Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.216.44 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.216.44; envelope-from=btcdrak@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-vn0-f44.google.com; 
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BLU436-SMTP318E346839A76DB15D7DC5C6DF0@phx.gbl>
References: <554A91BE.6060105@bluematt.me>
	<CANEZrP3wGWHdz+ut6pvke5TJJsc1rTFt8sn2KziX35oL5LAsyg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABm2gDpDvk2VsQ+mJ-BoeBKmvu9jBXNujZEFKuCStRNjFL6VOA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANEZrP2zAGCCBhNa4=9yw+A_Dn5o4SQXoPTE_qcJzZ1dFuF2tw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABm2gDqd6iHRUDKZWWTudcC1QkYa+rCuHjz7pMC2K1Db8wpgfA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANEZrP1CU0kB0vXeXUX1L8byaT-Zf2xg+3N+GeNthi_i6bn1qw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABsx9T2Nxvr4fqREMw3_LXftzsxrUAR1+9sVMa8_EpTnH1nN1Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<554BA032.4040405@bluematt.me>
	<CANEZrP3yM9wsSPNgpOsXDk-DjUy5PW2XuRTvK2AyCNbVJ5hZHw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADJgMzti7ROH90APiwg4NOAT5+Av=4i295b8VN0sbSLr4+WWRw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANEZrP39jWHLF02z-81Z4+9X1vH5+hMuS=-3ED81=Q1o9U=DKw@mail.gmail.com>
	<BLU436-SMTP318E346839A76DB15D7DC5C6DF0@phx.gbl>
From: Btc Drak <btcdrak@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 19:46:14 +0100
Message-ID: <CADJgMzvePYATxggBrvm4C=X-_a4fLKzyjqS_E-1Dk5anmE2cog@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gavin Costin <slashdevnull@hotmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec548a0c1bc7a1d0515825486
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Block Size Increase
Precedence: list

--bcaec548a0c1bc7a1d0515825486
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 7:40 PM, Gavin Costin <slashdevnull@hotmail.com>
wrote:

> Can anyone opposed to this proposal articulate in plain english the worst
> case scenario(s) if it goes ahead?
>
> Some people in the conversation appear to be uncomfortable, perturbed,
> defensive etc about the proposal =E2=80=A6. But I am not seeing specifics=
 on why it
> is not a feasible plan.
>

See this response:
http://www.mail-archive.com/bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net/msg07=
462.html

--bcaec548a0c1bc7a1d0515825486
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On T=
hu, May 7, 2015 at 7:40 PM, Gavin Costin <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"m=
ailto:slashdevnull@hotmail.com" target=3D"_blank">slashdevnull@hotmail.com<=
/a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:=
0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);=
border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style=3D"word-wrap:break-wor=
d;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-size:14px;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><div>Can =
anyone opposed to this proposal articulate in plain english the worst case =
scenario(s) if it goes ahead?</div><div><br></div><div>Some people in the c=
onversation appear to be uncomfortable, perturbed, defensive etc about the =
proposal =E2=80=A6. But I am not seeing specifics on why it is not a feasib=
le plan. =C2=A0</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>See this respon=
se: <a href=3D"http://www.mail-archive.com/bitcoin-development@lists.source=
forge.net/msg07462.html">http://www.mail-archive.com/bitcoin-development@li=
sts.sourceforge.net/msg07462.html</a>=C2=A0</div></div></div></div>

--bcaec548a0c1bc7a1d0515825486--