Delivery-date: Sun, 23 Mar 2025 18:29:34 -0700 Received: from mail-yb1-f185.google.com ([209.85.219.185]) by mail.fairlystable.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1twWdB-00032r-Ds for bitcoindev@gnusha.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 18:29:34 -0700 Received: by mail-yb1-f185.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-e5742f52896sf5646465276.3 for ; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 18:29:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20230601; t=1742779767; x=1743384567; darn=gnusha.org; h=list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-help:list-post :list-id:mailing-list:precedence:x-original-sender:mime-version :subject:references:in-reply-to:message-id:to:from:date:sender:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=NaMEsrA4ZiMdCVrqvAISZ+kx0RRyY7OpL7wGENrWhnM=; b=HA2Csq1Fm64QHuF2a8XWwD+ACW5szUF2vuyzQfll/HasHiEe5ek0KjI9OWyHPhaEeu SNUEahS3cFdT7NsWD9rW4wEv5JBYFO+oiR8bfRcHgbccE86hqzzOT3H7NzOCF6JyDZWI TWh3A+ORhrklABzJ5BwvNNePped7bZeTktDF+xx0RQtKWaEhVpQdM03kwldw1PQEGAuQ sU9Cc+ZUEmFadmSLCe6PbHCct9K9Gf6SoiPDEM3widrGG6X0Rb93pj4Rdt1HJspuRpGk eKn+MJbZh+QIH5TmnOyPlSsOfGalbcgJtu4HHj04UOnq+fcP/BKJLz2E6tSFU8bSBAa0 RiYg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1742779767; x=1743384567; darn=gnusha.org; h=list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-help:list-post :list-id:mailing-list:precedence:x-original-sender:mime-version :subject:references:in-reply-to:message-id:to:from:date:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=NaMEsrA4ZiMdCVrqvAISZ+kx0RRyY7OpL7wGENrWhnM=; b=PbLcpIkg/LJ1hdq4U9kCh3IH0PdnTs1mhB8CTxIt8kNZo34rTfkZ2JyebETRuNHmDz ImhZ+YZHaDQJnl/0onFhJaxgIT9rHeVq9o48kOB4ENKtgcy84aAH7OHcsNuPQXxxPKon c1ORB3J1O9p+zh/5YQet6zBwDLQy472jsI2d1GbDOGytc/R9gee/oEeCVh7lHqGyi6TW HkUb8odmoQpw5yxQF/9S4XyBkraHfcEtVa0cJX8VCMZ5UDk4On5d/4TuatzObu4p2gIq xsPG8MUKgO0qsMu0AbmR9ctz8SYXJwMB7Xne0akqJz1HHNaWl9/4FMm9Fld8njc/hM2t LSFg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1742779767; x=1743384567; h=list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-help:list-post :list-id:mailing-list:precedence:x-original-sender:mime-version :subject:references:in-reply-to:message-id:to:from:date:x-beenthere :x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=NaMEsrA4ZiMdCVrqvAISZ+kx0RRyY7OpL7wGENrWhnM=; b=l3SIiroXYdcJvvgh9A+NKHKqa31KMZ1iSXKx0FyRTacQmlgwRfzeasWcAXBF+cRqVx hdXgdNL7qxPfUoHOwL3qQJ8qOgPri1iIwLRlXr2Si6GGXrbtqvcBqt76PYc1qDw4idKN kdEN55v9GNYy5wyz1WNpIw1ytnD+rNoA/97E9u3zgxtXMYviMgICyBktdNgb4aFcVgqw 6NrZ9D9V33t605cM+Dwl42TcACh3Jbpkg8E0+giR93PjJR2HP5bZBvyj+sUm5ctmYUTJ mKPbLr2C1ZExKSZuxZQo8FE0s81Mys6vXemmrjyb++xW9nRrVOfknW4ov0GkqYx1B8bP GCFA== Sender: bitcoindev@googlegroups.com X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUSrREbBgXWL5PY05nE5FTJj1GamQQDvjFafCRKhht76jINfUI+V7fmlwfFA5zl1mFEhoDm9dIpD4ng@gnusha.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwLj6InryAQ4JTtcP+MRuWzG3qsvRn0QiZKvI9WFvy+9F/L+EvV ++px98qwyiLlkLn6QQBwendlK1LTj9z/oRK58z/TmhwlxkRjvJjz X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFK8IfbvQXIZBB9RUJ09VkhNCGn/yPpxVsNN0mI+4VWbZUCpqhedlTeFJ6CckI9/L4l4XFTNQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6902:841:b0:e63:cfbe:5d57 with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-e66a4f77e4emr15218024276.38.1742779767194; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 18:29:27 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bitcoindev@googlegroups.com; h=ARLLPAII6LyevZDIenjNgFXM0A0dJX5w34Y4ziYB09BrG0f6HQ== Received: by 2002:a5b:14c:0:b0:e64:fff:3d with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-e669136da59ls2130983276.1.-pod-prod-05-us; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 18:29:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:690c:a8b:b0:6f9:7ec7:3879 with SMTP id 00721157ae682-700bac5f840mr165912707b3.18.1742779763484; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 18:29:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 2002:a05:690c:6a86:b0:6ef:590d:3213 with SMTP id 00721157ae682-7009ba67b04ms7b3; Thu, 20 Mar 2025 06:10:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:690c:62c7:b0:6fe:b701:6403 with SMTP id 00721157ae682-7009bf84f2emr102078887b3.11.1742476227045; Thu, 20 Mar 2025 06:10:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 06:10:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Greg Sanders To: Bitcoin Development Mailing List Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <2584bf15-8e7f-4d89-8987-f41dd06b2824n@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: [bitcoindev] Time to add CSFS to Signet? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_60804_1717833161.1742476226542" X-Original-Sender: gsanders87@gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bitcoindev@googlegroups.com; contact bitcoindev+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 786775582512 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) ------=_Part_60804_1717833161.1742476226542 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_60805_162764372.1742476226542" ------=_Part_60805_162764372.1742476226542 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Noting that from my quick glance that the CSFS implemented in mutinynet is= =20 not BIP348 compliant. How much that matters for experimenters, I am not=20 sure. I opened a PR to inquisition to rectify the lack of BIP348-compatible PRs,= =20 at a minimum. Greg On Monday, March 17, 2025 at 12:02:52=E2=80=AFPM UTC-4 /dev /fd0 wrote: > Hi Weikeng, > > I agree that it has a lot of support among bitcoin developers. No=20 > objections for CSFS on [wiki][0]with evaluations from more than 50 bitcoi= n=20 > developers. > > Co-author of APO, Christian Decker has also expressed his support for it= =20 > on [twitter][1]. Even Greg Maxwell considers it [useful][2]. > > [0]: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Covenants_support > [1]: https://x.com/Snyke/status/1895880013796556818 > [2]: https://freenode.irclog.whitequark.org/bitcoin-wizards/2019-11-28 > > /dev/fd0 > floppy disk guy > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2025, 7:03 PM Weikeng Chen =20 > wrote: > >> I am writing just to solicit people's opinions on whether CSFS should be= =20 >> added to signet given that CTV + CSFS combination has recently received = a=20 >> lot of support. Although CTV has already been on signet for a few years,= =20 >> CSFS isn't. >> >> With CTV and CSFS being on the signet also allows part of the LNHANCE to= =20 >> start experimenting, and it has been discussed that CSFS helps with BitV= M=20 >> by replacing Winternitz signatures completely with a much lower potentia= l=20 >> on-chain data availability overhead. This also allows applications relyi= ng=20 >> on CTV + CSFS to develop further. >> >> Thanks, >> Weikeng >> >> --=20 >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups= =20 >> "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send a= n=20 >> email to bitcoindev+...@googlegroups.com. >> To view this discussion visit=20 >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/2584bf15-8e7f-4d89-8987-f41= dd06b2824n%40googlegroups.com=20 >> >> . >> > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bitcoindev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/= cfaa1df8-44bb-4d1a-9e3b-3f390421a23cn%40googlegroups.com. ------=_Part_60805_162764372.1742476226542 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Noting that from my quick glance that the CSFS implemented in mutinynet is = not BIP348 compliant. How much that matters for experimenters, I am not sur= e.

