ScqROLU2Q1nf81FO NdOI4gHsTcZz9Wjp3ZDeVig1jSZLcPFbjVHVoJ4rARPOf94NJOAyEDVCD/Dlnkf2YuXh 4c6Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=o4GrL4GPUOUnrFPXoNFhcZSwQ4DbfizWfDsh7CMgps0=; b=cu2/OZHDPYyarfexTwjDl5v5xtW5kLPQWRGi1F+ztb98iBsyxjngpUUJ8izELJh4qo tfw8xoLvHapfesRhFk4n1aLSztWYp7YUgUeo/46d627uqGpMpHwKv46CmXsCAZSM+Gpo cb5PyIW3KuCG766DkmYhN5+BfcvbIx7ypC73vz3fIO8OUYeDy4x2XseUIZ9PH32OmQNl vjtloZKK1wz9GVHapum0vtsIqw1vnW9gMWIEsJuJS/nFf6Sn45r105mHq2k1gCkq329M Elw0TR4uoeGZVokn/lxqadm1he+/mfYOLY7ZdOw1mePq7DyXm+jacUuXd972QQ0B6YAX cvYw== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaXYw6IgvXJcMvvyZhykH6Qv9CDw0fqjJntQMRCiYCg40uBw2JH9 zcYVPRH/Nvxua+buxYCuJmeMdjircZnW5VSyQuw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+Sk37eb88rEoNmiiycxlY6BSQ1UnwxPML4GL6nBX9hbRDKd6yrrz9KacwkaEt+/EKOMZQc6OtFrTag3JdMuuk4= X-Received: by 10.36.25.4 with SMTP id b4mr5943346itb.108.1508692279564; Sun, 22 Oct 2017 10:11:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Kosta Zertsekel Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 17:11:09 +0000 Message-ID: To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1143d8266621d5055c25cb9c" X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 17:17:26 +0000 Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core build system (automake vs cmake) X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 17:11:23 -0000 --001a1143d8266621d5055c25cb9c Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi guys, I wonder why automake has become the build system for Bitcoin Core? I mean - why not cmake which is considered better? Can you please point to the relevant discussion or explanation? Thanks, --- Kosta Z. --001a1143d8266621d5055c25cb9c Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi guys,

I wonder why automake=C2=A0has= become the build system for Bitcoin Core?
I mean - why not cmake= which is considered better?
Can you please point to the relevant= discussion or explanation?

Thanks,
--- = Kosta Z.
--001a1143d8266621d5055c25cb9c--