Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <eth3rs@gmail.com>) id 1Yzcwr-0005se-AQ
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Tue, 02 Jun 2015 03:33:05 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.216.174 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.216.174; envelope-from=eth3rs@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-qc0-f174.google.com; 
Received: from mail-qc0-f174.google.com ([209.85.216.174])
	by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1Yzcwq-0007qu-AC
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Tue, 02 Jun 2015 03:33:05 +0000
Received: by qcxw10 with SMTP id w10so55363438qcx.3
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Mon, 01 Jun 2015 20:32:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.229.58.73 with SMTP id f9mr5298531qch.30.1433215978900; Mon,
	01 Jun 2015 20:32:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.140.18.240 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 20:32:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CANJO25KUvYNzGLDjr=d_gUSKe0xAju+34W9B6jmcSjQvGXR=2g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <556CDB09.8050906@henricson.se>
	<CANJO25KUvYNzGLDjr=d_gUSKe0xAju+34W9B6jmcSjQvGXR=2g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 23:32:58 -0400
Message-ID: <CAEM=y+Xf9b1p-KB-PKzjtMirM8_WMbpMZuQyGyDv+6GM=0O9hA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ethan Heilman <eth3rs@gmail.com>
To: gabe appleton <gappleto97@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1133196c4f13e70517809968
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(eth3rs[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1Yzcwq-0007qu-AC
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Meta suggestions for this block size
	debate
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 03:33:05 -0000

--001a1133196c4f13e70517809968
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I second this, I don't have time to read the large number of emails
generated every day from the block size debate. A summary of the various
positions and arguments would be extremely helpful.

On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:02 PM, gabe appleton <gappleto97@gmail.com> wrote:

> Also, can we try to get a wiki page for the debate? That way we could
> condense the information as much as possible. I'll be willing to assist if
> the page gets approval.
> On Jun 1, 2015 6:41 PM, "Mats Henricson" <mats@henricson.se> wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> My fingers have been itching many times now, this debate
>> drives me nuts.
>>
>> I just wish all posters could follow two simple principles:
>>
>> 1. Read up. Yes. All of what has been written. Yes, it will
>>    take many hours. But if you're rehashing what other
>>    smarter people have said over and over before, you're
>>    wasting hundreds of peoples time. Please don't.
>>
>> 2. Be helpful. Suggest alternatives. Just cristizising is
>>    just destructive. If you want no change, then say so.
>>
>> Mats
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bitcoin-development mailing list
>> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
>

--001a1133196c4f13e70517809968
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">I second this, I don&#39;t have time to read the large num=
ber of emails generated every day from the block size debate. A summary of =
the various positions and arguments would be extremely helpful.=C2=A0</div>=
<div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Jun 1, 20=
15 at 11:02 PM, gabe appleton <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:gappl=
eto97@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">gappleto97@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrot=
e:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-l=
eft:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><p dir=3D"ltr">Also, can we try to get=
 a wiki page for the debate? That way we could condense the information as =
much as possible. I&#39;ll be willing to assist if the page gets approval. =
</p><div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5">
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Jun 1, 2015 6:41 PM, &quot;Mats Henricson&quo=
t; &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:mats@henricson.se" target=3D"_blank">mats@henricso=
n.se</a>&gt; wrote:<br type=3D"attribution"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quot=
e" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">=
Hi!<br>
<br>
My fingers have been itching many times now, this debate<br>
drives me nuts.<br>
<br>
I just wish all posters could follow two simple principles:<br>
<br>
1. Read up. Yes. All of what has been written. Yes, it will<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0take many hours. But if you&#39;re rehashing what other<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0smarter people have said over and over before, you&#39;re<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0wasting hundreds of peoples time. Please don&#39;t.<br>
<br>
2. Be helpful. Suggest alternatives. Just cristizising is<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0just destructive. If you want no change, then say so.<br>
<br>
Mats<br>
<br>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Bitcoin-development mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net" target=3D"_bla=
nk">Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development=
" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de=
velopment</a><br>
</blockquote></div>
</div></div><br>-----------------------------------------------------------=
-------------------<br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Bitcoin-development mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net">Bitcoin-develo=
pment@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development=
" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de=
velopment</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>

--001a1133196c4f13e70517809968--