I opened a PR to inquisition to rectify the lack of= BIP348-compatible PRs, at a minimum.

Greg=
On = Monday, March 17, 2025 at 12:02:52=E2=80=AFPM UTC-4 /dev /fd0 wrote:
H= i Weikeng,

I agree that it has= a lot of support among bitcoin developers. No objections for CSFS on [wiki= ][0]with evaluations from more than 50 bitcoin developers.

Co-author of APO, Christian Decker has a= lso expressed his support for it on [twitter][1]. Even Greg Maxwell conside= rs it [useful][2].


/dev= /fd0
floppy disk guy

On Mon, Mar 17, 2025, 7:03 PM Weikeng Chen <weiken...@l2iterative.com> wrote:
I am writing j= ust to solicit people's opinions on whether CSFS should be added to sig= net given that CTV + CSFS combination has recently received a lot of suppor= t. Although CTV has already been on signet for a few years, CSFS isn't.=

With CTV and CSFS being on the signet also allows part = of the LNHANCE to start experimenting, and it has been discussed that CSFS = helps with BitVM by replacing Winternitz signatures completely with a much = lower potential on-chain data availability overhead. This also allows appli= cations relying on CTV + CSFS to develop further.

= Thanks,
Weikeng

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bitcoindev+..= .@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/2584bf15-8e7f-4d89-8987-= f41dd06b2824n%40googlegroups.com.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bitcoind= ev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoind= ev/cfaa1df8-44bb-4d1a-9e3b-3f390421a23cn%40googlegroups.com.
------=_Part_60805_162764372.1742476226542-- ------=_Part_60804_1717833161.1742476226542--