Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <laanwj@gmail.com>) id 1Rz9zS-0006uy-As for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 16:51:58 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.210.47 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.210.47; envelope-from=laanwj@gmail.com; helo=mail-pz0-f47.google.com; Received: from mail-pz0-f47.google.com ([209.85.210.47]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1Rz9zR-0005ji-7T for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 16:51:58 +0000 Received: by mail-pz0-f47.google.com with SMTP id n34so5062815dal.34 for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 08:51:57 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of laanwj@gmail.com designates 10.68.135.134 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.68.135.134; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of laanwj@gmail.com designates 10.68.135.134 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=laanwj@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=laanwj@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.68.135.134]) by 10.68.135.134 with SMTP id ps6mr53550637pbb.66.1329670317017 (num_hops = 1); Sun, 19 Feb 2012 08:51:57 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.135.134 with SMTP id ps6mr44321336pbb.66.1329670316982; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 08:51:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.173.9 with HTTP; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 08:51:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <99923487-B2AA-4313-94F3-E88BA4631366@ceptacle.com> References: <15A9E3BE-3288-4CDC-8243-05669298CDB0@ceptacle.com> <CAGG4CB7HY4z0uvRXxc2S-Bmg9JdVFPDhJhLdWff2BE8eje3JTg@mail.gmail.com> <99923487-B2AA-4313-94F3-E88BA4631366@ceptacle.com> Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 17:51:56 +0100 Message-ID: <CA+s+GJB6i6rUSO1gztJNb-d6MU0nD35n0VLB9VeAm=ZaNzjrag@mail.gmail.com> From: Wladimir <laanwj@gmail.com> To: =?UTF-8?Q?Michael_Gr=C3=B8nager?= <gronager@ceptacle.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b10c7dbe982fd04b953fe2c X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (laanwj[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1Rz9zR-0005ji-7T Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] off-topic: bitcoin-forum... X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 16:51:58 -0000 --047d7b10c7dbe982fd04b953fe2c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Michael Gr=C3=B8nager <gronager@ceptacle.c= om>wrote: > Thanks! > > "required 5 posts and 4 hours" > > Well, that is not so easy if you cannot post ;) I will apply for > whitelisting - strange policy though... > It was instated in times that the forums were much more busy. There were a lot of new people that trolled the forum with questions immediately, which were answered throughout the forum already. This policy forces people to hang around the newbie forums a bit before being able to post to the "full" forum. I'm not sure it's really needed anymore -- anyway, it used to be much more strict and you'll have no problems getting whitelisted. Wladimir --047d7b10c7dbe982fd04b953fe2c Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Michael= Gr=C3=B8nager <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:gronager@ceptacle.co= m">gronager@ceptacle.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmai= l_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left= :1ex"> Thanks!<br> <br> "required 5 posts and 4 hours"<br> <br> Well, that is not so easy if you cannot post ;) I will apply for whitelisti= ng - strange policy though...<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>It was in= stated in times that the forums were much more busy. There were a lot of ne= w people that trolled the forum with questions immediately, which were answ= ered throughout the forum already. This policy forces people to hang around= the newbie forums a bit before being able to post to the "full" = forum. I'm not sure it's really needed anymore -- anyway, it used t= o be much more strict and you'll have no problems getting whitelisted.<= /div> <div><br></div><div>Wladimir</div><div><br></div></div> --047d7b10c7dbe982fd04b953fe2c--